Climate Change vs Environmental Harm & Food – Understanding Today: The war on humanity

One of the most depressing things I have watched in my lifetime has been major polluters hijacking the environmental movement and transforming it from something that fought against the destruction of our air and water to a fanatical crusade against (harmless) carbon dioxide. Sadder still, this crusade has gradually become a war and has adopted the same playbook used by the parties which lust for complete power over the citizenry.¹

Similarly with global warming, because so much was invested into having it be the entire face of environmentalism. Once its predictions failed to materialize, something else had to be done to preserve the investment. This was, of course, “climate change,” an even more vague and undefinable target that anything and everything could fit into, including every destructive effect of pollution that had nothing to do with carbon dioxide being emitted.

Many noteworthy examples of data have been presented that challenged the global warming hypothesis (either that warming was happening or that carbon dioxide, which only composes 0.04% of our atmosphere, correlates to temperature changes). Almost all of these have been censored. The best example I ever came across happened during what was known as “Climategate,” where hackers got access to many documents and private emails from leading climate researchers worldwide in 2009. Although the press buried this story, the leaked files showed the following:

A lot of data manipulation occurred to support the climate narrative; especially once raw data showed a downward trend in global temperatures after 2001. For example, a decision was made to primarily use temperature monitoring stations in hotter areas (while throwing out many more stations in colder areas) and then using the remaining (hotter) stations to extrapolate (hotter) temperatures for every single station (e.g., those in the colder areas). Similarly, numerous “adjustments” were made to the raw data, which increased the final temperatures.
Most of the raw temperature data (which the theory of global warming was founded upon) was thrown out, thereby making it impossible for anyone to question or verify the scientist’s work. In emails, the scientists also discussed working to illegally circumvent Freedom of Information Act laws so their misconduct could not be uncovered.
Leading climate scientists actively conspired to subvert the scientific peer review process to ensure that papers skeptical of their climate change narrative had no access to publication.
This scientific malfeasance occurred globally (e.g., in England and in the USA at NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). Their erroneous results provided the involved scientists with continued funding and were repeatedly cited by officials (e.g., the Obama administration) worldwide to justify public climate policy.

For individuals wishing to learn more about these events, they are detailed here.

What kick-started the ‘Climate Change’ agenda?

By far the most influential organizer of Rockefeller’s ‘zero growth’ agenda [B2] in the early 1970s was David Rockefeller’s longtime friend, (ironically) a billionaire oilman named Maurice Strong. Canadian Maurice Strong was one of the key early propagators of the … theory that man-made CO2 emissions from transportation vehicles, coal plants and agriculture caused a dramatic and accelerating global temperature rise which threatens “the planet” – so-called “Global Warming”. As chairman of the 1972 Earth Day UN Stockholm Conference, Strong promoted an agenda of population reduction and lowering of living standards around the world to save the environment: “Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?” He also that year became a trustee of the Rockefeller Foundation – who financed his launch of the Stockholm Earth Day project (Elaine Dewar, op cit. p.277).

In 1976, they published “RIO: Reshaping the International Order” which called for a new international order, including an economic redistribution of wealth. During the Carter Administration, a task force was appointed to expand upon this report, and on July 24, 1980, a two-volume document called “Global 2000 Report,” which had been written by former Secretary of State Cyrus R. Vance, was presented to President Carter and then Secretary of State Edward S. Muskie. It attempted to project global economic trends for the next twenty years, and indicated that the resources of the planet were not sufficient enough to support the expected dramatic increase in the world population. The report called for the population of the U.S. to be reduced by 100 million people by the year 2050.

Howard T. Odum, a marine biologist at the University of Florida [also a member of the Club of Rome] was quoted in the August, 1980 edition of Fusion magazine:

“It is necessary that the United States cut its population by two-thirds within the next 50 years.” He didn’t say how this would be accomplished.

By 1989 Strong was named by the UN Secretary General to head the 1992 UN Conference on Environment and Development or UNCED (“Rio Earth Summit II”). He oversaw the drafting of the UN “Sustainable Environment” goals there, the ‘Agenda 21 for Sustainable Development‘ (that forms the basis of Klaus Schwab’s Great Reset), as well as the creation of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) of the UN. [For an indepth ‘biography’ of Maurice Strong and his activities, see here]

A Climate Chronology [B2]

A detailed chronology of the determined use of ‘Climate Catastrophe’ for profit and to achieve global compliance and population control in less developed nations. Here are the last three items [references within linked chronology]:

2016 Carbon Dioxide Fertilization Greening Earth, Study Finds.
Alarmingly, NASA prove themselves to be on the page of crazy conspiracy theorists by posting an article, stating the obvious. The IPCC and UNFCCC naturally do as would be reasonably expected – ignore said stated obviousness.
2018 World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice.
Undeterred by their complete failure to predict the future in 1992, not only did these crooks repeat the same message, but they in fact now claim the situation has deteriorated. And the Union of Concerned Scientists, again, were involved in this shameless refusal to own up. More than 15,000 alleged ‘scientists’ signed this absurdity, including architects, social scientists, veterinarians, museum curators, teaching assistants, zoologists, PhD students, even physicians and quite possibly parking attendants and student bus drivers too, making this 15,000 number all the more legit.
2020 Greening of the Earth Mitigates Surface Warming.
NASA confirms the validity of yet another crazy conspiracy theory, but promptly move to address this error – by taking down the webpage.

