Why Judaism vs Zionism Matters: Truth, Justice, and Human Dignity

The equation of Judaism with Zionism harms both Jews and Palestinians. It erases the diversity of Jewish identity, marginalises Jewish dissent, and legitimises apartheid-like conditions in the occupied Palestinian territories. Understanding the distinction in the debate around Judaism vs Zionism is essential to restoring historical truth, promoting justice, and challenging dominant narratives that conflate religion with political ideology. Judaism teaches justice, not nationalism. To defend the rights of all—Jews and Palestinians alike—we must tell the truth about the past and present.¹

Summary: Judaism vs Zionism

• Judaism is a rich, diverse religion and culture, not tied to nationalism.
• Zionism is a political ideology with a contentious and sometimes dark history.
• Jewish voices opposing Zionism have always existed.
• Politicians and media support Zionism due to lobbying, geopolitical alignment, and fear. [with cult ‘funding’ involved in all three]

The debate over Judaism vs Zionism is not only political but deeply personal, affecting how Jews and non-Jews understand identity, justice, and history. One of the most essential distinctions in the Judaism vs Zionism debate lies in how Jewish communities, both religious and secular, have historically resisted the conflation of their faith with a nationalist project. Opposition to Zionism has been a consistent, if marginalised, current within Jewish thought, spanning religious and secular spectrums. Many Jews believe Zionism distorts Judaism’s spiritual mission and universal ethics. For example:

Also refer Why I Object To The ‘Jewishness’ Of Israel [F3]

This is not an academic point. The Israeli soul is the scene of struggle between two forces, between two loyalties: That to the land and that to the worldwide Jewish people. The loyalty to the land can eventually form a basis for complete unity with the native Palestinian people. The loyalty to world Jewry (Am Israel) is the basis of our xenophobia, of the Wall, of the apartheid state. The Palestinians are denied equal rights in order to sustain the “Jewish character” of the state. The ugliest crimes of Zionism are perpetrated in the name of the Jewish People; “Jewishness” is the engine of ethnic cleansing in our country. Thus our struggle against “the Jewish character of the state” is an important spiritual element in the struggle for democracy in Palestine. There is a second reason for my hostility to “Jewishness” — this concept is used to frighten ordinary Americans, Brits and Europeans away from their support of equality in Palestine by attaching the anti-Semitism stigma to it. The tide of pro-Israeli support led us, in my belief, to the destruction of Palestine and Iraq and will soon lead to an attack on Iran. [as in 2004]

From the same author, Israel Shamir: ²

Torat ha-Melech – (Royal Torah) – the book of Kosher rules on how to kill gentile children.³ It’s hard reading. It was published in Israel in 2009; the authorities tried to forbid it and persecuted the authors – two honourable Rabbis, Yitzhak Shapira and Yosef Elitzur. But this effort came to naught, for the religious Jews insisted it is true presentation of the Jewish faith. Now … equipped with the Netanyahu Postulate [that this particular ‘blood libel’ (death of children in Gaza) is no different from all previous blood libels] we can reconsider Jewish history. After the Jews killed Our Lord Jesus Christ, they killed many people; the first was St. Stephen and the last is a child in Gaza. But they were most famous for the lending of money. This is also a form of killing, for St Ambrose in his commentary (Deut. 23:19) wrote:

“From him exact usury whom it would not be a crime to kill. Where there is a right of war, there also is a right of usury”.

[I found this to be both abhorrent and eye opening. It does explain a lot about why genocide is taking place, given quotes from this book by Israeli Zionist leaders]

The vast majority of Jews have [however] sought to live peacefully in countries around the world for thousands of years, including in Islamic countries. Antisemitism is [defined as] hatred of Jews;⁴ Zionism is a political ideology [despite current efforts by Zionists to conflate the two]. Many Jews, including rabbis and Holocaust survivors, oppose Zionism.⁵ Jews are diverse, comprising Ashkenazi, Sephardi, Mizrahi, Ethiopian Jews and more.

Not all Jews are religious; many are cultural, secular, or spiritual. Early Zionists were predominantly secular Ashkenazi Jews who saw statehood as the path to normalising Jewish existence. In 1948, the State of Israel was declared. The event was a triumph for Zionists but a catastrophe (Nakba) for Palestinians, with over 700,000 displaced [and killed]. The founding of Israel was accompanied by ethnic cleansing, martial law over Arab citizens, and a growing militarised nationalism.

Zionism had evolved from a political movement into a state apparatus, tightly bound to militarism, land acquisition, and religious justification, despite its secular origins. One of the most essential distinctions in the Judaism vs Zionism debate lies in how Jewish communities, both religious and secular, have historically resisted the conflation of their faith with a nationalist project. Opposition to Zionism has been a consistent, if marginalised, current within Jewish thought, spanning religious and secular spectrums. Many Jews believe Zionism distorts Judaism’s spiritual mission and universal ethics. Unfortunately, the cult have none of the latter.⁶

Some Cult History and Geopolitical Highlights

By 1694, when the privately-owned Bank of England was founded, what soon became Great Britain had been taken over by international financial predators (now predominantly the cult), practicing the system of fractional reserve banking that utilised usury augmented by compound interest to generate their unending, undeserved profits. This was essentially a method of grand larceny accomplished by creating paper money “out of thin air” with a small amount of gold as backing (i.e., the “gold standard”). [every bank deposit – a loan to the bank – was leveraged multiple times]

According to William Guy Carr,⁷ in his book “Pawns In The Game“, the initial meeting of … ex officio planners (for the cult’s revolution) took place in Mayer Amschel Bauer’s Goldsmith Shop in Frankfurt in 1773. Bauer, who adopted the name of “Rothschild” or Red Shield, from the red shield which he hung over his door to advertise his business (the red shield today is the official coat of arms of the City of Frankfurt), was only thirty years of age when he invited twelve other wealthy and influential men to meet him in Frankfurt. His purpose was to convince them that if they agreed to pool their resources they could then finance and control the ‘World Revolutionary Movement‘ and use it as their ‘Manual of Action’ to win ultimate control of the wealth, natural resources, and manpower of the entire world.

This agreement reached, Mayer unfolded his revolutionary plan. The project would be backed by all the power that could be purchased with their pooled resources. By clever manipulation of their combined wealth it would be possible to create such adverse economic conditions that the masses would be reduced to a state bordering on starvation by unemployment… Their paid propagandists would arouse feelings of hatred and revenge against the ruling classes by exposing all real and alleged cases of extravagance, licentious conduct, injustice, oppression, and persecution. They would also invent infamies to bring into disrepute others who might, if left alone, interfere with their overall plans… Rothschild apparently presented a manuscript with a carefully prepared plan of action.⁸ This was said to comprise of 24 or 25 items [which likely reflect “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion“],^{9 10} summarised as: [with any alternative source not in bold, and possible examples in [] brackets]¹¹

