As a species, we seem to have traded a high rate of often deadly infectious disease for an ever-growing epidemic of chronic neurological and autoimmune conditions alongside a continual increase in all forms of cancer.  This trend appears to have begun some 150-200 years ago.  While this trend has since increased with time, periodically events occur which create a dramatic spike in the trajectory. 

For example, to cite a passage from the Real Anthony Fauci: [B2]

“Under Dr. Fauci’s leadership, the allergic, autoimmune, and chronic illnesses which Congress specifically charged NIAID to investigate and prevent, have mushroomed to afflict 54 percent of children, up from 12.8 percent when he took over NIAID in 1984…. Graves’ disease, and Crohn’s disease, which were practically unknown prior to 1984, suddenly became epidemic under his watch.

Similarly autism, which many scientists consider an autoimmune disease, exploded from between 2/10,000 and 4/10,000 Americans when Tony Fauci joined NIAID, to one in thirty-four today (2021) [one in 31 in 2025]. Neurological diseases like ADD/ADHD, speech and sleep disorders, narcolepsy, facial tics, and Tourette’s syndrome have [also] become commonplace in American children.” (p.36)

Through his control of the media and the NIH grant system, he [Fauci] transformed the culture of science to one where it was politically incorrect to question dominant narratives. For example, when one of the world’s top cancer virologists (who had never had a grant request denied) made a compelling case AIDS was not caused by HIV [which essentially destroyed AIDS ‘grift’], all future grants he applied for were denied [which continues to this day].  This in turn, sent a chilling message to other scientists as their lifeblood are the grants they receive. Likewise, Fauci was able to have his critics branded as “AIDS denialists” which hence justified refusing to even debate or even consider their ideas [which horrified many other prominent scientists [B2] at the time, including the inventor of the PCR tests Dr Kary Mullis]

Also refer Power of the Purse: NIH Distributes Billions for Research and Studies [B2]

Every year, the National Institutes of Health distributes billions of dollars in grants and contracts for research and studies. In 2022 NIH research grants totaled $33.3 billion. RFK,. Jr reports that “Between 2010 and 2016, every single drug that won approval from the FDA – 210 different pharmaceuticals – originated, at least in part, from research funded by the NIH.” The United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is the named owner of at least 4,400 patents. Under an HHS policy, NIAID employees can earn up to $150k annually from drugs they help develop at taxpayer’s expense.

At the same time Big Pharma is granted taxpayer money for product development, scientists and researchers who need funding for research are largely dependent on being in the good graces of those who hold the purse strings at NIH. In a 2006 Harper’s article, Celia Farber exposed the corruption and vendetta-driven system, headed by Dr. Anthony Fauci for 40 years, that has made NIAID an appendage of Big Pharma.

… Fauci’s transformation of the national research apparatus into one where you are not allowed to challenge existing scientific dogmas is the primary reason why innovative and disruptive ideas that move science forward (and were responsible for building the esteemed reputation science holds with the public today) have largely disappeared. [B2]¹

A Medical Misinformation Mess [B2}

John Ioannidis, […] Professor of Medicine at Stanford, his own analysis a few years ago, of 60,000 published medical studies for therapeutic interventions, revealed only about 7% of them were actually found to be high quality and relevant to patients. He wrote another paper in which he found that most published findings are false. So what’s going on here? … We have an epidemic of misinformed doctors and misinformed patients, rooted in:

• biased funding of research. That’s research that’s funded because it’s likely to be profitable, not beneficial for patients;
• biased reporting in medical journals, where they exaggerate the benefits of the drug and minimise the harms.
• From what’s come from the drug industry;
  • biased reporting in the media;
  • commercial conflicts of interest;
  • and last but not least, an inability of doctors to understand and communicate health statistics.

Healthcare is the top cause of all our (US) overdue debts and personal bankruptcy. Our medical spending per person is double that of other countries, but fully half the treatments are ineffective or harmful. Immense, predatory industries such as angioplasty and coronary artery bypass surgery victimize us. These procedures cause complications and deaths. 60 to 70 percent of us are on prescriptions, and 20 percent take over five. One in six uses psychiatric medicine, which commonly causes irreversible brain damage and premature death. Millions are now addicted to prescription opioids. At least fifty-thousand people die each year from overdoses. [double that today]

The FDA allows big Pharma to tailor or falsify the studies required to patent drugs. These corporations hire armies of ghost-writers to stuff websites and [well funded] medical journal articles with marketing lies.² Finding the truth is now nearly impossible. But all this gets over-looked even as the companies pay billions of dollars in criminal settlements nearly every year.³

The Global Kidnapping of American Medicine Turns Hospitals into Killing Fields [B2]

In the U.S., in March 2020, we were told that we needed to lock down for two weeks to protect our hospitals from being swamped with sick and dying covid-19 patients. We were also told assertively that the new pandemic could cause up to 2.2 million deaths in the U.S. alone. [B3] That model was flawed at the outset. Author Neil Ferguson of the Imperial College London was known for his earlier “sensational death estimates from mad cow disease, bird flu, and swine flu.” [C3]⁴ Three strikes, and he should have been out. Since then, citizens have been betrayed again and again by the public health system, representatives of medicine and public health, including Anthony Fauci, Deborah Birx, directors of the CDC, NIH, and executives with the Department of Health and Human Services. We have learned of multiple betrayals and manipulations of data [B2] by international medical journals, universities, medical centers, and public health officials.  In one example:

Nicole Sirotek is a registered nurse trained to oversee a ventilator and worked in May 2020 on the frontlines in New York City at the height of the first wave of covid
hospitalizations. She was horrified by the deaths she witnessed in two hospitals that she states were from “medical mismanagement” and “gross negligence.” She issued a twenty-four-minute video detailing the mismanaged deaths she was witnessing and was subsequently let go from her duties. She has since founded American Frontline Nurses. She testified [B2] in January of 2022 before Senator Ron Johnson’s panel in the US Senate.

There are too many Dead! ^{5 6} [An Inquiry into Australia’s Excess Mortality] [B1]

A recent study by Wilson Sy looking at ‘Simpson’s Paradox‘⁷ in the correlations between excess mortality and COVID-19 injections found ‘Earlier epidemiological evidence that COVID injections reduce illness and death is now methodologically invalidated, and the claim that the injections are beneficial for the vulnerable is refuted. The injections explain the mystery of significant numbers of non-COVID excess deaths. The Australian pandemic is shown to be iatrogenic in nature, particularly for the elderly, who have suffered disproportionate harm. Deliberately ignoring this clear evidence is tantamount to iatrogenic geronticide.’

The Longevity Crisis [C3]

For decades American experts have noted exponential increases in cancer, heart disease, diabetes, hypertension, asthma, and rheumatoid diseases, but the implications are ignored. Now, insurance companies are suddenly reporting increased death benefits that reflect declining average life span in the American population for three years running. The CDC attributes these changes to suicides, drug abuse, and COVID, but these tragic factors alone cannot account for the decreasing longevity of the entire population, nor can conventional medicine explain the cause. The implications are not rocket science, and they are not new.