THE FROZEN CLIMATE VIEWS OF THE IPCC [B1]

The Climate Intelligence Foundation (CLINTEL) has cataloged significant errors in the UN IPCC AR6 Summary for Policy Makers (SPM) and distributed this error listing and analysis to the IPCC Chair and other world leaders to inform them of these errors. The identified errors result in the SPM failing to meet standards of objective scientific integrity and therefore misleads world leaders regarding appropriate climate policy by erroneously pointing to a “climate crisis” that does not exist in reality. The seriously flawed SPM is “inappropriately being used to justify drastic social, economic and human changes through severe mitigation, while prudent adaptation” would be much more appropriate.

The SPM claim that human influence alone has warmed the planet is unequivocally false with this claim ignoring natural climate influences including impacts of solar variability, natural events such as ENSO, El Niño, La Niña, AMO, etc. as well as impacts from geomagnetic storms, earthquakes, tsunamis and volcanic eruptions in addition to other areas of evidence addressed in the CLINTEL report [that have been systematically ignored by the IPCC].

David Siegel: “It’s clear that CO2 has almost nothing to do with climate” [B2]

CLINTEL, a global network of critical scientists and engineers, has a simple message:

“There is no climate emergency.” Yes, climate change exists and cannot be ignored, but CLINTEL emphasises that there is NO cause for panic and NO cause for alarm. The CLINTEL scientists strongly oppose the misleading, unrealistic, and destructive global net-zero CO2 policy (“NetZero”). “CO2 budgets are not based on science, but they are based on fear. They destroy the energy system, limit human rights, feed extremism and push mankind into a deep physical, mental, and financial crisis.”

“We still don’t know what really drives our climate. There’s no way we can predict the next 100 years of climate with any accuracy. … it’s clear that CO2 has almost nothing to do with climate, and the big drivers are orbital mechanics and plate tectonics. But there’s still a lot to learn. I’d love to follow the money. I’d love to see a big report showing how money flows to NGOs, how much the UN spends on public relations, how universities rely on the Climate Industrial Complex, and how motivated most groups are by money, not by helping the environment. If they are going to use polar bears, forest fires, storms, and lies, it’s clear their goal is fundraising. And there is a lot of money at stake now.” (Siegel)

How The War on Climate Change Destroyed the Environmental Movement [B1]

The climate issues and pollution issues are being exploited by the World Economic Forum and Bill Gates and all of these big Mega billionaires the same way that COVID was exploited. To use it as an excuse to clamp down — top down totalitarian controls on society and to then to give us ‘engineering’ solutions. And if you look closely as it turns out, the guys who are promoting those engineering solutions are the people who own the IPs, the patents for those solutions. They’ve given climate chaos a bad name because people now see that it’s just another crisis that’s being used to strip mine the wealth of the poor and to enrich billionaires.

Neoliberalism’s Playbook: Control, Crisis and Compliance. Endgame Logic of Late Capitalism [C2]

The masses are being conditioned to get used to lower living standards and accept them. Meanwhile, the framework is in place to ensure that huge corporations and the super-rich continue to rake in near-record profits through militarism, an energy transition, a food transition, speculative finance schemes involving land, carbon trading, data monetisation, surveillance capital, pharmaceuticals, green bonds, commodities and agribusiness, real estate and climate risk derivatives. And there is always money available for Ukraine and various destabilisations around the world to further ensure the bottom line of giant corporations.

CLIMATEGATE: A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY [C2]

Currently, the push for a global government rests on three pillars, Global Warming is one of them, leading to a surrendering of national sovereignty attempted at the Copenhagen Conference December 7th, 2009 (but temporarily delayed when the conference was hit with a major blizzard). The other two pillars exploited to create the “need” for a global government are a global swine-flu pandemic, requiring a global health organization, and a global financial crisis, requiring a global bank.²

Covid and Climate Change: A tale of two global crises [B1]

When reflecting on Covid-19 and anthropogenic climate change, a surprising number of parallels are revealed. This article explores some of these similarities, and considers the role of global crisis narratives in creating the conditions for increasing levels of centralised coordination and control. Both the SARS-CoV-2 virus and carbon dioxide (CO₂) are invisible agents, which are blamed for the 2020 global pandemic and climate change respectively. Their mechanisms of action cannot be directly observed by ordinary people. German sociologist Ulrich Beck was prompted by the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear disaster to explore the societal impact of the many anonymous and invisible threats of global scope resulting from modernity.

He argued that, in what he called a ‘risk society’, people had become radically dependent on specialised scientific knowledge to define what was and what was not dangerous. Today, as members of the public, we are instructed to ‘trust the experts’ who tell us that these invisible agents are responsible for untold damages to human health and the Earth’s climate. We willingly consume the cartoon depictions of a malicious SARS-CoV-2 virus, and images of chimneys belching particulates as truthful illustrations of these invisible deadly enemies.

Studies debunking the Climate Change narrative

A Critical Review of Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on the U.S. Climate [A1]

Attribution of climate change or extreme weather events to human CO2 emissions is challenged by natural climate variability, data limitations, and inherent model deficiencies [Chapter 8]. Moreover, solar activity’s contribution to the late 20th century warming might be underestimated [Section 8.3.1]. Both models and experience suggest that CO2-induced warming might be less damaging economically than commonly believed, and excessively aggressive mitigation policies could prove more detrimental than beneficial [Chapters 9, 10, Section 11.1]. Social Cost of Carbon estimates, which attempt to quantify the economic damage of CO2 emissions, are highly sensitive to their underlying assumptions and so provide limited independent information [Section 11.2]. U.S. policy actions are expected to have undetectably small direct impacts on the global climate and any effects will emerge only with long delays [Chapter 12].