• 1. Use violence and terrorism rather than academic discussions. He argued that LAW was FORCE only in disguise. He reasoned it was logical to conclude ‘By the laws of nature right lies in force.‘ [e.g. ‘forever’ wars]
  2. Preach “Liberalism” to usurp political power. Political freedom is an idea, not a fact. In order to usurp political power all that was necessary was to preach ‘Liberalism’ so that the electorate, for the sake of an idea, would yield some of their power and prerogatives which the plotters could then gather into their own hands. [issues of inequality, ie BLM]
  3. Initiate class warfare. The speaker asserted that the Power of Gold had usurped the power of Liberal rulers…. He pointed out that it was immaterial to the success of his plan whether the established governments were destroyed by external or internal foes because the victor had to of necessity ask the aid of ‘Capital’ which ‘is entirely in our hands‘. [two tier justice]
  4. Politicians must be cunning and deceptive “any moral code leaves a politician vulnerable“. (He argued that the use of any and all means to reach their final goal was justified on the grounds that the ruler who governed by the moral code was not a skilled politician because he left himself vulnerable and in an unstable position.) [European Commission]
  5. Dismantle “existing forces of order and regulation. Reconstruct all existing institutions.” He asserted that ‘Our right lies in force. The word RIGHT is an abstract thought and proves nothing. I find a new RIGHT… to attack by the Right of the Strong, to reconstruct all existing institutions, and to become the sovereign Lord of all those who left to us the Rights to their powers by laying them down to us in their liberalism. [WHO, NATO, etc]
  6. Remain invisible until the very moment when it has gained such strength that no cunning or force can undermine it. The power of our resources must remain invisible until the very moment when it has gained such strength that no cunning or force can undermine it. [Who owns the IMF and World Bank?]
  • [This goal, supported by deception, the use of ‘mob psychology’ and propaganda through ownership of the media is likely why little is known about cult proprietors, methodologies and objectives]
• 7. Use Mob Psychology to control the masses. “Without absolute despotism one cannot rule efficiently.” [Covid propaganda ]
  8. Advocate the use of alcoholic liquors, drugs, moral corruption and all forms of vice, used systematically by “agenteurs” to corrupt the youth. (Dealt with the use of alcoholic liquors, drugs, moral corruption, and all vice to systematically corrupt youth of all nations. [addiction / porn, attack religion and family values]
  9. Seize properties by any means to secure submission and sovereignty. They had the right to seize property by any means, and without hesitation, if by doing so they secured submission and sovereignty. [interest rate bubbles / private equity firms]
  10. Foment wars and control the peace conferences so that neither of the combatants gains territory placing them further in debt and therefore into our power. Wars should be directed so that the nations engaged on both sides should be further in our debt. [WW2, regime changes]
• 11. Choose candidates for public office who will be “servile and obedient to our commands, so they may be readily used as pawns in our game.” Candidates for public office should be servile and obedient to our commands, so that they may readily be used. [neocons, sponsored by AIPAC]
  12. Use the Press for propaganda to control all outlets of public information, while remaining in the shadows, clear of blame. Propaganda— their combined wealth would control all outlets of public information. [legacy media / TNI]
  13. Make the masses believe they had been the prey of criminals. Then restore order to appear as the saviors. [9/11, Iraq war]
• 14. Panics and financial depressions would ultimately result in World Government, a new order of one world government. Create financial panics. Use hunger to control, to subjugate the masses. [1930s great depression, 1970s inflation]
  15. Infiltrate Freemasonry to take advantage of the Grand Orient Lodges to cloak the true nature of their work in philanthropy. Spread their atheistic-materialistic ideology amongst the “Goyim” (gentiles).¹² [ J. Edgar Hoover, ADL]
  16. When the hour strikes for our sovereign lord of the entire World to be crowned, their influence will banish everything that might stand in his way. [Israel?]
  17. Use systematic deception, high-sounding phrases and popular slogans. “The opposite of what has been promised can always be done afterwards… That is of no consequence.” [Public health, global warming]
  18. A Reign of Terror is the most economical way to bring about speedy subjection. [Communist revolution in Russia in 1917, Zionism in Palestine since 1948]
  19.Masquerade as political, financial and economic advisers tocarry out our mandates with Diplomacy and without fear of exposing “the secret power behind national and international affairs.” [WEF, AIPAC]
  20. Ultimate world government is the goal. It will be necessary to establish huge monopolies, so even the largest fortunes of the Goyim will depend on us to such an extent that they will go to the bottom together with the credit of their governments on the day after the great political smash. [Big Pharma, Big Tech]
  21. Use economic warfare. Rob the landed properties and industries from the “Goyim” with a combination of high taxes and unfair competition. [Estate tax UK]
  22. “Make the ‘Goyim’ destroy each other so there will only be the proletariat left in the world, with a few millionaires devoted to our cause, and sufficient police and soldiers to protect our interest.” [Ukraine, Iran, now US and UK]
  23. Call it The New Order. Appoint a Dictator. [Bilderberg ‘New World Order‘]
  24. Fool, bemuse and corrupt the younger members of society by teaching them theories and principles we know to be false. [on screens, ‘DEI’ in education]
  25 Twist national and international laws into a contradiction which first masks the law and afterwards hides it altogether. Substitute arbitration for law. [UN and ICJ sanctioned by the US, deal outside international frameworks]

Of note, there is very limited information about the above secret agreement and plan of action (as could be expected). Corroboration is limited to anecdotal evidence and non-specific commentary. The above attribution of the source of the protocols to Mayer Rothschild in 1773 is in contrast with that described in the book by Nilus in 1905, or its translation by Victor E. Marsden in 1922, albeit not exclusively. The latter was reportedly imprisoned during the Russian revolution at the time Captain Cromie, the naval attaché at the British Embassy in Petrograd, Russia, met his death while defending the British embassy premises on 31 August, 1918. The substance of the protocols is, however, similar enough to suggest a common history, or a shared plan of action. Please refer ‘The Protocols of Zion‘ for more detail.

Of the 24 or 25 Protocols themselves, little need be said in the way of introduction. The book in which they are embodied was published by Sergyei Nilus in Russia in 1905. A copy of this is in the British Museum bearing the date of its reception August 10, 1906. All copies that were known to exist in Russia were destroyed in the Kerensky regime, and under his successors the possession of a copy by anyone in “Sovietland” was crime sufficient to ensure the owner’s being shot on sight. This fact appears in itself sufficient proof of the genuineness of the Protocols. The Jewish journals, of course, say that they are a forgery, leaving it to be understood that Professor Nilus, who embodied them in a work of his own, had concocted them for his own purposes.¹³

Mr. Henry Ford, in an interview published in the New York World, February 17, 1921, put the case for Nilus tersely and convincingly thus:

“The only statement I care to make about the PROTOCOLS is that they fit in with what is going on. They are sixteen years old, and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. THEY FIT IT NOW.“

Indeed they do! [and they still do today, as per the above possible [examples] in brackets after each numbered item]

According to the cult protocols as reported by Victor E. Marsden (1922):¹⁴

“We have set one against another the personal and national reckonings of the peoples, religious and race hatreds, which we have fostered into a huge growth in the course of the past twenty centuries. This is the reason why there is not one State which would anywhere receive support if it were to raise its arm, for every one of them must bear in mind that any agreement against us would be unprofitable to itself. We are too strong, there is no evading our power. The nations cannot come to even an inconsiderable private agreement without our secretly having a hand in it …“

“In order to put public opinion into our hands we must bring it into a state of bewilderment by giving expression from all sides to so many contradictory opinions and for such length of time as will suffice to make the peoples lose their heads in the labyrinth and come to see that the best thing is to have no opinion of any kind in matters political, which it is not given to the public to understand, because they are understood only by him who guides the public.” This is the first secret.”

“The second secret requisite for our success is comprised in the following: “to multiply to such an extent national failings, habits, passions, conditions of civil life, that it will be impossible for anyone to know where he is in the resulting chaos, so that the people in consequence will fail to understand one another … By all these means we shall so wear down the peoples that they will be compelled to offer us international power of a nature that by its possession will enable us without any violence gradually to absorb all the State forces of the world and to form a Super-Government.” [these statements, part of so-called ‘protocols’, reflect the 24 / 25 point plan above]

More recently [in November 2002], the “protocols” have drawn more attention as discussed in The Elders Of Zion And The Masters Of Discourse [C3].

The troublesome concept of the Hidden Hand or the Elders of Zion is superfluous and unnecessary, argues the author, Israel Shamir. “Arabs have no need to import anti-Semitic arguments from the old and far-away sources, provided they have a fresh round-the-clock local source: actual behaviour of the Jewish state and its Jewish citizens. It is much more convincing than old tales.” However, the Protocols are still with us and still entertain minds. The Protocols of the Elders of Zion are best described as ‘pseudo-epigraph’, rather than ‘fake’. They belong to the same category as Tomas Friedman’s Letter of President Clinton to Mubarak. After all, pseudo-epigraphic genre is an old and venerable one. It is even better to consider the Protocols, ‘a political pamphlet’. Its real author remains unknown, and it is difficult to imagine this person, for the Protocols are a literary palimpsest.

The Anonymous author of the Protocols describes a master-plan for vast restructuring of society, creation of a new oligarchy and subjugation of millions. [the] way to subjugation leads through Machiavellian manipulations and mind control a la Orwell’s 1984. (Orwell’s homage to the Protocols is even more striking as it is rarely noticed). The difficulty of the Protocols is in an uncanny dissonance between its uncouth language and deep social and religious thought. It is a rude parody-like rendering of a satanic, subtle and well-thought out plan, wrote the Nobel Prise winning novelist Alexander Solzhenitsyn^[5] in his (written in 1966 and published in 2001) analysis of the Protocols.

“The Protocols … show a blueprint of a social system. Its design is well above abilities of an ordinary mind, including that of its publisher. It is a dynamic process of two stages, of destabilization, increasing freedom and liberalism, which is terminated in social cataclysm, and on the second stage, new hierarchical restructuring of society takes place. It is more complicated than a nuclear bomb. It could be a stolen and distorted plan designed by a mind of genius. Its putrid style of an anti-Semitic grubby brochure [intentionally] obscures the great strength of thought and insight”.