Apart from drugs, there are also medical scanning procedures used for a variety of purposes where the financial incentives are breathtaking: routine ultrasounds add over $1 billion annually to prenatal care costs, PSA screening generates $3 billion yearly, while the colonoscopy industry rakes in $4billion. Each test justified by the mantra of “early detection” when the real detection is of new revenue streams. The NordICC trial [B2] revealed colonoscopy’s modest 18% reduction in cancer incidence with no significant reduction in deaths, requiring 455 people to be screened to prevent just one cancer over a decade. Similarly, multiple studies demonstrate routine mammograms and PSA tests fail to reduce mortality while creating cascades of false positives, unnecessary biopsies, and life-altering treatments for conditions that would never have caused harm.⁸

Next comes the systematic minimization of risks—patients rarely hear that mammography’s radiation exposure is equivalent to several hundred chest X-rays, that colonoscopy prep acts as a “forest fire” through the gut microbiome, or that ultrasound waves can heat fetal tissue and affect neuronal migration in developing brains. A landmark 2025 study [B3] published in JAMA Internal Medicine projects that the 93 million CT scans performed in the United States during 2023 likely will result in approximately 103,000 future cancer cases over the lifetime of exposed patients. This staggering projection suggests that CT scans could account for roughly 5% of all new cancer diagnoses annually in the United States. CT scan usage has exploded from 3 million annual scans in 1980 to over 90 million today in the United States, making medical imaging the primary source of radiation exposure for most Americans beyond [other] background radiation. [such as 5G]

Also refer Ionizing radiation and cancer: The failure of the risk model – Chris Busby [C2]

The new paper illuminates the hidden way in which the US-influenced radiation model was constructed between 1956 and 1977: the Absorbed Dose, Linear No Threshold method. This diluted internal radioactivity into the whole body in such a way that it could be argued that its health effects were vanishingly small. In reality, radiation effects at the DNA and the cell (where cancer starts) were thousands of times higher, as was the cancer yield from exposures.

Public Opinion on Prescription Drugs and Their Prices [C3]

KFF research has consistently found prescription drug costs to be an important health policy area of public interest and concern. Our polls find that most people take at least one prescription drug and most see their benefits to society, yet majorities see these drugs as too expensive and three in ten struggle to afford their medicines. About six in ten adults say they are currently taking at least one prescription drug, and [over] a quarter say they currently take four or more prescription medications.

Do Your Drugs Work? A Searchable Database [B1]

Federal regulators have authorized hundreds of drugs without evidence they work, and many are dangerous. As part of our investigation “FDA Approved — And Ineffective,” [B2] we compiled a searchable database of all 429 drugs approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration between January 2013 and Dec. 31, 2022, and the scientific evidence submitted by drugmakers to demonstrate the drugs were safe and effective. You can use the following database [linked here and in title] to evaluate drugmakers’ claims. Each drug is given a color based on how well it met basic criteria used to determine whether they work and are safe. Experts assessed the validity of drugmakers’ evidence based on four essential criteria cited in case law and the FDA’s own standards for determining whether drugs work and are safe:

• Control group: Patients taking the drug were compared to a control group given a placebo or a preexisting treatment.
• Clinical endpoint: The studies measured the drug’s effect on how a patient feels, functions, or survives, rather than a surrogate measure for these effects, like a CT scan or blood test.
• Replication: At least two “well-controlled” trials showed the drug was effective.
• Blinding: Subjects in the studies and their doctors didn’t know which patients were on the drug and which were in the control group.

Also refer FDA approval process is broken: Hundreds of drugs do not work, some have dangerous adverse effects [B2]

The History of Medicine

The book that I feel best describes the (medical) trajectory of our nation is the Robber Barons [B3]. To summarize: The post-civil war era was perfectly suited for a rapid industrialization of the continent.  A few conniving scoundrels emerged that had no hesitation in doing whatever was needed to win.  They voraciously consumed everything around them in their pursuit of profit, becoming fabulously wealthy and developing the United States into an industrial power. A common Robber Baron approach was to, by any means necessary, monopolize their chosen industry and, frequently with physical or economic violence crush their competitors.  John D. Rockefeller was amongst the most adept at this approach and before long monopolized the American Oil Industry.  Over time, the public got fed up with Robber Baron’s behavior and riding this popular sentiment, “to save capitalism” President Theodore Roosevelt (1901-1909) broke up their monopolies.

Trust in Physicians and Hospitals During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a 50-State Survey of US Adults [B3]

Findings In every sociodemographic group in this survey study among 443,455 unique respondents aged 18 years or older residing in the US, trust in physicians and hospitals decreased substantially over the course of the pandemic, from 71.5% in April 2020 to 40.1% in January 2024. Individuals with lower levels of trust were less likely to have been vaccinated or received boosters for COVID-19.

[I concur with the above, and believe that the control of our health is in the hands of ‘Big Pharma’. I highly recommend The Forgotten Side of Medicine [B1] by “A Midwestern Doctor” (260k+ subscribers and highly endorsed) to all those interested in learning more about this field, including the history and effects of medicines]

A Health Chronology [B2]

What began as an alleged concern for human well-being has, over no less than six decades, been gradually re-engineered into a sprawling infrastructure of technocratic governance. This chronology outlines how ‘health’ — once the domain of doctors and patients — was transformed into a planetary-scale system of behavioral management, risk modeling, and programmable compliance. Past the false start in 2009, the system was operational by 2020. The COVID-19 response demonstrated the viability of a planetary-scale command-and-control apparatus: algorithmically justified restrictions, biometric access systems, global legal harmonisation, and seamless integration between private firms, health authorities, and international bodies. Today, with the WHO Pandemic Treaty now codified into law—soon to be followed by global Digital ID frameworks, and the Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing agreement [see below] — health has become the central vector for planetary governance. It now fuses biology, behavior, ecology, economics, and morality into a single control layer — where anticipation, not treatment, is the operative logic. This is not public health as care. It is public health as compliance.

Over nearly six decades, the transformation of public health followed a clear and uninterrupted arc: from planning (1966–1980s), to technocratic coordination (1980s–2000s), to legal codification (2005–2015), and finally to simulation and activation (2016–2025). Along the way, health was systematically fused with climate policy, biodiversity management, and global development goals — becoming the convergence point for managing behavior, mobility, resources, and risk. What began as the ‘moral imperative’ to treat illness developed into a planetary-scale system of programmable compliance. Health became a control interface: governed by metrics, managed by algorithms, and enforced through digital infrastructure. This chronology does more than reveal a pattern — it documents the deliberate construction of a cybernetic regime where crisis is continuous, participation is conditional, and control is total. The human being, redefined as a risk vector and carbon emitter, now exist within a continuous crisis loop, perpetually managed, always monitored — never free.

What has been implemented is not merely treaties, but a global operating system — a moral, technical, and legal framework designed to govern populations in real time. And its greatest innovation was not the fusion of health and climate, but the erasure of any domain where governance could be contested.