Also refer this INTERVIEW. Dr. Judith Curry on Global Warming: Where Is the Danger? [B2]

“The lives lost per 100,000 people from weather and climate extremes have dropped by two orders of magnitude. So, you know, we’ve managed to do quite well during the first 1.3 degrees of warming. So if we were to see another 1.3 degrees of warming, which is the current best estimate from the UN climate negotiators by 2100, is there any reason to think that would be any worse than the first 1.3 degrees of warming?” Dr Judith Curry asks a simple question.

Many widely held beliefs, such as the notion that a climate crisis or global warming is causing more extreme weather, are simply false. The sea level rise is insignificant. “So where is the danger?” Curry asks. She also points out that until we better understand natural climate variability, we can’t be very confident about stating how much of the warming is human-caused. According to her we don’t have a good enough understanding of a number of issues, e.g. how big is the Sun’s influence on climate, or what is the effect of ocean circulations etc. Therefore the widely used narrative of 97% of scientists agreeing that we are facing a man-made climate crisis is, according to Curry, simply a joke.

A Critique of the Apocalyptic Climate Narrative [B1]

The apocalyptic climate narrative is a seriously misleading propaganda tool and a socially destructive guide for public policy. The narrative radically overstates the risks to humanity of continued global warming, which are manageable, not existential. It prescribes large-scale near-term suppression of fossil-fuel use, while failing to recognize the huge costs that such suppression would inflict on humans because fossil fuels are currently irreplaceable inputs for producing food (via ammonia-based fertilizer), steel, cement, and plastics.

Physics debunks climate alarmism: CO2 cannot overheat the planet – IT FEEDS THE WORLD [B1]

For decades, fearmongering politicians, corporate elites, and captured media have weaponized climate science to justify draconian regulations, wealth redistribution, and the destruction of modern energy systems. Yet two of the world’s leading physicists — MIT’s Richard Lindzen and Princeton’s William Happer — have dismantled the so-called “climate crisis” with irrefutable physics. Their groundbreaking research proves that rising CO2 levels cannot cause dangerous warming or extreme weather — but they do dramatically increase global food production, greening the planet and fighting starvation.

Also refer Just 0.3% of Scientists agree Humanity is causing Climate Change; NOT 97% as falsely spread by the UN [B2]

Only 0.3% of science papers state humans are the cause of climate change. And when surveyed, only 18% of scientists believed that a large amount – or all – of additional climate change could be averted.

and 1900 Scientists Say ‘Climate Change Not Caused by CO2’ – The Real Environment Movement Was Hijacked [B2]

However, many scientists dispute the UN-promoted man-made climate change theory , and many people worldwide are confused by the subject, or are unaware of the full facts.³

The ‘Climate Emergency’ Is a Myth, Says Nobel Prize Winner John Clauser. Here’s Why He’s Right [B1]

Also refer There is no climate emergency [A1]

World Climate Declaration – 1609 signatories (by experts)

To believe the outcome of a climate model is to believe what the model makers have put in. This is precisely the problem of today’s climate discussion to which climate models are central. Climate science has degenerated into a discussion based on beliefs, not on sound self-critical science. Should not we free ourselves from the naive belief in immature climate models?

Also refer A critique of the apocalyptic climate narrative [B2]

This paper details the flaws in the Apocalyptic climate narrative, including why the threat from human-caused climate change is not dire and why urgent suppression of fossil-fuel use would be unwise. We argue that sensible public policies would focus instead on developing a diversified portfolio of energy sources to support greater resilience and flexibility to respond to whatever weather and climate extremes might occur. We identify nine principles for sensible US public policies toward energy and discuss implications of the flaws in the narrative for investors and their agents.

and In Their Own Words: Climate Alarmists Debunk Their ‘Science’ [B2]

A remark from Maurice Strong, who organized the first U.N. Earth Climate Summit (1992) in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil revealed the real goal: “We may get to the point where the only way of saving the world will be for industrialized civilization to collapse.”

Further, Maurice Strong announced an urgent need for the world population to be deliberately “stabilised” (short clip below). United Nations’ Agenda 2030 which is driving the changes we see occurring rapidly now, from pandemic preparedness to climate change restrictions and policing of citizens who speak out, began at the Earth Summit. Learn more about Agenda 2030 from this presentation by Sandi Adams. [C3]

Also refer Climate scientists officially declare ‘climate emergency’ at an end [C2]

The communiqué, drafted by the eminent scientists and researchers who spoke at the conference, makes clear that for several decades climate scientists have systematically exaggerated the influence of CO on global temperature. The high-level scientific conference also declared:

“The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which excludes participants and published papers disagreeing with its narrative, fails to comply with its own error-reporting protocol and draws conclusions some of which are dishonest, should be forthwith dismantled.”

A Critical Reassessment of the Anthropogenic CO₂-Global Warming Hypothesis: Empirical Evidence Contradicts IPCC Models and Solar Forcing Assumptions [B1]

Our analysis reveals that human CO₂ emissions, constituting a mere 4% of the annual carbon cycle, are dwarfed by natural fluxes, with isotopic signatures and residence time data indicating negligible long-term atmospheric retention. Moreover, individual CMIP3 (2005-2006), CMIP5 (2010-2014), and CMIP6 (2013-2016) model runs consistently fail to replicate observed temperature trajectories and sea ice extent trends, exhibiting correlations (R²) near zero when compared to unadjusted records.