Solzhenitsyn is aware of faults of the Protocols. “Its style is that of a filthy leaflet, the powerful line of thought is broken and fragmented, mixed up with ill-smelling incantations and psychological blunders. The system described is not necessarily connected with the Jews; it could be purely Masonic or whatever; while its strongly anti-Semitic current is not an organic part of the design”. Solzhenitsyn makes a textual experiment, removes words “Jews”, “Goyim” and “conspiracy” and finds many disturbing ideas. He concludes: “The text demonstrates impressive foresight on the two systems of society, the Western and the Soviet one. While a strong thinker could possibly predict the development of the West in 1901, how could he grasp the Soviet future?”

Concentration of capital in the hands of financiers, concentration of media in few hands, extra-judicial killings of unyielding leaders, stock market with its derivatives sucks out wealth and it accumulates in the hands of the priesthood of Mammon, gain (or “market forces”) as the only measure of successful strategy… Yes, the interest to the Protocols does not disappear because the described plan of creating oligarchic (not necessarily Jewish) rule is being implemented in real time and it is called the New World Order.

The Protocols identify the moving force of the New World Order with a powerful group of extremely chauvinist, manipulative and domination-obsessed Jewish leaders. The leaders, according to the Protocols, despise ordinary community members; they utilise and support anti-Semitism as the means to keep their “lesser brethren”, innocent ordinary folk of Jewish origin, in thrall to their rule. The leaders are described as pathological goy haters, bent on destroying culture and traditions of other nations while preserving their own. Their goal is to create world government and rule the homogenised and globalised world. David Ben Gurion, the first ruler of the Jewish state, coined an equally arrogant maxim: “Who cares what Goyim say? What matters is what the Jews do!” This sentence is an almost direct quote from the Protocols.

The late Israeli scholar Israel Shahak and an American Jewish writer Norton Mezvinsky present in their Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel a plethora of sayings by Jewish Rabbis that wouldn’t be out of place in the Protocols. “The difference between a Jewish soul and souls of non-Jews is greater and deeper than the difference between a human soul and the souls of cattle” (p. ix). Shahak and Mezvinsky proved the rage of the Jewish chauvinists does not differentiate between Palestinians, Arabs and Goyim in general. In other words, whatever happened to Palestinians could happen to any Gentile community standing on the way of the Jews.

Indeed, if the Protocols would have no relation to reality, they probably wouldn’t be as popular as they are. The Jews are sufficiently powerful to dream of domination, and some do. Apparently some Jewish ideas found their way into the text. Other thoughts are ascribed to the Jews on the basis of “qui bono”. In Palestine, the Jews have no compassion for the natives. They travel by segregated roads, study in segregated schools, while a Jew consumes ten times more water resources than a goy, and has seven times higher income. [in 2002] Thus, the Jewish separateness remains a fact of life for many Jewish communities. For their own well-being the Jews have to obscure their unique position, wealth and power by the following means:

• Holocaust discourse helps to fight envy.
• In a mono-ethnic society, the Jews as the only foreign body do stick out and attract attention, while in multicultural society they are hardly seen. For this purpose, the Jews support immigration from non-European countries, as their presence would remove the stamp of Jewish exclusiveness.
• The Political Correctness is another device forbidding the discussion of Jewish influence.
• Fight against Christianity and the Church makes sense for a non-Christian community: if the Church would be strong, the Christians would prefer their own, Christian elite.
• Globalisation is a natural development for the people spread all over the globe, if they attach but little importance to the local ways.
• Impoverishment of the natives is but another side of growing wealth of the Jewish community.

Summing it up, a big share (though not all) of the ideas ascribed to the Jews by the Protocols are indeed the ideas useful or necessary for the Jewish communal well-being, without any need for great hatred towards Gentiles and/or the guidance of mythic Elders of Zion. That is the reason of the Protocols’ long life. Paradoxically, without Israeli apartheid these facts would remain invisible for the host communities. [thus the protocols, regardless of legitimacy, provide a clear window to events]

The Dark Forces in Control of the Anglo-American-Zionist Empire Are the Source of the World Crisis [B3]

“Starting around 1835, the Rothschilds began to infiltrate the U.S. under their agent August Belmont (neé Aaron Schönberg), with the Morgans and the Rockefellers setting up the infamous “Money Trust” as U.S. partners. The Rothschild dynasty is also closely connected to the British Royal Family. The British “Royals” are their sponsors and puppets, enjoying incredible wealth as a still-ongoing payoff for the bankers’ veneer of legitimacy.

The City of London financial center, where 80 percent of the world’s money laundering comes from, is a private sphere with its own laws and regulations and it is under the control of the Rothschild family. The Jewish banking capital city played a significant role in Lord Palmerston’s proposing the idea of Israel in the mid-1800s. Britain created “Chatham House” as a permanent lobbying institution for endless imperial war, which was matched in the U.S. by the Morgan-Rockefeller-funded Council on Foreign Relations. The CFR continues to advocate for global imperial dominance to this day. Its house organ is Foreign Affairs magazine.”

Also refer The Tip of the Iceberg: Israel. The Historical Role of The Rothschilds [C3]

E.C. Knuth writes, in “The Empire of the City”:

“The fact that the House of Rothschild made its money in the great crashes of history and the great wars of history, the very periods when others lost their money, is beyond question.” The Great Soviet Encyclopedia states, “The clearest example of a personal linkup (international directorates) on a Western European scale is the Rothschild family. The London and Paris branches of the Rothschilds are bound not just by family ties but also by personal link-ups in jointly controlled companies.” The encyclopedia further described these companies as international monopolies.

The Rothschild family has indeed played a crucial role in international finance for two centuries, as Frederick Morton, in “The Rothschilds” writes:

“For the last one hundred and fifty years the history of the House of Rothschild has been to an amazing extent the backstage history of Western Europe.” (Preface)… Because of their success in making loans not to individuals, but to nations, they reaped huge profits, although as Morton writes: “Someone once said that the wealth of Rothschild consists of the bankruptcy of nations.” (p36)

The Fed

… (the cult’s) privilege of creating currency or “money” was cemented in the United States in 1913 when then U.S. President Woodrow Wilson signed legislation (prepared by international bankers such as the Warburgs) which transferred the power of doing so into their hands in what became known as the Federal Reserve Act (1913). This was a major coup for the international bankers (the cult).¹⁵ The government had been under the false impression that the right of government to issue money was not being surrendered. The establishment of the Federal Reserve (hereinafter ‘the FED’) had been sold to government on the basis that government would retain control of the process, but in reality, they did not. The act had been hurriedly signed [on 23 December] without proper scrutiny.¹⁶ [Personal Income Tax – to pay the consequent debt owed to the Fed – was introduced at the same time]

According to author E.H. Brown:

“The bill was so obscurely worded that no one really understood its provisions… but while the national money supply would be printed by the U.S. Bureau of Engraving and Printing, it would be issued as an obligation or debt of the government, a debt owed back to the private Federal Reserve with interest. Today the debate over who should create the money supply is rarely heard. Few people even know it is an issue. The puppeteers [cult associates] working the money machine were more visible in the 1890s than today, largely because they had not yet bought up the media and cornered public opinion.”¹⁷

The Federal Reserve Cartel: The Eight Families [B2]

“80% ownership of the New York Federal Reserve Bank- by far the most powerful Fed branch- by just eight families, four of which reside in the US. They are the Goldman Sachs, Rockefellers, Lehmans and Kuhn Loebs of New York; the Rothschilds of Paris and London; the Warburgs of Hamburg; the Lazards of Paris; and the Israel Moses Seifs of Rome.”

One founder (then official) of the Federal Reserve, and the head of its equivalent the German Bundesbank, in 1913 and during WW1, were Warburgs. Brothers.