Pharmakeia: America’s Seniors Are Being Overmedicated Into Oblivion [C3]

Among adults aged ≥65 years, men (89.0%) and women (89.3%) were equally likely to take prescription medication. Prescription medication use increased with age, from 48.4% for those aged 18–44 years to 89.2% for those aged ≥65 years, and this pattern of increasing use with age was observed for both men and women. Adverse drug events (ADEs) have now surged to become the third leading cause of death in the US.

Also refer The WHO/UNICEF DTP vaccination programme throughout the developing world is a crime against humanity

“WHO, under pressure from the Gates Foundation, uses DTP vaccination coverage rates to measure whether a country is meeting its vaccination goals (and is thus eligible for additional funding). Given that the DTP shot kills 5 times more kids than it saves, the WHO/UNICEF vaccine programme throughout the developing world is a crime against humanity that must be prosecuted by the International Criminal Court,” Dr. Toby Rogers wrote in 2022.

The Bandim Health Project (“BHP”) in Guinea-Bissau (West Africa) has the best data set in the world on vaccine benefits and harms. Founded in 1978 by legendary Danish doctor and anthropologist Peter Aaby, the Bandim Health Project is a collaboration between the Ministry of Public Health in Guinea-Bissau, the Statens Serum Institut in Denmark, and researchers affiliated with the University of Southern Denmark and Aarhus University. Over the last three decades, Dr. Aaby and his team have studied the non-specific effects of the other vaccines administered in Guinea-Bissau. His findings in connection with the DTP vaccine – the most widely administered vaccine in the world – are the most shocking.

Across multiple studies, Dr. Aaby found that children vaccinated with DTP have 5 times higher (95% CI: 1.53–16.3) all-cause mortality than children who were not injected with DTP. He and his team also found sex effects – girls were more likely to die following DTP vaccination than boys. (For those who care about science, there are also race effects from vaccines but that discussion is prohibited in the corporate media in the US because the entire vaccine programme would crumble if people knew. The order in which vaccines are administered makes a difference too – another important factor ignored by public health officials in the US.)

The Plot to Get RFK Jr [B3]

An apparent leaked minutes document suggests that a trade association held a meeting in April to undo the confirmation of Kennedy by the duly elected US Senate. It alleges that the Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO), whose membership includes Pfizer, Merck, Novavax, Vaxcyte, and hundreds of biotech firms that profit from regulatory insulation, convened a closed-door strategy meeting and openly discusses the need to “go to The Hill and lobby that it is time for RFK Jr. to go.” Nowhere in the document is there any serious discussion of scientific debate. Nowhere is there a plan to confront Kennedy’s actual policy proposals—such as the Kennedy Bar, which calls for preclinical safety testing, raw data publication, long-term health tracking, and restoration of manufacturer liability. Instead, BIO’s plan is to erase Kennedy’s credibility through managed optics and surrogate deployment. This would be an attack on the nation’s top doctor (in charge of national health).

Also described in Pharma’s Coup Attempt: How Cartel Insiders Are Plotting to Oust Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. [C3]

The New Eugenics Movement – Part 2 [C3]

You essentially have a multi-trillion dollar monopoly in the hands of five people. They aren’t even independent between the East and West Coast entities because Doudna herself moved from one to the other to set up the UCSF entity known as the ‘Innovative Genomics Institute‘. One of the things that we have learned over the last 4 years of bio-fascism masquerading as “pandemic preparedness” is that everywhere you see an attempt to impose medical treatments on others, you will find the World Economic Forum (WEF). And CRISPR is no different. Here is Haoyi Wang for the WEF telling us how they are going to harness gene editing for multiple and permanent genetic changes.¹³

Vaccine Effectiveness before Covid [refer Page on “Biolabs and Pandemics“ for the Covid posts]

Vaccinated versus Unvaccinated – a CDC Study from 1999 [B2]

Which brings us to an incredibly important series of charts that used the CDC’s own data to once again irrefutably prove what a deadly iatrogenic (depopulation) program the entire vaccine schedule really is. The last chart is indicative: Death from Common Infectious Diseases Declined 90% BEFORE vaccines were introduced.

[thanks to Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense, they were able to obtain the records through a FOIA request several years ago]

Also refer A stunning testimony from political economist Dr. Toby Rogers [B2]

His conclusion, after a systematic review of 1,000+ studies: “The autism and chronic disease epidemics are primarily caused by toxicants, mostly from vaccines, and about a dozen additional toxicants.”

And (1.) Aaron Siri drops bombshell in Senate hearing of study conducted between vaccinated and unvaccinated children and (2.) Henry Ford Vaxxed vs. Unvaxxed Study [both B2 – same study cited]

1. Researchers found was that vaccinated children had 4.29 times the rate of asthma, 3.03 times the rate of atopic disease, 5.96 times the rate of autoimmune disease, and 5.53 times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders, which included 3.28 times the rate of developmental delay and 4.47 times the rate of speech disorder.
2. Henry Ford birth cohort (n=18,468) tracked children from birth for 10 years. After 10 years: 57% of vaccinated vs 17% of unvaccinated had chronic illness. Unvaccinated children had ZERO cases of brain dysfunction, ADHD, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, or tics.

Also refer Impact of Childhood Vaccination on Short and Long-Term Chronic Health Outcomes in Children: A Birth Cohort Study [B2]

Conclusion: This study found that exposure to vaccination was independently associated with an overall 2.5-fold increase in the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition, when compared to children unexposed to vaccination. This association was primarily driven by asthma, atopic disease, eczema, autoimmune disease and neurodevelopmental disorders. This suggests that in certain children, exposure to vaccination may increase the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition, particularly for one of these conditions.

What are the Pros and Cons of Each Type of Vaccine? [B2]

The vaccine industry has been largely shielded from scrutiny because of the belief that “vaccines are safe and effective.” As a result, there is very little discussion of how vaccines are made, or the merits of each approach. Here, I will review some of the foundational principles of vaccine design and the clinical implications of those designs that I believe are critical to understanding their efficacy.