A critical flaw emerges in the IPCC’s reliance on a single, low-variability Total Solar Irradiance (TSI) reconstruction, despite the existence of 27 viable alternatives, where higher-variability options align closely with observed warming—itself exaggerated by data adjustments. We conclude that the anthropogenic CO₂-Global Warming hypothesis lacks empirical substantiation, overshadowed by natural drivers such as temperature feedbacks and solar variability, necessitating a fundamental reevaluation of current climate paradigms.

It’s about to get colder and CO2 levels may drop to dangerously unproductive levels [B2]

David Dilley, a climatologist with extensive experience discusses numerous factors contributing to climate change, arguing that natural cycles and cosmic events, rather than human activities, are the primary drivers. Dilley highlights historical climate patterns, solar cycles, ocean temperatures, and natural phenomena that he believes will lead to a period of global cooling starting around 2030. He concludes by emphasizing the need for a paradigm shift in climate research funding to focus more on natural causes rather than on human-induced factors.

Suppression of science: former NOAA meteorologist says employees were cautioned not to talk about natural cycles [B2]

Earth’s temperature changes seasonally due to the seasonal tilt of the earth, with longer term cycles due to the PFM Natural Pulse cycles every 10-years, 230 years and 130 thousand years. Carbon dioxide concentrations are a naturally occurring cycle connected to the short-term global warming cycles that occur approximately every 230 years, and the longer term 130 thousand year glacial and inter-glacial cycles.

The eBook written by Mr. Dilley of GWO (available on the Natural Pulse Page) illustrates that earth’s current temperatures and carbon dioxide levels are perfectly normal for global warming cycle that was occurring up to the year 2012 (now beginning to slip into global cooling for the next 150 years).

Food is under attack too

The Real Purpose of Net Zero [B2]

Thomas Malthus was the East India Company’s first economist training individuals for service as administrators for the organization. Malthus was also a eugenicist in the economic wheelhouse of the world’s largest corporate monopoly with its own private army. He wrote the following in his 1798 Essay on the Principle of Population:

The power of population is so superior to the power in the earth to produce subsistence for man, that premature death must in some shape or other visit the human race. The vices of mankind are active and able ministers of depopulation. They are the precursors in the great army of destruction; and often finish the dreadful work themselves. But should they fail in this war of extermination, sickly seasons, epidemics, pestilence, and plague, advance in terrific array, and sweep off their thousands and ten thousands. Should success be still incomplete, gigantic inevitable famine stalks in the rear, and with one mighty blow levels the population with the food of the world.

Without food, food production, and farming, there is famine. It’s that simple. The failed pandemic response was a reminder of that. It has been assumed that leaders and policymakers, especially the United Nations, know these basic historical and current facts. Farmers are becoming endangered because of government policy to meet ‘climate goals’ and it’s being allowed to happen.

Also refer The Comfortable Collapse: How America Learned to Pretend Obesity Is Normal [B2]

The data tell the story with unflinching clarity. In 1960, the average American man weighed 166 pounds, while the average woman weighed 140 pounds. By 2002, men averaged 191 pounds and women 164 pounds, representing gains of more than 20 pounds per person in a single generation. Height increased by about an inch during the same period, which is nowhere near enough to explain the mass increase. Obesity prevalence, once a marginal condition, ballooned in parallel. In the early 1960s, about 13 percent of adults met criteria for obesity. By 2010, the figure had reached 36 percent. Today, more than 40 percent of US adults live with obesity.

This is not a slight cultural drift. It is a wholesale population-level transformation, visible everywhere and confirmed by every credible dataset. The costs are staggering. Annual medical expenditures attributable to obesity are estimated at $173 billion in the United States. Adults with obesity generate, on average, nearly $1,900 more in health costs per year than their normal-weight peers[6-7]. These figures capture only direct medical spending. They do not reflect lost productivity, shortened lifespans, military unfitness, or the millions of families silently managing the downstream complications: diabetes, heart disease, liver failure, sleep apnea, infertility, and cancer.

Signs they are CREATING a food crisis [C2]

A war which did not need to happen is driving up food and oil prices.
Sanctions which did not need to be put in place are also driving up food and oil prices.
Western allies are intentionally raising their oil prices.
Despite warning of a food crisis, US and UK are paying farmers not to farm.
A “bird flu epidemic” very much like the fake Covid “pandemic” is driving up the price of poultry and eggs.
Western companies are actively making the fertiliser shortages worse.
Bizarre fires are crippling large sections of the US food industry.

You can also add the numerous farmer protests around the world at government policies on Net Zero / Climate Change, increases in the cost of diesel (more tax) and inheritance (more tax) as highlighting threats to farmers and therefore food security. A given is the millions of people in poor countries that starved as a result of the economic hit provided by the covid response around the world.

Also refer Trump’s Destruction of US Economy, Starting with Agriculture. Prof. Michael Hudson [B3]

Trump has created a crisis for U.S. agriculture with his Cold War weaponization of foreign trade with China and Russia… The most notorious example is soybeans, America’s major farm export to China… So the question is, what is to become of the enormous amount of U.S. farmland that has been devoted to soybean production? Unable to find foreign markets to replace China, farmers are reported to suffer a loss on their soybean production, which is piling up in excess of existing crop storage capacity. The result is a threat of farm foreclosures and bankruptcy, which would lower prices for farmland. And as interest rates remain high for long-term loans such as mortgages, this deters small farmers from acquiring troubled properties. The result is to accelerate the concentration of farmland in the hands of large absentee financial funds and the wealthy. US Farmers Are Reportedly Facing The Worst Economic Downturn In At Least 50 Years [as of 29 September 2025].⁴

It’s Not a Broken System—From Food to Development, It’s a Masterpiece of Control [C2]

The food system is not broken. It is a weapon. And it is intended as such. It concentrates power, severs people from land, deskills and displaces producers and commodifies nourishment. It benefits financial capital and corporate actors while externalising its costs—to health, biodiversity, labour and culture. In the Global South, ‘development’ is the velvet glove of structural dependency. It arrives cloaked in the language of poverty reduction and climate resilience—while deepening indebtedness, consolidating proprietary seed systems and subordinating food sovereignty to export-driven logic.