World War and the Bolshevik Revolution

Is a World War About to Start or Has It Already? [B2]

The immediate purpose of the Federal Reserve [in 1913] was to provide Great Britain and France with the money to fight Germany in WWI. The Federal Reserve was, above all, central to an Anglo-American objective to take over the world. The purpose of this takeover was to expand the grip over the world economy of the empire of usury. It was through usury, which had been prohibited in Europe up to the Middle Ages and by the Islamic religion since its founding, that the world’s bankers have confiscated the wealth of every nation in which they have been allowed to dominate. Usury requires the constant generation of surplus profits to feed the bankers’ greed. Military force is the means by which the proceeds of usury are secured. [one reason for the ‘forever wars’] For example, the efforts of revisionist historians such as Luigi Albertini, H. E. Barnes, and Sydney B. Fay shredded the notion of Germany’s singular guilt for the First World War and the unduly punitive Treaty of Versailles (which laid the groundwork for the Second World War).¹⁸

Theodor Herzl (1860–1904), the founder of modern Zionism, maintained that anti-Semitism is not an aberration, but a natural and completely understandable response by non-Jews to alien Jewish behavior and attitudes. The only solution, he argued, is for Jews to recognize reality and live in a separate state of their own. “The Jewish question exists wherever Jews live in noticeable numbers,” he wrote in his most influential work, ‘The Jewish State‘. “Where it does not exist, it is brought in by arriving Jews. … I believe I understand anti-Semitism, which is a very complex phenomenon. I consider this development as a Jew, without hate or fear.” The Jewish question, he maintained, is not social or religious. “It is a national question. To solve it we must, above all, make it an international political issue. …” Regardless of their citizenship, Herzl insisted, Jews constitute not merely a religious community, but a nationality, a people, a Volk.¹⁹ Zionism, wrote Herzl, offered the world a welcome “final solution of the Jewish question.”²⁰ [sound familiar?]

Dr. Chaim Weizmann was a Russian-born Israeli statesman, biochemist, and Zionist leader who served as president of the Zionist Organization and later as the first president of Israel. Weizmann was instrumental in obtaining the United Kingdom “Balfour Declaration” of 1917 to form the State of Israel, later convincing the United States government to recognize it in 1948. His account enables us to see the beginnings of all this; and how this narrative now reaches our own time, continuing to receive daily shape from what then occurred.²¹

He [Weizmann] explains that the Jews in Russia [and elsewhere]were divided into three groups. The first group was that of the Jews who, seeking “the peace of the city,” simply wanted to become peaceable Russian citizens, as the Jews of the West, in the majority, at that time were loyal German, French or other citizens. The remaining mass of Jews in Russia were divided into two groups by a vertical line which split households and families, including Dr. Weizmann’s own house and family. Both of these groups were revolutionary; which is to say, they agreed in working for the destruction of Russia as it was. The dissension was solely on the point of Zionism. The “Communist-revolutionary” group held that full “emancipation” would be achieved when the world-revolution supplanted the nation states everywhere. The “Zionist-revolutionary” group, while agreeing that the world-revolution was indispensable to the process, held that full “emancipation” would only be achieved when a Jewish nation was established in a Jewish state.²²

Before WW1, the cult was already fomenting Communism in Russia [and everywhere else], a revolutionary movement designed to subvert the masses; it was the “great popular movement” foreseen by Disraeli, by means of which “secret societies” [supported by the British] were to work in unison for the disruption of Europe.²³ (In Russia) neither force – communism or zionism – could have moved forward without the other, for rulers of unimpaired authority would have checked the revolution as it had been checked in 1848.

Communism, and, more generally, left-wing radicalism, was relatively widespread among Jews, especially in Eastern Europe. I refer to facts not myths. Most Jews who left the closed traditional communities tended to support political radicalism. If they did not choose Zionism, they supported the revolutionary left. Sometimes both. Secular Jewish culture was predominantly leftist. What is even more relevant, Jews were important in communist movements. They were prominent among revolutionary leaders, both before and after the seizure of power by the communists. Occasionally, other leaders praised Jews for this, as was the case with Engels and Lenin, for example.²⁴

The common source of inspiration of Zionism and Communism is shown by significant parallels that can be drawn between the two chief methods laid down in them and the chief methods pursued by Dr. Herzl and Karl Marx: laying emphasis on the incitement of “the mob” against the ruling class as the most effective means of destroying States and nations and achieving world dominion.

“The aristocracy of the peoples, as a political force, is dead … but as landed proprietors they can still be harmful to us from the fact that they are self-sufficing in the resources upon which they live. It is essential therefore for us at whatever cost to deprive them of their land … At the same time we must intensively patronize trade and industry … what we want is that industry should drain off from the land both labour and capital and by means of speculation transfer into our hands all the money of the world.”

[For example, global markets exceeded $1 quadrillion in 2023. The overall market size demonstrated +10% growth YoY by the end of 2023, driven by larger outstanding notional in IR derivatives and appreciation in cash equities. The scale of derivatives held by major banks like JPMorgan Chase, Citibank and Goldman Sachs, amounting to $203 trillion, has raised concerns about the potential risks these positions might pose to the global economy. The third-quarter ‘Quarterly Report on Bank Trading and Derivatives Activities‘, published by the Office of the Comptroller of Currency, provides a comprehensive dive into this issue. This figure surpasses the world’s gross domestic product (GDP) by roughly double, highlighting the enormity of the market. Derivatives are a ‘means of speculation‘]

This worldwide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the nineteenth century; and … the cult gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and became practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.²⁵ There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews.²⁶ At the time, the facts were available. The British Government’s White Paper of 1919 (Russia, No. 1, a Collection of Reports on Bolshevism) quoted the report sent to Mr. Balfour in London in 1918 by the Netherlands Minister at Saint Petersburg, M. Oudendyke:

“Bolshevism is organized and worked by Jews, who have no nationality and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things.”

The United States Ambassador, Mr. David R. Francis, reported similarly:

“The Bolshevik leaders here, most of whom are Jews and 90 percent of whom are returned exiles, care little for Russia or any other country but are internationalists and they are trying to start a worldwide social revolution.”

One witness preserved the official record. This was Mr. Robert Wilton, correspondent of the London Times, who experienced the Bolshevik revolution. The French edition of his book included the official Bolshevik lists of the membership of the ruling revolutionary bodies (they were omitted from the English edition). These records show that the Central Committee of the Bolshevik party, which wielded the supreme power, contained 3 Russians (including Lenin) and 9 Jews. The next body in importance, the Central Committee of the Executive Commission (or secret police) comprised 42 Jews and 19 Russians, Letts, Georgians and others. The Council of People’s Commissars consisted of 17 Jews and five others. The Moscow Cheka (secret police) was formed of 23 Jews and 13 others. Among the names of 566 high officials of the Bolshevik state officially published in 1918-1919, were 458 Jews and 108 others. Among the central committees of small, supposedly “Socialist” or other non-Communist parties (during that early period the semblance of “opposition” was permitted, to beguile the masses, accustomed under the Czar to opposition parties) were 55 Jews and 6 others. All the names are given in the original documents reproduced by Mr. Wilton.²⁷

In summary, members of the cult, heavily involved with Marxism, fomented the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia,²⁸ effectively running the Soviet Gulag and murdering millions of Christians before they came under attack themselves from Hitler when he invaded Russia.^{29 30} Simultaneously, a different type of revolution was brewing. The cult used their money to form the Zionist movement that began to infiltrate Anglo-American governance with the aim of creating the apartheid Zionist state in Palestine we know today.³¹ An underlying cause of World War I, World War II, the annihilation of Germany, and today’s slide into World War III was to create the state of Greater Israel as a world-dominating force. This is part of what lies behind the WEF, WHO, “Great Reset,” (etc.) strategies.³²

Many Jews and Jewish publications have confirmed the predominately Jewish nature of Communism and the Bolshevik Revolution.³³ For example, according to the Encyclopedia Judaica:³⁴

“The Communist movement and ideology played an important part in Jewish life, particularly in the 1920s, 1930s, and during and after World War II. […] Individual Jews played an important role in the early stages of Bolshevism and the Soviet regime. […] The great attraction of Communism among Russian, and later also Western, Jewry emerged only with the establishment of the Soviet regime in Russia. […] Communist trends became widespread in virtually all Jewish communities.”

Leon Trotsky’s book Stalin, written in exile, attempted to show that Stalin had played only an insignificant role in the early days of the Communist takeover. To illustrate his point, Trotsky reproduced a postcard depicting the six leaders of the revolution. These leaders were: 1) Vladimir Lenin (who was at least one-quarter Jewish, spoke Yiddish in his home, and was married to a Jewess); 2) Trotsky (real Jewish name: Lev Bronstein); Zinoviev (real Jewish name: Hirsch Apfelbaum); Lunacharsky (a Gentile); Kamenov (real Jewish name: Rosenfeld); and Sverdlov (Jewish). Thus, according to Trotsky, five of the six leaders of the Communist takeover of the Soviet Union were Jewish.³⁵ Israeli historian Louis Rapoport, in his book Stalin’s War Against the Jews, wrote:³⁶

“Immediately after the Revolution, many Jews were euphoric over their high representation in the new government. Lenin’s first Politburo was dominated by men of Jewish origins…Under Lenin, Jews became involved in all aspects of the Revolution, including its dirtiest work. Despite the Communists’ vows to eradicate anti-Semitism, it spread rapidly after the Revolution—partly because of the prominence of so many Jews in the Soviet administration, as well as in the traumatic, inhuman Sovietization drives that followed. Historian Salo Baron has noted that an immensely disproportionate number of Jews joined the new Bolshevik police, the Cheka, “perhaps in subconscious retaliation for the many years of suffering at the hands of the Russian police.” And many of those who fell afoul of the Cheka would be shot by Jewish investigators.”