Likewise, the principles of vaccine design are also critical for parents trying to decide which immunizations are appropriate or inappropriate for their children to receive (as the relative risks of each type vary immensely). Of note, as more and more new investigations of the vaccine program emerged around the globe, Stanley Plotkin, who many consider to be the father of vaccinology, made a startling admission:¹⁴

“Post-authorization studies are needed to fully characterize the safety profile of a new vaccine, since prelicensure clinical trials have limited sample sizes, follow up durations, and population heterogeneity”. [Safety unknown]

This excerpt from Dr. Gates’ paper on the research submitted for publication in 1918 and as primary Rockefeller Institute investigator on the vaccinations given at Ft. Riley, Kansas prior to the outbreak of disease, gives you a flavor of the state of vaccination art and his involvement at that time:

“The vaccine used was made in the laboratory of The Rockefeller Institute. 16-hour growths on 1 per cent glucose agar in Blake bottles were washed off with isotonic salt solution, like strains pooled, and the concentrated suspensions immediately heated to 65°C. for 30 minutes to kill the cocci and inactivate the autolytic ferment…Accordingly, the vaccinations were begun with the injection of 500 million cocci, and this initial dose was increased in successive groups by 250 or 500 million until it had reached 2,000 million. For the second and third doses in each group, the first dose was usually multiplied by two and by four…About half of those vaccinated, whose third injection was due after February 4, 1918, were given a final injection of 4,000 million, on account of the occurrence of several fairly severe reactions from the larger dose among medical officers at Fort Riley. In some regiments the vaccinations had been completed before February 5.”¹⁵

A critical analysis of the Australian government’s rationale for its vaccination policy [B1]

Vaccination policies in Australia need to be scrutinised because the use of a medical intervention in the prevention of infectious disease has serious health and social implications. Deaths and illnesses to infectious diseases were significantly reduced due to environmental and lifestyle reforms prior to the widespread use of most vaccines in the mid-20th century. Mass vaccination campaigns were adopted after this time as the central management strategy for preventing infectious diseases, with many new vaccines being recommended in the National Immunisation Program (NIP).

The implementation of mass vaccination programs occurred simultaneously with the development of partnerships between academic institutions and industry.

The Australian government’s NIP, like all member countries of the World Health Organisation (WHO), is recommended by the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation (GAVI). This is a partnership with the WHO and UNICEF that includes the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Associations (IFPMA), the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF), the Rockefeller Foundation, the United Nations Development Fund (UNDF) and other private research institutions.

All members of this public-private partnership influence the development of WHO global health policies. [and all are, or are controlled by, cult members]

Vaccine Free Quick Start Guide for Parents [B2]

• Vaccines never saved us: DEATH from all infectious diseases dropped over 98% before most vaccines were introduced. Measles deaths dropped 99.96% before the vaccine was introduced. Death from Scarlet Fever also dropped in the same way, and there’s no vaccine for it.
• Unvaccinated children are healthier than vaccinated children according to numerous studies and the parents who have both (scroll down for more info).
• Vaccines destroy immune CAPACITY, which is why unvaccinated children recover from illnesses faster than vaccinated children.
• HEALTHY children do not die from infections – malnourished children do. Vaccines are not the solution – proper nutrition is. Vitamins A & C easily treat measles, for example.

The Hidden Tragedy of Neurological Vaccine Injuries [B2}

Story at a Glance:

• Neurological injuries from vaccination have been documented since the smallpox vaccine over two centuries ago, with severe injuries reported throughout medical literature.
• The medical profession concealed these injuries, believing public vaccination benefits justified hiding information that might create vaccine hesitancy. [sound familiar?]
• Historical injuries – like spreading paralysis – mirror current “one in a million” vaccine injuries, but toxicity documentation was erased to preserve the “safe and effective” narrative.
• In the past, these injuries were widely reported, but now research into them is widely censored.
• Many of these forgotten reports are critical for understanding modern “inexplicable” conditions like Autism. [or ‘SIDS’ and ‘SADS’: “Unknown” is now a leading ’cause’ of death as from 2019]¹⁶

Autism, Made in the USA [B2]

Over the past few decades, the dramatic increase in autism spectrum disorders (ASD), now diagnosed in 1 in every 36 children [now 1 in 31 as of 2025], has often been attributed to improved definitions for ASD and diagnostic tools. However, a closer look at government statistics reveals alarming trends in children’s health that go far beyond better diagnostics. Since the early 1990s, there have been staggering increases in several chronic conditions: ADHD rates have risen by 890 percent, autism diagnoses by 2,094 percent, bipolar disease in youth by 10,833 percent, and celiac disease by 1,011 percent. These numbers beg the question—what has fundamentally changed in our children’s health over the past three decades?

(A) reliance on ideology over empirical scrutiny extends to vaccine development, where standard double-blind placebo trials, the gold standard for FDA drug approval, are glaringly absent [there are virtually none. At all]. Vaccines such as the hepatitis B shot for infants and the HPV vaccine Gardasil for adolescents have been approved with minimal scientific rigor, yet they are heavily promoted and, in many cases, mandated.

Also refer The Mercenaries of Science [B2]

Last week, the New York Times published a bizarre “Guest Essay” on autism by Jessica Steier, a Pharma mercenary who has at least ten financial conflicts of interest and no background in autism research. I submitted a reply to the article to correct her disinformation, and the NY Times refused to publish it. Jessica Steier runs a science-for-hire company, “Unbiased Science.” She uses a number of pass-through organizations to launder contributions from large pharmaceutical and chemical companies. However, one can still figure out a lot of her funders (see article on “Unbiased Science Podcast” in SourceWatch). Steier advises an infant formula company and is an affiliate for a company that makes monosodium glutamate (MSG). Her podcast has taken money from 3M, Procter & Gamble, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, Novartis, Moderna, and CSL Seqirus (a flu vaccine manufacturer).

Also refer Exclusive: Autism and Vaccine Scientist Arrested for Allegedly Stealing $1 Million from CDC [B2]

The arrest is especially significant to the MAHA (Make America Healthy Again) movement because Poul Thorsen, who is also a physician, is one of the authors of a 2003 study considered the “gold standard” in determining there is no link between autism and vaccines containing a preservative called thimerosal. Safe vaccine advocates have alleged that the study was deceptive and fatally flawed. Secretary Kennedy said the study is widely cited by health officials who argue there is no link to autism from vaccines containing the preservative. That finding was adopted in 2004 by the influential National Academy of Medicine, he said. It also resulted in the dismissal of some 5,000 injury cases in the federal court designated to handle vaccine injury petitions, Kennedy said.

A book by investigative reporter James Ottar Grundvig titled Master Manipulator: The Explosive True Story of Fraud, Embezzlement, and Government Betrayal at the CDC takes a deep dive into Thorsen’s role in the study. Former CBS investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson wrote in the forward:

“The fact that the CDC would contract with the likes of Dr. Thorsen on crucial research of vaccines and autism, and never consider setting aside his findings after his twenty-two-count criminal indictment, speaks to the waning credibility of the world’s premiere health agency.”

Injecting chemicals is MORE DANGEROUS than eating them, so why is polysorbate 80 banned in ICE CREAM but allowed in VACCINES? [C2]

A growing scientific and ethical controversy has erupted over the use of Polysorbate-80 (PS-80), a synthetic emulsifier linked to intestinal aging and metabolic dysfunction when ingested — yet routinely injected into newborns through 22 different vaccines. While food regulators debate restricting PS-80 in processed foods, health authorities continue to defend its presence in vaccines, raising urgent questions about chemical safety standards and transparency in medicine. A study published in Food Research International found that PS-80 accelerates cellular aging in the intestines by triggering “lipotoxicity,” flooding cells with toxic fats and inflammation. Food safety experts, including those cited by KFF Health News, warn that emulsifiers like PS-80 damage gut linings and alter microbiome balance.