Sickening Profits: The Global Food System’s Poisoned Food and Toxic Wealth [C2]

This new e-book begins by examining how the modern food system is being shaped by the capitalist imperative for profit, with specific focus on the situation in Ukraine, and discusses the role of the world’s most powerful investment management firm, BlackRock. It then goes on to describe how people (not least children) are being sickened by corporations and a system that thrives on the promotion of ‘junk’ (ultra-processed) food laced with harmful chemicals and the use of toxic agrochemicals. It’s a highly profitable situation for investment firms like BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street, Fidelity and Capital Group and the food conglomerates they invest in. But BlackRock and others are not just heavily invested in the food industry. They also profit from illnesses and diseases resulting from the food system by having stakes in the pharmaceuticals sector as well. A win-win situation.

Suffer Little Children — Poisoned by Pesticides and Damaged by Ultra-Processed Foods [C2]

Baskut Tuncak is a prominent expert and advocate in the field of human rights and environmental law. He has served as the United Nations Special Rapporteur on human rights and hazardous substances and wastes, where he highlighted the human rights impacts of pollution, toxic chemicals, and hazardous waste on vulnerable populations, including children. He stated in a November 2017 article: “Our children are growing up exposed to a toxic cocktail of weedkillers, insecticides, and fungicides. It’s on their food and in their water, and it’s even doused over their parks and playgrounds.”

Also refer New ‘Dirty Dozen’ List Warns About Rising Pesticide Residue in “Common Produce” Including Most Fruits and Vegetables [B3]

Nearly 75% of conventionally grown produce tested by the USDA had pesticide residues, and 96% of the foods on the Dirty Dozen list carried multiple toxic chemical residues even after washing. For the first time, the EWG ranked produce not just by residue quantity, but by how toxic the detected pesticides are when combined and consumed, offering a far more accurate exposure risk. Pesticide regulation still evaluates chemicals one at a time, ignoring how daily exposure to multiple residues amplifies harmful effects on your nervous system, hormones, and DNA. Children, infants, and unborn babies face the highest risks from contaminated produce due to their size, developmental stage, and inability to effectively detox pesticide chemicals.

and 47 Pesticides Found in U.S. Homes, Water ,and People — As Congress Moves to Shield Manufacturers [B2]

A new peer-reviewed study in Environmental Science & Technology has delivered awake-up call: our homes are not safe havens from pesticide exposure. Researchers tested indoor dust, drinking water, and urine from 81 U.S. households and found that 47 current-use pesticides (CUPs) — including insecticides, herbicides, and fungicides— are now part of our everyday environment and our biology. Despite being marketed as “safer” replacements for banned legacy pesticides like DDT, these chemicals are emerging as toxic threats to both wildlife and human health, with links to cancer, neurotoxicity, endocrine disruption, and reproductive harm.

Food, Dispossession and Dependency [C2]

We are currently seeing an acceleration of the corporate consolidation of the entire global agri-food chain. The high-tech/big data conglomerates, including Amazon, Microsoft, Facebook and Google, have joined traditional agribusiness giants, such as Corteva, Bayer, Cargill and Syngenta, in a quest to impose their model of food and agriculture on the world. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is also involved (documented in ‘Gates to a Global Empire‘ by Navdanya International), whether through buying up huge tracts of farmland, promoting a much-heralded (but failed) ‘green revolution’ for Africa, pushing biosynthetic food and genetic engineering technologies or more generally facilitating the aims of the mega agri-food corporations. Of course, the billionaire interests behind this try to portray what they are doing as some kind of humanitarian endeavour – saving the planet with ‘climate-friendly solutions’, ‘helping farmers’ or ‘feeding the world’.⁵

Also refer Global Push To Reshape Agriculture, Human Diets So Every Nation’s Food Supply Fits Within ‘Sustainable’ And ‘Planetary Boundaries’ [C2]

Now, we have an interesting article posted on 6 October 2025 by Modernity News. Modernity cites a report in The Lancet, titled ‘The EAT-Lancet Commission on Healthy, Sustainable, and Just Food Systems’, which presents what the authors call “a great food transformation.” Modernity points out that this is part of a coordinated global programme (as promoted by the United Nations, Rockefeller and Gates foundations, and World Economic Forum) to reshape agriculture, human diets and financing so that every nation’s food supply fits within quantified “planetary boundaries.” Modernity adds:

The food-system power grab comes as the same network of government agencies and Gates-funded projects are already re-engineering the genetic code of crops themselves, turning destructive plant viruses into self-replicating DNA platforms, illustrating how the push for “sustainability” and “climate-smart” agriculture doubles as a bid to centralise control over both the seeds in the ground and the food on our plates.