Jewish historian Dr. Angelo Solomon Rappoport wrote: “The Jews in Russia, in their total mass, were responsible for the Revolution.”³⁷ A number of Jewish publications, such as The Jewish Chronicle, have also disclosed Vladimir Lenin’s Jewish heritage.³⁸ The Jewish magazine ‘The American Hebrew‘ in 1920 stated that the Bolshevik revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish brains and planning. It wrote:³⁹

“The Bolshevik movement is neither polite nor tolerant; in its initial phase it was purely destructive…What Jewish idealism and Jewish discontent have so powerfully contributed to accomplish in Russia, the same historic qualities of the Jewish mind and heart are tending to promote in other countries.”

The predominately Jewish nature of the Bolshevik Revolution was confirmed by the Jew, M. Cohen, on April 12, 1919 in The Communist Charkov. Cohen stated:⁴⁰

“Without exaggeration, it may be said that the great Russian Revolution was indeed accomplished by the hands of the Jews.”

Lenin, in his “Collected Works“, wrote:

“The World War” (1914-1918) “will see the establishment of Communism in Russia; a second world war will extend its control over Europe; and a third world war will be necessary to make it worldwide“.⁴¹

The Secret Society That Rules The World [F2]

Following World War I, a synergy of Anglo-American wealth and power culminated in the establishment of the Royal Institute of International Affairs, commonly referred to as the Chatham House, on the British island, and its sister organisation, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), in the US – the combination of which represented the reincarnation of the hidden Anglo-American establishment in the post-war era. The Council on Foreign Relations is of course not the sole occupant of the establishment’s outer circle. [e.g. The Bilderberg Conference has been bringing elitists from Europe and North America together every year in near total secret since it was founded in 1954.]⁴²

Prelude to World War 2

Captain Ramsay, WWI veteran, former member of His Majesty’s Scottish Guard, and finally a Member of Parliament, was arrested and imprisoned for nearly three years under an Orwellian law in England, without formal charges or a trial, because he had discovered and was attempting to expose the orchestrators of WWII. In this book he gives us details of the British, French, Russian and … Spanish Revolutions, proving that the same ‘unseen hand’ was behind … all of the unrest and bloodshed throughout the centuries, in lockstep with their ‘Plan for World Dominion’. When he began naming the perpetrators, that was it: off to prison went this Member of Parliament.

When the war ended, he was released from Brixton Prison and allowed to return to his seat in Parliament as though nothing had happened.⁴³ He was however relentlessly denigrated as a traitor to his country and an antisemite. He was definitely an anti-communist, which he – accurately at the time – defined as controlled by ‘Jewish power’.⁴⁴ Many people who were against the war were locked up and/or denigrated in the lead up to WW2, including also Charles Lindbergh in the US.^{45 46} All were accused of ‘antisemitism’. [Shades of the criminalisation of holocaust denial and the anti-genocide movements active today. Where there is smoke …] The truth is that many Jewish people are not descended from semites, and many Jewish people are very opposed to the Zionists committing atrocities in their name.⁴⁷

Reverted History: How an International Jewish Plot Gave Us WW2 [F3]

Here’s what really happened: international Jewish financiers, who long had controlled much of the wealth of Europe saw Germany’s revolutionary new economic system as a threat to their globally growing power. So, they used their powerful influence over the Great Powers at the time – namely Great Britain, the Soviet Union, and the United States – to crush it, along with all its allies. They were in a rush to do this before the world took notice that Germany’s new system would not only yank these financiers out of their long-held power positions in international finance and media, but deprive them of the ultimate source of their economic power – usury (and the charging of interest on loans) – which was abolished by National Socialism (and helped transform pre-war Germany into an economic powerhouse).

For Germany, as it was in several European nations at the time, communist revolution was the greatest threat to the social order – and communism was clearly well-known to be a Jewish movement. For them to react in a radically self-defensive manner after learning about, and in some cases personally witnessing, widespread torture, starvation, and genocide of white Europeans by a Jewish ideological movement [in Russia] is, at the very least, understandable. [Unsurprisingly]

Also refer The Iron Curtain Over America (1951) [F3]

In 1943 — during which year he was also detailed to the General Staff Corps and promoted to lieutenant colonel — the author (John Beatty) was made Chief of the Interview Section. In the next three years he interviewed more than two thousand persons, most of whom were returning from some high mission, some delicate assignment, or some deed of valor — often in a little-known region of the world. Those interviewed included military personnel in rank from private first class to four stars, diplomatic officials from vice-consuls to ambassadors and special representatives of the President, senators and congressmen returning from overseas investigations, missionaries, explorers, businessmen, refugees, and journalists — among the latter, Raymond Clapper and Ernie Pyle, who were interviewed between their next to the last and their last and fatal voyages. These significant people were presented sometimes individually but usually to assembled groups of officers and other experts from the various branches of G-2, from other General Staff divisions, from each of the technical services, and from other components interested in vital information which could be had by interview perhaps six weeks before being received in channeled reports. In some cases the author increased his knowledge of a given area or topic by consulting documents suggested during an interview. Thus, from those he interviewed, from those specialists for whom he arranged the interviews, and from study in which he had expert guidance, he had a unique opportunity for learning the history, resources, ideologies, capabilities, and intentions of the great foreign powers. In its most essential aspects, the picture was terrifyingly different from the picture presented by our government to the American people!

The first (small) Zionist groups in Palestine (now the ruling Likud party) sought to ally themselves with the Nazis in Germany and Mussolini in Italy in the 1930s, and in fact were one of few foreign bodies that traded with Germany prior to WW2 breaking out. Zionists were in fact the only other political organisation allowed to exist in Germany at the time.⁴⁸ [This relates to “The dissension was solely on the point of Zionism” as expressed by Dr. Chaim Weizmann above] Indeed, six months after Hitler came to power, the ‘Zionist Federation‘ of Germany (by far the largest Zionist group in the country) submitted a detailed memorandum to the new government that reviewed German-Jewish relations and formally offered Zionist support in “solving” the vexing “Jewish question.”⁴⁹ The Federation’s paper, the Jüdische Rundschau (“Jewish Review”), proclaimed the same message:

“Zionism recognizes the existence of a Jewish problem and desires a far-reaching and constructive solution. For this purpose Zionism wishes to obtain the assistance of all peoples, whether pro- or anti-Jewish, because, in its view, we are dealing here with a concrete rather than a sentimental problem, the solution of which all peoples are interested.”⁵⁰

On this basis of their similar ideologies about ethnicity and nationhood, National Socialists and Zionists worked together for what each group believed was in its own national interest. An agreement, also known as the Ha’avara (Hebrew for “transfer”), was concluded in August 1933 following talks between German officials and Chaim Arlosoroff, Political Secretary of the Jewish Agency, the Palestine center of the ‘World Zionist Organization‘.⁵¹ Through this unusual arrangement, each Jew bound for Palestine deposited money in a special account in Germany. The money was used to purchase German-made agricultural tools, building materials, pumps, fertilizer, and so forth, which were exported to Palestine and sold there by the Jewish-owned Ha’avara company in Tel-Aviv. Money from the sales was given to the Jewish emigrant upon his arrival in Palestine in an amount corresponding to his deposit in Germany. The Ha’avara thus served the Zionist aim of bringing Jewish settlers and development capital to Palestine, while simultaneously serving the German goal of freeing the country of an unwanted alien group.

Delegates at the 1933 Zionist Congress in Prague vigorously debated the merits of the Agreement. Some feared that the pact would undermine the international Jewish ‘war’ (economic boycott) against Germany. But Zionist officials reassured the Congress. The 1935 Zionist Congress in Switzerland overwhelmingly endorsed the pact. In 1936 the Jewish Agency (the Zionist “shadow government” in Palestine) took over direct control of the Ha’avara, which remained in effect until the Second World War forced its abandonment.