Plotkin Under Oath: Nine Hours That Exposed the Vaccine Industry [B1]

In January 2018, attorney Aaron Siri conducted a nine-hour deposition of Dr. Stanley Plotkin that stands as one of the most revealing insider testimonies about vaccine development ever recorded under oath. Plotkin, widely regarded as the “godfather of vaccines” was the developer of the rubella vaccine.

Under oath, the world’s most prominent vaccine expert admitted that comprehensive safety studies comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated children have never been conducted, that adverse event reporting captures less than one percent of actual injuries, that safety monitoring typically lasts only days after injection, and that financial conflicts of interest permeate every level of vaccine development and regulation.

The One-Minute Elevator Explanation [of Plotkin’s deposition]

Vaccines are developed by a handful of pharmaceutical companies that make billions annually while being protected from lawsuits by a 1986 law. The same people who develop vaccines also advise government agencies on which vaccines to recommend, creating massive conflicts of interest. Safety testing is shockingly brief – often just days after injection – and true placebo studies are rarely done. Instead of comparing vaccines to harmless saline, they’re compared to aluminum adjuvants or other vaccines, hiding the real rate of side effects. Of note, Aluminium in Vaccines Is Harmful. [B2] [aluminium is a highly neurotoxic metal]

Methods of deceit underlying pathology, virology and genetics [B3}

Jamie Andrews of the Virology Control Studies Project, interviewed by Sasha Latypova, condensed transcript:

Dr. Stefan Lanka, who did some control experiments during 2022 showing that the cell culture isolation of viruses was essentially fraudulent. I took that as a benchmark to try and replicate his results and then further them because he actually, the story goes that he did the genetic sequencing, that he managed to take a control culture and genetically sequence it and build the SARS-CoV-2 genome out of essentially a cell line which shouldn’t have SARS-CoV-2 in it.

EU Explores Withdrawing Glyphosate Approval over New Shocking Cancer Study [C2]

A European Commission spokesperson has confirmed that the EU executive stated that European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) will be formally tasked with assessing whether the peer-reviewed findings of a new international study [B2] showing that glyphosate causes six of the most common cancers affect the current risk assessment of glyphosate. “If ECHA or EFSA would confirm that glyphosate no longer meets the approval criteria or that the conditions of approval must be amended, the Commission will act immediately to amend or withdraw the approval,” the EC spokesperson stated Friday.

MIT Scientist Sounds Alarm: Glyphosate Tied to Autism, Cancer, Infertility, and Even Wildfires [B2]

Glyphosate, produced by Monsanto (now Bayer), is not only used on genetically modified “Roundup Ready” crops but increasingly as a desiccant, sprayed on non-GMO grains, legumes, and even sugar cane to speed harvests. Independent testing, including by Moms Across America, has detected glyphosate in:

• 100% of fast-food samples tested
• 95% of public school lunches
• One-third of breast milk samples
• Human urine samples across North America

She explains that both glyphosate and synthetic mRNA can trigger protein misfolding, leading to prion diseases such as Creutzfeldt–Jakob Disease, ALS, Alzheimer’s, and Parkinson’s. “These aren’t coincidences,” she stressed. “The rise in glyphosate tracks perfectly with the rise in autism and countless other disorders. Glyphosate isn’t the only factor, but it’s the driving force behind today’s epidemics.”

The Big Zika Lies: Revisiting the Timeline, the Narratives, and the Ignored Science [C2]

In 2015, global media and health authorities declared war on a new public health threat: the Zika virus. Women in Brazil, particularly in the impoverished Northeast, were warned that a bite from a mosquito could lead to devastating birth defects, especially microcephaly. The World Health Organization (WHO) declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued sweeping advisories. The panic was viral. But the so-called scientific consensus was fragile—built on rhetorical devices, not empirical rigor. What if Zika wasn’t the cause of Brazil’s microcephaly crisis?

To understand what really happened, we must revisit the timeline, because the facts—as they played out—contradict the official story at nearly every step. Microcephaly cases began rising in Northeast Brazil well before the first Zika infections were detected. Brazil’s live birth defect registries show microcephaly rates began to climb in 2012 and intensified in 2013–2014. Meanwhile, the Zika virus wasn’t detected in Brazil until July 2014, and even then, it was retrospective surveillance that uncovered it. The first public reports attributing microcephaly to Zika came in October 2015.

At the same time, and in the same region—Northeast Brazil—Brazil’s Ministry of Health had implemented an aggressive public health campaign targeting pregnant women in the slums. This included the deployment of a tetanus-diphtheria-pertussis vaccine. Crucially, the formulation used in these settings was the whole-cell pertussis vaccine (wP), not the acellular version (aP) used in wealthier countries. Whole-cell pertussis vaccines are known to be highly reactogenic and are no longer recommended for use in adults or pregnant women in countries like the United States due to their elevated risk profile.

Dr. Wadely de Oliveira from Instituto Butantan confirmed that whole-cell pertussis vaccines were indeed administered to pregnant women in the slums of Northeast Brazil during 2014 and 2015—the very same period immediately preceding and during the microcephaly surge. This campaign was subsequently halted in 2016. Afterward, microcephaly cases plummeted. Zika virus, however, continued to circulate. No new surge in microcephaly followed. Further, a landmark study by Paganelli et al. (2010) offers critical mechanistic insight into how glyphosate-based herbicides (GBHs) can produce microcephaly and other neural defects—findings that mirror the patterns observed during the microcephaly surge in Northeast Brazil.

Also refer Military Shuts Down Bill Gates Genetically Modified Mosquito Project in West Africa [B3]

Ali Tapsoba of the Coalition for Monitoring Biotechnological Activities explained that the impacts of gene-drive organisms are “highly controversial, unpredictable, and… potentially irreversible.”

“The problem is the solution proposed by Target Malaria, which consists of eliminating the vector using gene-drive mosquitoes,” said Tapsoba. “This technology is highly controversial, unpredictable, and raises ethical concerns. More specifically, the impacts of gene-drive organisms on health and ecosystems remain unknown and potentially irreversible.”

For Captain Ibrahim Traoré’s military government, the issue wasn’t only ecological—it was political. This was about sovereignty. The military accused Gates’ consortium of bypassing real consent and imposing dangerous experiments on African soil under the banner of “malaria prevention.” Burkina Faso’s military government has exposed what Western agencies refuse to admit: Bill Gates is bankrolling high-risk genetic experiments that bypass informed consent and put human populations at risk. Further, Dengue Fever surges by 400% in Brazil after Bill Gates-Backed GMO Mosquitos released [in 2023] [C3]

Doctors Today

Broken Doctors for a Broken Medical System [B2]

Looking at America’s Healthcare system and its effectiveness in helping people with chronic disease, there is little reason to feel positive about it nor to be hopeful that serious reforms will be implemented any time soon. The medical industrial complex realizes that a healthier nation not as dependent upon medical doctors nor pharmaceutical drugs will significantly reduce its monetary profits.¹⁷ The health of patients plays little importance when huge profits are at stake, and one must always remember that modern medicine is a business first and foremost. Health care in America is enormously costly because it’s designed to be that way.