The Lancet paper’s declared funders include the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, Wellcome Trust, IKEA Foundation and Children’s Investment Fund Foundation, whose grants financed the work through the EAT Foundation in Oslo. The Lancet argues that controlling food systems is the key to controlling every major sector, linking nutrition, climate, economics, and governance under one unified global framework. Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair and Oracle founder Larry Ellison were talking about just such a system at the World Governments Summit earlier this year, where they called for a centralised data system run by AI for all nations. [Maybe a “food” based system in a Blair led Gaza using an Ellison edited Tiktok data system. That might fly…]

People and organisations in the global network controlling corporations, covid, climate change and food supply [B1]

In 2011, a Swiss study on the global corporate control network found that 147 companies in Europe controlled 40% of the world’s wealth. A large portion of that control flows into a small, tightly-knit core of financial institutions. The most concentrated control emanated from the British financial multinational Barclays. To put this study into a broader context, we also briefly describe the network of people and organisations responsible for the covid scam, the climate scam and the handful of corporations controlling the world’s food supply.

In 2022, the ETC Group published their report ‘Food Barons 2022 – Crisis Profiteering, Digitalisation and Shifting Power’.⁶ Their findings showed that “many agrifood sectors are now so ‘top heavy’ they are controlled by just four to six dominant firms, enabling these companies to wield enormous influence over markets, agricultural research and policy development, which undermines food sovereignty.” We also bring attention to three critical, multi-sectoral trends that increase the ability of the Food Barons – Big Ag, together with Big Tech and Big Finance – to maintain control over the Industrial Food Chain.

Also refer Monopolisation of agriculture: A handful of corporations control the inputs and outputs of American farmers [C3]

The monopolisation of the agricultural sector has led to limited choices for consumers, high prices and tremendous political power for companies. Four companies, for example, control over 85% of beef and 70% of pork products. In addition to sandwiching farmers between companies that monopolise farmers’ inputs and outputs, legislation regarding farmers’ subsidies has been influenced by large agricultural companies. Government subsidies primarily benefit large farmers and corporations, while smaller farmers struggle to survive.

Fake Meat, Fake Breastmilk and Food Shortages [B2]

Fake food is being poised as a panacea to end world hunger and food shortages, but there’s nothing miraculous about synthetic, lab-made food. It can’t compare to food that comes from nature in terms of nutrition or environmental protection, and as we’re seeing with the mysterious infant formula shortages, when you’re dependent on fake food, your very survival is also dependent on the handful of companies that manufacture them. The fact remains that when (just a few) private companies control the food supply, they will also ultimately control countries and entire populations. Biotech will eventually push farmers and ranchers out of the equation and will threaten food security and human health. In other words, the work being done in the name of sustainability and saving the planet will give greater control to private corporations while weakening the population.

Food Standards in Australia and New Zealand are being changed so real food can be replaced with fake “food” [C3]

The global mafia is trying to replace our real food with a fake gene-edited variety, without even telling us it is doing so. It wants to change regulations so that natural food and genetically modified (“GM”) laboratory food are legally regarded as the same thing! The author explains that FSANZ, Australia and New Zealand’s food authority, is proposing changes to the Food Standards Code which would deregulate gene-edited foods and deny customers any labelling.

Global Food Security Update: May to September 2025 [B2]

In 2025, the global outlook for acute food insecurity is driven by a convergence of protracted conflict, economic volatility, and adverse weather conditions. While the nature, combination and severity of shocks varies by context, the compounded impacts continue to disrupt food systems, constrain access to typical livelihood activities, and impede humanitarian operations. Conflict remains the most severe and widespread driver, particularly in settings with protracted violence or rising geopolitical tensions in East Africa, the Middle East, the Sahel, Central Africa, and Haiti. The intersection of insecurity, inflation, and limited humanitarian access presents critical concerns across the most affected regions.

Analysis from the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) projects that shifts in trade policy could lead to a contraction in global agricultural trade of 3.3-4.7 percent and a decline in global GDP of 0.3-0.4 percent, with more severe impacts if retaliatory measures are implemented. These trade dynamics may reshape global agricultural market flows.

So Who “hates” the Environment?

The Rockefeller Way: The Family’s Covert ‘Climate Change’ Plan [B2]

Since the beginning of their philanthropic endeavors, the Rockefellers have used social causes to amass influence in policy areas of their choosing. Since the 1980s [if not prior], their cause of choice has been the climate change agenda (originally called global warming). Their crusade to collapse the fossil fuel industry in favor of renewable energy is well-documented, from their involvement in major global climate treaties and organizations – the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in 1992 to the 1997 Kyoto Protocol – to spending hundreds of millions to advance the renewable energy industry. Through their Sustainable Development Program, the Rockefellers continue to promote their self-serving “clean energy” policies throughout both the federal government and general public.

Agrichemical Pesticides, Nano Plastics, Pulsed Microwaves and Neurotechnologies [C2]

Mankind today is faced by a quite bewildering minefield of toxicity which ever way one turns. Over the years ‘we the people’ have backed ourselves into an unforgiving corner from which it is increasingly hard to escape. We have got into this corner by refusing to ditch the naive assumption that government and
corporate industry have our best interests at heart – and would never ‘knowingly’ allow onto the market anything which is inherently harmful. [Sadly] Governments and corporations have long since ceased taking any interest in promoting the best means to achieve a world in which quality of life is not sacrificed for the quantification of material assets.