The Hitler government vigorously supported Zionism and Jewish emigration to Palestine from 1933 until 1940–1941, when the Second World War prevented extensive collaboration.⁵²

Until late 1938, the Zionist movement flourished in Germany under Hitler. The circulation of the Zionist Federation’s bi-weekly Jüdische Rundschau grew enormously. Numerous Zionist books were published. “Zionist work was in full swing” in Germany during those years, The Encyclopaedia Judaica notes. A Zionist convention held in Berlin in 1936 reflected “in its composition the vigorous party life of German Zionists.”⁵³ Jewish people with a Palestine ‘passport’ were deemed Zionist and allowed to emigrate. In early January 1941 a small but important Zionist organization submitted a formal proposal to German diplomats in Beirut for a military-political alliance with wartime Germany. The offer was made by the radical underground “Fighters for the Freedom of Israel,” better known as the Lehi or Stern Gang. Its leader, Avraham Stern, had recently broken with the radical nationalist “National Military Organization” (Irgun Zvai Leumi) over the group’s attitude toward Britain, which had effectively banned further Jewish settlement of Palestine. Stern regarded Britain as the main enemy of Zionism.

Remarkably, Stern’s group sought to conclude a pact with the Third Reich at a time when stories that Hitler was bent on exterminating Jews were already in wide circulation. Stern apparently either did not believe the stories or he was willing to collaborate with the mortal enemy of his people to help bring about a Jewish state.⁵⁴ An important Lehi member at the time the group made this offer was Yitzhak Shamir, who later served as Israel’s Foreign Minister and then, during much of the 1980s and until June 1992, as Prime Minister. As Lehi operations chief following Stern’s death in 1942, Shamir organized numerous acts of terror, including the November 1944 assassination of British Middle East Minister Lord Moyne and the September 1948 slaying of Swedish United Nations mediator Count Bernadotte.⁵⁵ Speaking of terrorists, it must be remembered that the IDF was created by the gathering of the Hagahna [Ben Gurion], the Irgun (Menahem Begin), and the Lehi (Yitzhak Shamir). Years later, when Shamir was asked about the 1941 offer, he confirmed that he was aware of the proposed Lehi alliance with wartime Germany.

Also refer Netanyahu and Nazism [B3]

It is shocking to consider that a Jew could be a Nazi. Yet a few rare exceptions were, and received the title of “Honorary Aryan” from the Führer. Vladimir Jabotinsky, the leader of the “Revisionist Zionists,” did not receive it, but he shared with the Nazis their racial conception of nationalism. He advocated the founding of a “Jewish Empire” alongside the Third Reich and received support from the Nazi Party. One of his disciples negotiated with Adolf Eichmann the extermination of 450,000 Hungarian Jews in exchange for the emigration of a thousand “Revisionist Zionists.” They shared the spoils of their crime. Last month, Benjamin Netanyahu, just before being accused of genocide by the United Nations, claimed to be not a “Zionist,” but a “revisionist Zionist.” On August 23, 2025, Benjamin Netanyahu declared on i24News that his “historic and spiritual mission” was to realize a Greater Israel from the Nile to the Euphrates. He is [thus] the only head of government in the world to thus announce his intention to annex his neighbors. Will he succeed?

The explicit goal of the October 7 attacks was the creation of a Palestinian state. So, if we consider the flurry of activity at the United Nations this week, (Note Canada, the UK, Portugal, France, Australia, Belgium etc have all joined the “recognizers”. As of September 23, 2025, the State of Palestine is recognized by 156 out of 193 UN member states, representing about 80% of UN membership) we must conclude that –on a political level– Hamas is prevailing in its war with Israel. … are many of these countries simply acknowledging that Hamas is not a terrorist organization at all but a national liberation movement that is justified in defending its land from foreign occupation? (According to Grok– As of September 23, 2025, only 10 countries have designated Hamas as a terrorist organization. The designation is basically a hoax to propagandize western populations).⁵⁶

This time, the Holocaust isn’t the only historic injustice on the world’s mind as it seeks to advance a solution to the conflict. And just as the Holocaust gave birth to the state of Israel, this genocide will give birth to the Palestinian state. The violence Israel is employing in Gaza has rebounded on it like a diplomatic boomerang…. Bibi thought he had besieged the Gaza Strip, but it turns out that [Hamas leader] Sinwar was the architect of a diplomatic siege on Israel. In Its Vengeful War in Gaza, Israel Played the Tragic Role Hamas Had Scripted, Haaretz. The question now is whether Hamas can transform this political victory into a distinct geographical entity with its own borders, independent governing body, and sovereign control over its own territory.

Thoughts on the Holocaust

It is difficult to get a clear picture of the “alleged” holocaust. There has been much written on it [there are encyclopedias on the subject], but given the act of “holocaust denial” is now a criminal act in many countries, and that numerous lives have been destroyed for proffering alternate views, there does not seem to be much room for judicious debate. [Protocol 1: The use of violence and terrorism rather than academic discussions… “He reasoned it was logical to conclude that By the laws of nature right lies in force.“] Why is it important? The holocaust narrative directly relates to current geopolitical events (wars) in the Middle East as a whole, and underpins the push for online censorship and crackdown on “antisemitism”.

One example of a robust written debate on the issue is linked here. Other material can be found linked here. I personally found the following three articles published in the Unz Review quite persuasive: well referenced and thought provoking: [noting that the UNZ Review also has many authors that are ‘controversial’ to say the least]

• https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-israel-and-the-holocaust-hoax [B2]
• https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-gaza-jewish-power-and-the-holocaust [B2]
• https://www.unz.com/proberts/the-demise-of-western-law-dates-from-the-nuremberg-trials [C3]

Also refer The Holocaust of Six Million Jews—in World War I [C3]

I find much of what is published in the legacy media, or, more importantly, what is deliberately left out, to serve only promoted narratives. I prefer the raw data so I can decide for myself and form my own views. I endorse what Ron Unz has to say on the matter.

“This is not to say that I personally agree with all or even most of what these writers believe or claim. However, sometimes the most valuable insights are obtained by reading opinions sharply divergent from one’s own. Facing a sharp intellectual or ideological challenge forces us to more effectively frame our arguments and buttress the weaknesses in our logic and evidence that had previously remained unnoticed. Taking the measure of an effective critic is always more valuable than listening to a mindless echo. And I would always prefer reading something disturbing than something dull.” By Ron Unz, Editor-in-Chief of the Unz Review at https://www.unz.com/ .

For example, Auschwitz: Six Facts, and Seven Questions [F3]

The … report casts doubt on one of the most famous events ever promulgated by the media and historians after the second world war – the killing of six million jews in gas chambers. If true, this became the most successful propaganda campaign in history. The story that the “Final Solution” was extermination gained substantial publicity from a document presented at Nuremburg, (Document 710-PS). Originally issued by Göring to Heydrich, this is what it said. Berlin, 31.7.1941:

“In addition to the task already assigned to them by decree of 24.1.39, the Jewish question in the form of emigration or evacuation in accordance with the most favorable solution possible, I hereby entrust you with all necessary preparations from an organizational, factual and material point of view to meeting for an overall solution of the Jewish question in the German sphere of influence in Europe.”

“That no one has ever found a written order for the physical extermination of the Jews originating with Adolf Hitler or any other leading National Socialist politician is agreed upon by historians of all orientations.” Jürgen Graf.

“If everyone who claims to be a survivor at Auschwitz really is one, then whom did Hitler kill?” Norman Finkelstein’s (Jewish) mother.

Further, Walter Sanning in his book ‘Dissolution of Eastern European Jewry’, from ‘The International History Review‘, August, 1985, which contains 24 tables, 453 references and footnotes quoting 98 publications and authors (almost entirely Allied, Zionist, and other “sympathetic” sources), with 205 pages of text, arrived at a figure of slightly under 3 million Jews who in 1941, just before the Holocaust is said to have started, lived in areas of Europe that were or later came for a short time under the German sphere of influence. … By 1965, the Bonn government had … received 3,375,000 applications from Jewish “survivors” for Holocaust reparations. By 2009, this figure had reached 5,360,710.