Also refer Doctors Are More Harmful Than Germs: How Surgery Can Be Hazardous to Your Health [C3] by Dr Bigelsen

Inflammation, according to Dr. Bigelsen, is the real cause of all chronic disease (persistent or long-lasting illness).¹⁸ Noting that Western medicine has yet to “cure” a single chronic disease, Bigelsen points to a new paradigm: one that treats each patient as an individual (rather than as a set of symptoms),¹⁹ avoids further damage to the body through surgery, and looks for the root cause of chronic disease in past damage done to the patient’s body—whether caused by a bad fall or a scalpel. Provocatively written and radical in its approach, “Doctors Are More Harmful Than Germs” challenges readers to rethink everything they believe about illness and how to treat it.

Also refer: Inflammation: The Common Pathway of Stress-Related Diseases [B2]

“75–90% of human disease is related to the activation of stress system“

Court documents reveal clinical trial rigging, regulatory failure and global deception regarding Merck’s HPV vaccine [C2]

Merck has rigged Gardasil trials to conceal harms, according to a newly unsealed report by Danish physician Peter C. Gøtzsche submitted to an American court.
Writing about Gøtzsche’s expert review, Maryanne Damasi says:

“[His] forensic analysis … lays bare a chilling narrative of clinical trial rigging, regulatory failure and global deception.”

In his report, Gøtzsche stated that Merck distorted clinical trial data, making the results scientifically meaningless, and manipulated the recording and reporting of adverse events to minimise the appearance of harm. He suggested that Merck’s actions constitute a profound violation of medical ethics, with millions of adolescents and their families potentially misled into consenting to a vaccine with obscured safety risks.

How Big Pharma Hijacked Evidence-Based Medicine [B1]

Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) is a relatively recent phenomenon. The term itself was not coined until 1991. It began with the best of intentions — to give frontline doctors the tools from clinical epidemiology to make science-based decisions that would improve patient outcomes. But over the last three decades, EBM has been hijacked by the pharmaceutical industry to serve the interests of shareholders rather than patients.

Today, EBM gives preference to epistemologies that favor corporate interests while instructing doctors to ignore other valid forms of knowledge and their own professional experience. This shift disempowers doctors and reduces patients to objects while concentrating power in the hands of pharmaceutical companies. EBM also leaves doctors ill-equipped to respond to the autism epidemic and unable to produce the sorts of paradigm-shifts that would be necessary to address this crisis.

How Can We Stop The WHO’s Horrific Pandemic Treaty? [B1]

Briefly, to summarize this racket:

• Has convinced the world that we face an existential risk of a dangerous new infectious disease jumping from wild animals to the human population and then wiping out humanity.
• Has pivoted to trying to convince the world that the root cause of the increasing frequency of these diseases is not their leaky biolabs [or ‘vaccines’], but rather climate change and human encroachment on nature.
• Uses the fear of a pandemic that “might” wipe out humanity to justify invasive surveillance of every aspect of our lives and drum up a lot of money to “fix” the problem. That money is then spent on scouring the world for potentially dangerous diseases (after which animals infected with them will be brought back to labs) developing “countermeasures” for these pathogens, and
• performing genetic engineering (GoF) on existing viral diseases to make them more deadly in order to be able to better understand how future pandemic viruses might behave.

Also refer: Who Funds the WHO? Bill Gates, Pharma, Big Tech—But 62% Comes from Shadowy Anonymous Sources [B2]

A new BMJ Global Health study has confirmed that the World Health Organization’s (WHO) private fundraising arm—the WHO Foundation—has received tens of millions of dollars from pharmaceutical giants, Big Tech companies, and anonymous sources, with over half the funding now untraceable.

Also refer The WHO Pandemic Accords Consolidate the Power of the Covid Clerisy on a Global Scale [B2]

The WHO Pandemic Accords, as the two documents are known, are a good example of the type of global governance initiatives on which there is a consensus among technocratic elites, but against which there is a rising populist revolt. Covid saw a successful bureaucratic coup that displaced elected governments with unelected experts and technocrats as de facto policymakers. The pandemic accords provide the WHO with legal authority to declare an actual or apprehended emergency and the power thereafter to commandeer resources for itself from sovereign states and redirect resources funded by the taxpayers of one country to other states, on the basis of what the WHO chief alone considers simply a risk of potential harm. Furthermore, clauses on misinformation and disinformation will lead to censorship, once again despite the harmful and enduring legacy of this during Covid. The reality of dissent, diverse opinions and robust scientific debate was kept hidden from the people who [as a result] no longer trust governments and experts, like they largely did before Covid, to level with them. 

New report: The true covid pandemic was one of policy, not pathology [B1]

In early 2020, the world recoiled as reports of a novel coronavirus, purportedly unleashed from a laboratory or wet market, ignited a global crisis. Official narratives, amplified by the World Health Organisation’s 11 March 2020 pandemic declaration, framed covid-19 as a relentless, contagious pathogen sweeping through populations, overwhelming hospitals, and claiming lives indiscriminately. Yet, as Denis Rancourt and his team meticulously demonstrate in their groundbreaking study, this narrative crumbles under rigorous scientific scrutiny. Their analysis, summarised here in 27 questions and answers, reveals a startling pattern: excess mortality did not align with the expected dynamics of viral spread but instead correlated tightly with aggressive medical interventions.
.
Synchronised death spikes across Europe and North America, defying geographic logic, erupted immediately post-declaration, with no significant excess deaths prior. Cities like Rome, with heavy air traffic from Asia, saw minimal mortality, while New York’s Bronx, served by expanded hospital systems, suffered catastrophic losses.

Rancourt’s work, lauded in ‘Beyond Contagion’ for challenging virological dogma, underscores a grim irony: “88% of patients put on ventilators in New York died,” not from a virus but from protocols like mechanical ventilation and high-dose drug regimens. Despite such evidence, many, as noted in ‘Rancourt Testimony’, cling to the notion of a “weaponised virus,” a belief Rancourt dismantles as scientifically untenable. This study highlights iatrogenic harm: hospital protocols, not a swarming pathogen, drove the mortality crisis.

Also refer Medical nemesis : the expropriation of health [C2]

it’s what Ivan Illich called iatrogenic dependency in his seminal work, ‘Medical Nemesis‘. Illich coined this term for medicine – institutions that promise to heal while creating new forms of illness – but the pattern applies perfectly to AI as well.