Also refer Viral RNA-based sprays for plants have unknown consequences [C2]

Terrana Biosciences is on a mission to replace pesticides with its RNA-based sprays as “vaccines” for plants to protect crops from pests and diseases. The RNA is taken from plant viruses. Terrana claims its sprays do not alter the plant genome and merely deliver RNA into plants to stimulate an immune response or produce protective proteins. But in reality, they don’t know, as there have been no long-term safety studies. The company describes its products as: “Terrana sources native RNAs from across the plant world and gives them new instructions to make any desired trait and solve for problems at any point in the plant’s lifecycle,” which indicates their true aim. Michelle Perro explains that RNA sprays are more dangerous than GMO crops.⁷ Key points:⁸

Flagship Pioneering, Moderna’s parent company, has launched Terrana Biosciences to spray crops with synthetic RNA designed to enter plants, alter their biology, and potentially pass traits to future generations.
The technology relies on AI-generated RNA libraries, mirroring the same mRNA platform used in Moderna’s COVID-19 shots, raising concerns about unintended consequences in the food chain.
Documents reveal past plans by government-linked entities like EcoHealth Alliance to aerosolize biological agents over human populations, suggesting a disturbing precedent for covert RNA deployment.
The PREP Act grants the U.S. government sweeping authority to administer experimental drugs and biologics without consent during emergencies, leaving the door open for forced RNA interventions.
Critics warn that chronic exposure to AI-designed RNA in food could have unknown long-term health effects, as these molecules were engineered for manipulation, not human consumption.

The Deadly Campaign to Shield All Pesticides from Legal Liability [B1]

In 2018, Bayer (one of the world’s largest pharmaceutical companies) acquired Monsanto. This backfired, as due to the billions in Roundup judgments (likely to far exceed 16 billion), Bayer rapidly lost two-thirds of its value. To save the company Bayer (which, like Monsanto, has a long history of unscrupulous conduct) is conducting a variety of measures to end those lawsuits within the Courts, States, Congress, and EPA. Many of these involve creating liability shields which make it impossible to ever sue a pesticide manufacturer for being seriously injured by their product, even if the manufacturer deliberately concealed this known toxicity. These actions eerily parallel the ‘National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986‘, a “well-intended” act which rather than lead to safer vaccines, unleashed the modern era of chronic disease upon America. Presently a bill is working its way through Congress containing a covert provision designed to shield Bayer (and many other manufacturers) from these lawsuits.

Monsanto was heavily invested in dioxins (e.g., DD and Agent Orange), which they knew were extremely toxic but claimed were “safe.” Monsanto also began producing Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) in 1929, and before long produced over 99% of America’s. Despite knowing their toxicity as early as the 1930s (and definitely by the 1960s), Monsanto continually claimed they were safe, and only stopped selling them in 1977 shortly before a 1979 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ban due to their toxicity and environmental persistence.⁹ ¹⁰ ¹¹ ¹² Where do these toxins, that last for decades if not centuries, get left?

“Superfund sites” designate places too contaminated by hazardous wastes (e.g., toxic chemicals) for general human habitation. In 1995, of America’s 1,238 Superfund sites, 190 had PCB contamination and 80 had dioxin contamination. Sadly, these are not Monsanto’s only Superfund contributions (e.g., they’ve contaminated numerous areas with heavy metals, arsenic, radium and benzenes. Monsanto has also produced other problematic persistent chemicals. These include Acetochlor and Propachlor, carcinogenic herbicides which persist in the environment (one of which was taken off the market), and Lasso, another problematic herbicide that was phased out. [Like the environmental damage caused by most big industries, the local populations get left paying for it financially and health-wise]

EU Explores Withdrawing Glyphosate Approval over New Shocking Cancer Study [C2]

Dutch farmers’ organization LTO has called for a rapid assessment of the new international study. If the findings are confirmed, the LTO said the product’s approval “must be withdrawn immediately”, Trouw quoted the organization as saying. Glyphosate is widely used by Dutch farmers in both the food and flower industry. The comprehensive carcinogenicity study, which has caused this reaction from the European Commission and farming groups across the EU, involved scientists from Europe and the U.S., and found that low doses of the controversial weed killer cause multiple types of cancer in rats.

MIT Scientist Sounds Alarm: Glyphosate Tied to Autism, Cancer, Infertility, and Even Wildfires [B2]

Glyphosate, produced by Monsanto (now Bayer), is not only used on genetically modified “Roundup Ready” crops but increasingly as a desiccant, sprayed on non-GMO grains, legumes, and even sugar cane to speed harvests. Independent testing, including by Moms Across America, has detected glyphosate in:

100% of fast-food samples tested
95% of public school lunches
One-third of breast milk samples
Human urine samples across North America

The Truth about Weather Modification is Breaking Through [C3]

All around the world awareness is increasing concerning programs to block sunlight and modify the weather by releasing harmful pollutants over populated areas. “It’s done, we think, by DARPA and a lot of it now is coming out of the jet fuel. You know those materials are put in jet fuel“, a quote from JFK Jr.¹³ This approach mirrors what we’ve witnessed in the food and other industries. The malevolent entities influencing air craft jet fuel also dominate food, agricultural, medical, cosmetic and maintenance production. Over recent decades, an increasing number of supermarket products have been found to contain toxic materials, revealing a strategy to poison humanity.

Thousands join anti-geoengineering protest in London, and they have good reason [C3]

In May last year, Dr. Herndon co-authored a paper published in the Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal. The paper presented scientific evidence, including rainwater and snow analyses, showing elevated levels of elements consistent with coal fly ash, suggesting its use in covert atmospheric spraying. Data from laboratory testing of samples of rainwater and snow “strongly suggest that coal fly ash is being used in worldwide covert geoengineering operations,” the authors said. They argued that the use of aerosolised coal fly ash in geoengineering operations is causing widespread environmental damage and poses a severe threat to life on Earth. As an anonymous UK commercial airline pilot told Drake Michigan in a 2023 interview, “The two purposes for chemtrailing are very, very clear. It’s to poison us and block out the sun.”