As Faurisson emphasized, during the years 1948-1959, Eisenhower, Churchill, and de Gaulle published their memoirs and histories, which totaled more than 7,000 pages. These individuals were the greatest victorious “heroes” of World War II and the massive works they had published were intended to permanently establish their places in history, not merely for the next few years, but for many decades and even centuries to come. Mainstream Holocaust scholars have reasonably argued that the event they study was probably the greatest crime ever committed in the history of the world, the rapid extermination of six million innocent victims by one of the world’s most highly-educated countries using diabolically advanced scientific means. Those three leaders had led the global campaign to defeat the country responsible for the Holocaust, which had only occurred about a decade earlier. Yet no one reading those 7,000 pages of text would have ever suspected that any Holocaust had even occurred. How can that possibly be explained under the standard historical narrative?

There is however no doubt however that numerous military POW, as well as civilians, including many of Jewish origin, were injured, killed or died of hunger or disease. Same as in Japanese camps. But not six million.

That magic number, which had a long history of Jews at alleged risk of this or that threat, was frequently reported in the [cult] controlled press such as the New York Times. It first appeared there in 1867 and was repeated 34 further times up to 1939. In all some 106 citations were identified (by Kollerstrom) before 1942. So the final alleged figure of ‘six million’ for Jewish losses as a result of National Socialist persecution was firmly set before the war. [There are two mentions in a voluminous 1948 Red Cross document (736 pages) of “death camps” (one in September 1940) and one each of “gas chamber” and “crematorium” (not linked to specific deaths).] Through a long series of incredible, unbelievable circumstances, six million Jews were perpetually suffering through various incarnations of a “holocaust” for decades prior to World War II. Such references tapered off through the 1930s, but accelerated again with the approach of the second great war. Several mentions of the “six million” appeared between 1936 and 1939. With the onset of war in September 1939, the predictions became explicit. In June of 1940, leading Zionist Nahum Goldmann was quoted as saying “Six million Jews in Europe are doomed to destruction, if the victory of the Nazis should be final.”⁵⁷

Of note, millions of Germans died in the five years AFTER 1945 from starvation and ethnic cleansing, with estimates ranging from nine up to 37 million people. Meticulous Canadian historian James Bacque presented detailed statistics, and summarized: “More than nine million Germans died as a result of Allied starvation and expulsion policies in the first five years after WW2 – a total far in excess of the figures actually reported. That these deaths occurred at all is still being concealed and denied, especially by Western governments” [Source: “Crimes and Mercies“, James Bacque, 2nd edition (2003), Introduction, page 3 of PDF]. This is supported by:

1. James Bacque – Crimes and Mercies (1997, 2003): Main focus: 9-10 million German Civilians starved to death under the Morgenthau Plan, JCS1067, in 1945-50
2. James Bacque – Other Losses (1989): Main focus: 1.5 million German POW-Civilians genocided by the USA and France
3. Thomas Goodrich – Hellstorm (2010): Main focus: 3.81 million Ethnic-German Civilians genocided during WW2 (e.g. in Dresdenin Feb 1945)
4. Erich Maschke – “Zur Geschichte der deutschen Kriegsgefangenen des Zweiten Weltkrieges” (On the History of the German POWs of WW2) (1965, 1973): Main focus: 1.1 million Ethnic-German POW-Civilians genocided by communist Russia
5. Konrad Adenauer (later Chancellor), March 1949 speech in Bern : Main focus: 7 million German Refugees who perished while fleeing Ethnic Cleansing in the East
6. Foreign-minister Willy Brandt (later Chancellor), 1969 speech to German parliament: Focus: 1.5 million German POW-Civilians genocided by the USA and France

The chief result of the First World War was to establish revolutionary-Zionism and revolutionary-Communism as new forces in international affairs, the first with a promised “homeland” and the second with a resident State. The chief result of the Second World War was that “territorial gains” accrued to, and only to, Zionism and Communism; Zionism received its resident State and Communism received half of Europe. [with thanks to the US administration and its ‘Lend-Lease’ Act]⁵⁸

“If the nations embroiled in wars are denied “territorial gains, the only victors will then be our international agentur … our international rights will then wipe out national rights, in the proper sense of right, and will rule the nations precisely as the civil law of States rules the relations of their subjects among themselves.” ⁵⁹

To bring about this state of affairs compliant politicians are needed, and of them is said:

“The administrators whom we shall choose from among the public (and following “fair” elections), with strict regard to their capacities for servile obedience, will not be persons trained in the arts of government, and will therefore easily become pawns in our game, in the hands of men of learning and genius who will be their advisers, specialists bred and reared from early childhood to rule the affairs of the whole world.” [as stated in the 25 point Rothschild plan of action as above]

You can judge for yourself whether this description fits some of “the administrators” of the West in the last five decades; the test is their attitude and support given towards zionism, and the world-revolution and world-government (now Globalism) that support it.

[cult activities in themselves provide significant overlap between zionism, neocolonialism, imperialism and communism.^{60 61} Even Nazism.⁶²]

The founding of the State of Israel in 1948

The Rothschild dynasty, the bankers who financed wars in Europe for nearly 500 years, later spearheaded the establishment of Israel. In an interview before his death, the elder Jacob Rothschild openly stated, “Our family founded Israel.”

War Profiteers and Israel’s Bank [F2]

Israel’s Prime Minister is not the final authority in the Zionist project. Politicians come and go. The final authority is at the head of an immensely huge pool of capital. The specialists in pools of capital are banks. It’s well-known which bank is behind the Zionist project. That is the Rothschild bank. Jacob Rothschild re-acknowledged this responsibility in 2017, on the 100th anniversary of the “Balfour Declaration”, which was in a letter to his uncle Walter Rothschild. Jacob Rothschild stated that Israel was funded specifically for “that sacred goal, the return of Israel to its ancestral homeland”.

Israel’s very survival during its founding (also) depended critically on external military support, primarily from an unexpected source: the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union initially backed Israel in 1948 by supporting its founding in the UN and facilitating arms deals between its satellite state Czechoslovakia and Israel. These arms transfers proved decisive in the War of Independence. As David Ben-Gurion later acknowledged, “They saved the country, I have no doubt of that… The Czech arms deal was the greatest help, it saved us and without it I very much doubt if we could have survived the first month.” [given Stalin’s antisemitism, this appears to be similar to Hitler’s support for Zionism as a means of encouraging jews to move to Israel. Many jews were also “encouraged’ to move to Israel from Egypt, Yemen and other countries, allegedly by Israeli false flag operations]

Perhaps most remarkably, Israel’s early survival further depended on support from Jewish-American organized crime networks. Meyer Lansky, more notoriously known as “the Mob’s Accountant,” donated a million dollars to the Zionist cause in 1948, a contribution that proved crucial during Israel’s War of Independence. Lansky, an Ashkenazi Jew born in present-day Belarus, immigrated to Manhattan in 1911. He later used his extensive criminal network to aid the Jewish state, obstructing arms shipments to Arab countries and assisting Jewish settlers. Lansky’s operations extended beyond just financial donations. He controlled major U.S. ports through his connections with the Italian Mafia and the International Longshoremen’s Association, enabling him to manipulate cargo shipments. Workers and customs officials who feared Lansky’s reputation helped ensure key weapons shipments reached Israel safely while Arab-bound arms mysteriously “fell” from cranes into harbors or were “mistakenly loaded” onto ships sailing to remote destinations, according to a report by JFeed.⁶³

The JFK assassination

Lansky is also linked to JFK’s assassination via (his) gang member Jack Ruby, who confessed to his Rabbi that he (in killing Oswald) “did it for the Jews”.

“Most Americans, learning that Jack Ruby was a mobster, must have thought he was Italian, like Hollywood gangsters. They were not told that his real name was Jacob Leon Rubenstein, that he was the son of Jewish Polish immigrants,⁶⁴ that he went to the synagogue just before shooting Oswald, and that he later confessed to his rabbi that he “did it for the Jews.” Jacob Rubenstein belonged to the Jewish mafia, also known as the Yiddish Connection. He had moved from Chicago to Dallas in 1947, on the trail of 15 other Chicago mobsters (including 3 Italians and 9 Jews) who had settled there to take over the prostitution business. That is when he changed his name from Rubenstein to Ruby. Ruby’s mentor and role model was Mickey Cohen, who operated in Chicago during the Prohibition but was then active in Hollywood.