PART I. Clinical latrogenesis — 1. The Epidemics of Modern Medicine — Doctors’ Effectiveness – an Illusion — Useless Medical Treatment — Doctor-Inflicted Injuries — Defenseless Patients — PART II. Social latrogenesis — 2. The Medicalization of Life — Political Transmission of Iatrogenic Disease — Social latrogenesis — Medical Monopoly — Value-Free Cure? — The Medicalization of the Budget — The Pharmaceutical Invasion — Diagnostic Imperialism — Preventive Stigma — Terminal Ceremonies — Black Magic — Patient Majorities

and TGA FAILURE TO INVESTIGATE COVID VAX DEATHS [B3]

Of the 1042 (VAERS reported) deaths, 266 had no critical time to death after injection data. It could be that a further 266 people died on the same day of injection. This possibility was apparently not followed up by the TGA. Why not? If temporal information is not available, the TGA has a convenient and plausible excuse for not linking the death to the vaccine. Furthermore, only 11 of the 35 cases of death reported on the same day of injection had a preliminary causality assessment. But none of the 35 were subject to further investigation by the Vaccine Assessment Group to assess if the vaccine actually caused the death. This is incompetence at best and willful blindness or criminal behaviour at its worse.

Also refer The covid response was not a mistake [B2]

This is really important to understand. So, people who died of/with covid lost, on average, a year of life. But the vast majority of the population did not die. So, only 6 days were lost on average across the entire UK population.

This raises a problem that governments and public health officials knew well before imposing lockdowns: the known impact of poverty and inequality on life expectancy. To quantify, well-accepted UK data from Marmott et al. (2020) show a 5-year gap between life expectancy of the upper decile (rich) and lower decile (poorest) people in the country. Covid caused, in comparison, a 6-day reduction in life expectancy (averaged across the whole population). It is therefore almost inconceivable that an intervention that greatly increases poverty could be less harmful than covid, from a public health viewpoint.

and The trillion-dollar biotech industry is facing failure –and it’s because of covid injections [C2]

The biotechnology industry, valued at $1.74 trillion, is facing failure and criticism due to the high rate of adverse effects and excess deaths associated with mRNAcovid-19 injections. In an effort to save themselves, the industry is trying to bypass safety testing and regulation, and is profiting from lightly regulated areas such as animal veterinary care and biotechnology food processing, while launching a fightback through opinion pieces in corporate media. For example:

On 19 August, The Wall Street Journal opinion column headlined ‘RFK Jr.’s Misguided War on mRNA’ misdescribed more careful safety regulation as an effort “to tarnish a promising technology, a move that could damage US innovation.”

On 15 August, a Washington Post opinion piece headlined ‘I witnessed Operation Warp Speed. Trump’s refusal to defend it is baffling’. It cited a now discredited three-year-old study which claimed the covid-19 vaccines saved three million lives in the US and described the development of covid-19 vaccines as “a masterstroke of American competition.”

The New York Times opinion columns on 18 August led with ‘America Is Abandoning One of the Greatest Medical Breakthroughs’. It laments the Department of Health and Human Services’ decision to wind down 22 mRNA vaccine development projects under the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, or BARDA, halting nearly $500 million in government biotechnology investments. Whilst admitting the vaccines had problems and side effects, the article rolled out a version of that tired old saw, “give us another chance and some more money, we will get it right next time.”

[Three cult media outlets spreading the same disproven lies]

Also refer The Truth Explodes in Berlin: mRNA “Vaccines” Tied to Population Implosion [B2]

Germany’s top scientists, doctors, and academics have sounded the alarm, issuing a joint red alert that the experimental Covid mRNA injections are fueling a global health catastrophe and driving a population implosion. At a press conference in Berlin [on 16 September 2025], nine leading experts called for an immediate halt to mRNA vaccinations, citing overwhelming evidence of excess mortality, rising disease rates, and collapsing birth rates tied directly to the rollout of the shots. The panel of experts was supported by more than 200 doctors, scientists, lawyers, and health professionals.

“Today, we are issuing an urgent risk warning and calling for a moratorium on mRNA vaccines, an immediate halt, and an evidence-based reassessment,” the group declared.

Further, this article was written in the hope that collective amnesia could be broken as we are now at the precipice of the pharmaceutical industry’s grip over the media being broken. For that reason … I compiled 54 news reports on the dangers of numerous vaccines which have been almost entirely forgotten [and are no longer conducted].

Predictive Medicine: How AI Now Controls Your Healthcare [B2]

Healthcare is becoming more about predicting illness rather than treating it. From genome-based insurance pricing to AI-generated risk scores, supporters say predictive medicine promises a health revolution — but critics are warning us that it’s nothing more than a preemptive profit engine. The NHS, United Health Group, and Kaiser Permanente are just a few of the major healthcare providers using AI to determine patient eligibility, prioritise care, and flag high-risk patients.

• A recent report from the Brookings Institution highlighted concerns that predictive tools are being implemented without sufficient oversight by regulators, making the systems less transparent and more immune to public accountability [Source: Brookings]
• A 2022 BMJ study warned that AI tools for predicting health patterns may rely on flawed or incomplete data sets, perpetuating racial and/or socioeconomic bias [Source: BMJ]
• In 2023, the NHS started using machine learning in pilot programs to fast-track identification of cancer patients deemed at risk, deprioritising those with lower projected benefit [Source: Gov.uk]
• AMA reports that AI tools tell insurance companies to deny treatment for up to 16 times more patients than if they were subject to human review, and warns AI must be used under strict supervision [Source: AMA]

Also refer THE FACE OF EVIL: Canadian Doctors Push to Euthanize Disabled Babies [F3]

In 2021, the Canadian Parliament repealed the requirement that the natural death of those applying for assisted suicide [MAiD] be “reasonably foreseeable”. This took place only five years after the original legislation allowing euthanasia and assisted suicide was passed in 2016. In 2024, legislation was introduced so that euthanasia and assisted suicide would be legal on the grounds of mental health alone in March 2027, whilst a Parliamentary committee in Canada recommended in 2023 that euthanasia be made available for children under certain conditions, and that it be made more easily available for prisoners.

Speaking before Second Reading of Kim Leadbeater’s assisted suicide Bill, Trudo Lemmens, professor of law at the University of Toronto, who initially supported  Canada’s assisted suicide and euthanasia law, said “One of the most worrying aspects of the Canadian experiment is it shows that once you start legalising, there is a risk that a significant number of physicians normalise this practice”. “It’s like putting fuel on the fire. I’m not sure it can be easily contained”.

In Canada in 2023, the most recent year for which data is available, 15,343 people died through euthanasia and assisted suicide. This equates to 4.7% of all deaths.

[Given Alberta is about 1/8th the population of Canada, this puts Euthanasia [just under 2000 deaths] close to 3rd in all causes of death (behind ‘unknown’) as per the footnote below]¹⁶

Also refer The Doctor Will Kill You Now [B2]

… patients scheduled to be terminated via MAiD in Canada are actively recruited to have their organs harvested. In fact, MAiD accounts for 6 percent of all deceased organ donors in Canada. [Seems to be a growth industry, given what is happening in Gaza]²²

Node without Consent [B2]

What we’re witnessing isn’t just technological innovation – it’s what I’ve come to see as biometric colonization, where bodily data is extracted and controlled in ways that echo the resource extraction of colonial empires. This isn’t just about privacy or data security – though those concerns are serious enough. This is about the fundamental sovereignty of your own biology. When your neurons can be monitored in real time, when your brain activity can be networked to the cloud, when your DNA is stored in corporate databases that can be sold or hacked, who truly owns the essence of your existence? Your DNA isn’t just information – it’s you: your genetic identity, your health predispositions, characteristics tied to your family lineage. You can’t change it like a password or cancel it like a credit card. It’s permanent, revealing secrets about you that you might not even know yourself.