Other issues impacting our Environment

Ultra-Processed Foods (UPFs) Linked To Brain Changes That Drive Overeating [B2]

The research, recently published in Nature, found that people who consumed more UPFs showed measurable differences in brain areas involved in feeding behavior, emotion, and motivation. Higher UPF intake was linked to increased thickness in the bilateral lateral occipital cortex—a brain region crucial for visual object recognition and processing shapes. This finding suggests changes in how the brain processes visual food cues. “Our findings indicate that a high consumption of ultra-processed foods is associated with structural changes in brain regions regulating eating behaviour, such as the hypothalamus, amygdala and right nucleus accumbens. This may lead to a cycle of overeating” Arsène Kanyamibwa, the study’s first author and doctoral researcher at the University of Helsinki, said in a press statement.

Evidence for the use by Israel of a neutron uranium warhead in Palestine and Lebanon [B2].

Since 2003, measurements made by Green Audit in Fallujah, Iraq 2003, Lebanon 2006 and Gaza 2008 have provided unequivocal evidence of Uranium residues which show anomalous Uranium U-238/U235 isotope signature ratios. Results from independent laboratories in Europe and the UK, using different techniques, revealed the presence of enriched Uranium in biological materials and environmental samples including soil, bomb craters and air (as recorded in vehicle air filter dust). More recently, 2021 results published in the Journal Nature, show that Uranium enrichment levels in background samples from Gaza have been increasing markedly since 2008. It is proposed that the only logical answer is that a Uranium-based weapon exists that produces U-235 by neutron activation and has been deployed. Such a weapon must be some kind of neutron bomb.

Also refer ‘Israel used depleted uranium shells in Syria’ [B2] and Legal issues arising out of the use of depleted uranium in Syria [B2]

MAY 6, 2013 – Israel used depleted uranium shells in the alleged strike in Syria on Sunday, a senior Syrian military source told Russia Today on Monday.

Environmental Warfare and US Foreign Policy: The Ultimate Weapon of Mass Destruction [C2]

Dr. Bernard Eastlund, while working as a consultant for Advanced Power Technologies Inc. (APTI) in the 1980s, patented devices that are described as capable of “causing…total disruption of communications over a very large portion of the Earth…missile or aircraft destruction, deflection or confusion…weather modification…” Some of Eastlund’s patents were temporarily sealed under a US Secrecy Order. APTI and Eastlund’s patents were quickly purchased by E-Systems, a company that is home to many retired and currently employed CIA agents. In 1993 E-Systems received $1.8 billion in classified contracts. Raytheon, the fourth largest US defense contractor and third largest aerospace company, currently holds the patents. In light of the above, it is significant to know that since the early 1990s the US Air Force has been sponsoring the world’s largest ionospheric modification project called HAARP (High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program).

Why Is the Pentagon “Weaponizing Insects”? [B2]

A group of European scientists have published a scientific paper in the October 5 issue of Science magazine, whose lead author is Dr. Guy Reeves of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plön, Germany. The paper notes that the DARPA “Insect Allies” program, “aims to disperse infectious genetically modified viruses that have been engineered to edit crop chromosomes directly in fields.” This is known as “horizontal inheritance,” as opposed to the dominant vertical method of GMO alteration that make laboratory-generated modifications into target species’ chromosomes to create GMO plant varieties. The genetic alterations to the crops would be carried out by “insect-based dispersion” in free nature.

The European scientists point out that no compelling reasons have been presented by DARPA for the use of insects as an uncontrolled means of dispersing synthetic viruses into the environment. Furthermore, they argue that the Insect Allies Program could be more easily used for biological warfare than for routine agricultural use. [Of note, in 1975, Lyme disease emerged in the immediate vicinity of a US government facility which was working on weaponizing the same bacteria which caused the disease. Note: the case Lyme disease was a lab leak is quite strong. Lyme disease is spread by insects – ticks]

The Devastating Environmental Side Effects of the Electric Car Boom [B2]

The United Nations (U.N.) announced in August 2020 that the electric car boom will result in a number of devastating ecological side effects for the planet. The U.N. trade body, UNCTAD, has issued a new report breaking down some of the unintended negative consequences of the shift, which include ecological degradation as well as human rights abuses. The production of these raw materials “is often associated with undesirable environmental footprints, poor human rights and worker protection,” the report asserts. In Chile, for instance, “lithium mining uses nearly 65% of the water in the country’s Salar de Atamaca region, one of the driest desert areas in the world, to pump out brines from drilled wells,” the U.N. notes, because nearly 2 million liters of water are needed to produce a ton of lithium.

International Energy Agency Executive Director Fatih Birol said that in 2018, electric cars saved 40 million tons of CO2 worldwide, sufficient to reduce global temperatures by a mere 0.000018°C — or a little more than a hundred-thousandth of a degree Celsius — by the end of the century. “If you think you can save the climate with electric cars, you’re completely wrong,” Birol said.

Every Dutch person has ‘forever chemicals’ in their blood – study [B2]

PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are a group of human-made chemicals used in products like plastic food wrappers, non-stick cookware, stain resistant fabrics, cleaning agents, and personal care items. Due to their durability, they break down extremely slowly and can persist in the environment and living organisms for years, hence the nickname “forever chemicals.” The survey published on Thursday by the Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), found that “Everyone in the Netherlands has different types of PFAS in the blood. In almost everyone, the amount of PFAS is higher than the health limit value.”

Some data on Net Zero and the Climate Change Hoax:

People want to hear about love for the environmental link

Go Home