How about The Medicine Of The Future instead? [B2]

Preventing and treating multicausal diseases requires a systems-based approach that gives equal weight to environmental factors (such as toxins), deficiencies in essential nutrients, and lifestyle choices. Today’s “normal” is often mistaken for “natural,” and mere correlations are frequently misinterpreted as causation—often with devastating consequences for public health. For example, age is commonly cited as the primary risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease, even though this correlation merely reflects the time it takes for the consequences of an unhealthy lifestyle to manifest clinically. There are many ways to destroy mental health, so there is no single drug that will ever change the course of the disease. Prevention requires that these pathways be recognized, understood, and offered to the public (e.g., NehlsM: Unified theory of Alzheimer’s disease (UTAD): implications for prevention and curative therapy).

Linked Medicine is nothing like a surgeon

Go Home

1. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/how-anthony-fauci-weaponized-science ↩︎
2. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40536143/ ↩︎
3. From “Butchered By Healthcare” Paperback – October 8, 2020 by Robert Yoho MD (Author) ↩︎
4. https://archive.org/download/2016-x-two/2005.pdf ↩︎
5. https://socialmedianpa.gumroad.com/l/toomanydead ↩︎
6. https://nexusnewsfeed.com/article/human-rights/spain-authorizes-military-planes-to-spray-disinfectants-over-cities/ ↩︎
7. Sy, Wilson. (2023) Simpson’s Paradox in the correlations between excess mortality and COVID-19 injections: a case study of iatrogenic pandemic for elderly Australians. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371342838_Simpson’s_Paradox_in_the_correlations_between_excess_mortality_and_COVID-19_injections_a_case_study_of_iatrogenic_pandemic_for_elderly_Australians ↩︎
8. https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/ct-scans-the-cancer-machine ↩︎
9. https://lonewolves.info/wp-admin/post.php?post=1883&action=edit ↩︎
10. https://harvoa.org/polio/misc/OstromParalyticpolio.htm ↩︎
11. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8255173/ ↩︎
12. https://youtu.be/R_VNHYF9O38?si=yIu9Ru7MpBZYe-SD [F6] ↩︎
13. https://lonewolves.info/wp-admin/post.php?post=327&action=edit#abf7ed21-3de0-4e11-a981-c832a017abba ↩︎
14. https://lonewolves.info/?p=2012 ↩︎
15. https://lonewolves.info/wp-admin/post.php?post=1883&action=edit
    WWI was the first conflict in which our military were given multiple (and experimental) vaccines. According to his memorial biography, Dr. Frederick L. Gates – who was assigned to the Rockefeller Institute staff run by his father – “gave lectures to military groups (at the Rockefeller Institute) … was also assigned to visit training camps, in the interest of preventive medicine, and traveled widely”. What they don’t mention is his role as primary investigator on the vaccinations given at Ft. Riley, Kansas prior to the outbreak of disease. On May 25, 1917 an Army Medical School had been established at Ft. Riley, Kansas.  Shortly thereafter, in October 1917, 525 cases of Typhoid Fever occurred in Kansas, and the State Board of Health gave 9,000 “free shots”. Three months later, an outbreak of “meningitis” occurred. The US Navy and Army estimated that 40 percent and 36 percent of their servicemen had been affected. (It is important to note that an “outbreak” of meningitis usually involves one or two people. To have over 30% of personnel affected is totally outside the norm for reported outbreaks of meningitis.) The response again was to administer more crude home-made meningitis vaccines, beginning in January 1918 and continuing into February 1918. ↩︎
16. Canadian doctors and a civil liberties lawyer in the Canadian province of Alberta are raising concerns about a growing trend of deaths labeled as “unknown causes” after an unprecedented increase in such deaths was recorded in 2021. This new category on autopsy reports and death records now tops ‘Covid-19,’ which was added to Alberta’s death tally in 2020. A study looking at excess deaths in Alberta was quietly released in March in the International Journal of Infectious Diseases. That study found the “Top 10 Causes of Death in 2021” by the Government of Alberta were as follows:
    ill-defined and unknown causes (3,362)
    Dementia (2,135)
    Covid-19 (1,950)
    Chronic ischemic heart disease (1,939)
    Malignant neoplasms of trachea, bronchus, and lung (1,552)
    Acute myocardial infarction (1,075)
    Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ( 1,028)
    Diabetes mellitus (728)
    Stroke (612)
    Accidental poisoning by and exposure to drugs and other substances (604)
    The unknown causes of death category began appearing on the list in 2019. There is no record of it appearing before that year which is most odd. ↩︎
17. https://rumble.com/v6vpq2z-exposed-how-healthcare-profits-by-keeping-you-sick-secretary-kennedy.html?e9s=src_v1_s%2Csrc_v1_s_m ↩︎
18. https://www.everydayhealth.com/wellness/united-states-of-stress/link-between-stress-inflammation/ ↩︎
19. https://au.checkmybodyhealth.com/blogs/lifestyle/stress-vs-inflammation-what-your-nutritionist-wants-you-to-know ↩︎
20. The Problem-Reaction-Solution theory, often intertwined with the Hegelian Dialectic, is a framework frequently used to scrutinize major global events and policies. This analytical lens suggests that powerful groups or entities engineer a problem, anticipating a public reaction that allows them to offer a pre-planned solution. While ostensibly solving the issue, these solutions often serve hidden interests, whether they be financial gains, increased power, or expanded control. ↩︎
21. Canadian doctors and a civil liberties lawyer in the Canadian province of Alberta are raising concerns about a growing trend of deaths labeled as “unknown causes” after an unprecedented increase in such deaths was recorded in 2021. This new category on autopsy reports and death records now tops ‘Covid-19,’ which was added to Alberta’s death tally in 2020. A study looking at excess deaths in Alberta was quietly released in March in the International Journal of Infectious Diseases. That study found the “Top 10 Causes of Death in 2021” by the Government of Alberta were as follows:
    ill-defined and unknown causes (3,362)
    Dementia (2,135)
    Covid-19 (1,950)
    Chronic ischemic heart disease (1,939)
    Malignant neoplasms of trachea, bronchus, and lung (1,552)
    Acute myocardial infarction (1,075)
    Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ( 1,028)
    Diabetes mellitus (728)
    Stroke (612)
    Accidental poisoning by and exposure to drugs and other substances (604)
    The unknown causes of death category began appearing on the list in 2019. There is no record of it appearing before that year which is most odd. ↩︎
22. https://greatreporter.com/2025/07/17/exposed-israels-history-of-organ-harvesting-and-the-global-demand-driving-it/ ↩︎