During his trial for shooting Oswald, Ruby’s legal team was fronted by Melvin Belli, a longtime friend and attorney of Cohen (Belli’s defense was that Ruby had suffered temporary insanity due to a bout of “psychomotor epilepsy”). [Michael Collins Piper, “Final Judgment: The Missing Link in the JFK Assassination Conspiracy“, American Free Press, 6th ed., 2005, p. 239.] In 1947, Cohen had succeeded Benjamin Siegelbaum, aka Bugsy Siegel (romanticized by Hollywood in 1991) at the head of “Murder Incorporated”. Cohen and Siegelbaum were accountable to Meyer Lansky (born Suchowljansky), the most powerful Jewish mafia boss, who had built part of his fortune with his Havana casinos and brothels, of which he was dispossessed by Castro in 1959. Lansky’s biographer Hank Messick describes him as the head of the ‘National Crime Syndicate’. “Thanks largely to Lansky, organized crime changed from an ugly growth on the body politic capable of being removed by surgery to a cancerous part of our economic and political systems.” Hank Messick, Lansky, Putnam’s Sons, 1971, p. 9.]”

Ruby’s [other] defense lawyer William Kunstler also claims in his memoir that Ruby told him: “I did it for the Jews,” repeating on several occasions: “I did this that they wouldn’t implicate Jews.” During Kunstler’s last visit Ruby handed him a note in which he reiterated that his motive was to “protect American Jews from a pogrom that could occur because of anger over the assassination.” [William Kunstler, My Life as a Radical Lawyer, Carol Publishing, 1994, p. 158.]⁶⁵ [to prevent a pogrom against them]. Police Chief Justice Earl Warren, when Ruby told him on June 7, 1964, “I have been used for a purpose,” [strangely] failed to ask him who had used him and for what purpose.⁶⁶

JFK was (reportedly) killed for a number of reasons, primarily his intent to stop Israel from developing nuclear weapons. Kennedy’s trip to Dallas was sponsored by an organization called the ‘Dallas Citizens Council‘, a group dominated by Jewish businessmen — a kind of front for the local “B’nai B’rith” section. [refer footnote on The Anti-Defamation League (ADL), formerly known as the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith] Kennedy’s welcoming committee in Dallas was chaired by Sam Bloom, a prominent member of the Texan Jewish community, whose name was found in Jack Ruby’s address book. It was Bloom who intervened with the Dallas Police Department to allow the press to film Oswald’s transfer, which gave Ruby an opportunity to shoot him dead.⁶⁷

Also refer Zionist Israel as the Assassination Nation [B3]

Rise and Kill First by New York Times reporter Ronen Bergman was a weighty study of the Mossad, Israel’s foreign intelligence service, together with its sister agencies. The author devoted six years of research to the project, which was based upon a thousand personal interviews and access to an enormous number of official documents previously unavailable. As suggested by the title, his primary focus was Israel’s long history of assassinations, and across his 750 pages and thousand-odd source references he recounts the details of an enormous number of such incidents. The sheer quantity of such foreign assassinations was really quite remarkable, with the knowledgeable reviewer in the New York Times suggesting that the Israeli total over the last half-century or so seemed far greater than that of any other nation… “I wouldn’t be surprised if Israel’s body-count greatly exceeded the combined total for that of all other major countries in the world.”

Also refer Mossad Whistleblower Victor Ostrovsky on Israeli Black Operations [B2]

Top quotes from his 1994 book, ‘The Other Side of Deception‘:⁶⁸

• “The entire Jewish lobby in the United States was mobilized.”
• “The ADL tarnished as anti-Semitic whomever they couldn’t sway to the Israeli cause.”
• “We have in this way recruited over eighty Palestinians this past year.”
• “Supporting the radical elements of Muslim fundamentalism sat well with the Mossad’s general plan for the region. () And if the Mossad could arrange for Hamas to take over the Palestinian streets from the PLO, then the picture would be complete.”
• “The ties between (British media mogul) Robert Maxwell and the Mossad went back a long way.”
• “The American invasion of Panama dried up the Mossad’s income from drug trafficking.”
• “These seminars that the Mossad was holding in the friendly environment of the country club were in fact well-oiled recruiting operations that had brought into the Mossad’s bank of manpower hundreds if not thousands of Western law enforcement personnel.”
• “He wasn’t really ‘bought,’ as they liked their politicians to be.”
• “The Mossad had direct links with the Jewish Defense League, the Anti-Defamation League of the B’nai Brith, the AIPAC, and the United Jewish Appeal.”
• “… an all-out psychological warfare attack aimed at getting the United States involved militarily in the Middle East in general and the Gulf area in particular.”

The Consequences of Usury

Now, 500 years after the Pope first permitted usury around 1500 AD, the process is complete, and all money is controlled by a small group of privately owned global banks. The average person is a debt-slave, subject to regimes of endless war, subject at any time to being imprisoned for the most trivial offenses, and now worthy only of being killed off by the latest disease or “plandemic.” It now appears that the nations […] controlled by the regime of usury have given up on world control and are trying merely to “secure the realm” (empire) by the ever-more perfect enslavement of their increasingly unhealthy and oppressed subject populations. Meanwhile, they push and probe around the perimeters looking for weaknesses among those nations who have said “no”.⁶⁹

As Georgetown historian Professor Carroll Quigley has noted, if it were possible to detail the asset portfolios of the banking plutocrats, one would find the title deeds of practically all the buildings, industries, farms, transport systems and mineral resources of the world. Accounting for this, Quigley wrote:

“Their secret is that they have annexed from governments, monarchies and republics the power to create the world’s money on debt terms requiring tribute both in principal and interest.”

Unfortunately, rather than benevolent rulers, this international banking plutocracy that comprises the cult has taken the Malthusian position that the world is overpopulated with serfs, and, at the highest levels, they are deadly serious about correcting this “threat” and “imbalance,” whatever the cost in human misery and suffering. — The Money Masters, 1996.

War in the Middle East, The Rothschilds. The Confidential Pentagon Memo: “Take Out 7 Countries… Finishing off Iran” [C2]

The central figures in this Global Elite (the cult) are members of the Rothschild family, who have operated at the center of this Elite since the late 18^th century and exercise staggering control over many key aspects of the global economy, starting with banking, energy, weapons, mining, infrastructure (including railways), media and biotechnology. Their estimated wealth exceeds $US100 trillion. Since the beginning of their reign, the Rothschilds have acquired a vast global network of income-producing assets by investing in a phenomenal variety and number of ventures, usually leaving another name prominently on display of any newly acquired asset, including those acquired or partly acquired as a result of saving a corporation from bankruptcy, such as Donald Trump’s resort.^{70 71}

As noted above, two industries that the Rothschilds dominate are banking and the weapons industry. It is well-documented that the Rothschilds have helped finance both sides of most wars since the Napoleonic wars in the early 19th century. [They were also important in the bolshevik revolution in Russia and the establishment of Israel as a state in the early 20th century]

In these circumstances, the Rothschilds profit from weapons sales to most or all parties to all wars as well as the loans to buy the weapons and the loans to pay for reconstruction post-war. [This ‘pragmatic’ support for all parties involved in violence continues to the present day]

To wit: More than 500 jihadists cared for at the Ziv Medical Centre (in Israel) [B2]

Several journalists who were participating in a media tour organised by the Australia/Israel and Jewish Affairs Council (AIJAC) were able to visit the Ziv Medical Centre, in Zefat (North Israël). One stayed with some of the patients in order to hear their stories. She was thus able to confirm that more than 500 were members of Al-Qaïda, wounded during the fighting in Syria. The jihadists had kidnapped the UN observers from the Philippines and Fiji charged with keeping an eye on the cease-fire line in occupied Golan. During negotiations for their release, the United Nations paid a ransom to Al-Qaïda which was then transferred to a bank account without provoking any international inquiry in order to identify the beneficiary. Finally, the Blue Helmets retreated, so that today, the Israeli and Syrian armies are separated not by the UNO, but by Al-Qaïda. In September 2014, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu created a photo-op in this hospital when he came to visit and praise the Al-Qaïda jihadists. [this support is still happening]

Central banker tells his nephew: We control the press and the politicians [F3]

The Bank for International Settlements (“BIS”) is the central hub of this scam. It controls 60 central banks, including the Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank and the Bank of England, and oversees 95% of the world’s money. Every 6-8 weeks, meetings of top central bankers are held to receive instructions from big banking dynasties such as the Rothschilds, Warburgs and Rockefellers. These people ultimately pull the financial strings of the entire planet.

The real power lies within the inner core, the Bilderberg Steering Committee. Past members of this inner ring include Baron Edmond de Rothschild, David Rockefeller and Henry Kissinger, while current members include Eric Schmidt, long-time executive chairman of Alphabet, YouTube and Google’s mother company; Peter Thiel, and the editors of both Bloomberg and the Economist, the latter in which the Rothschild family has held major shares for decades.

The Council on Foreign Relations, Bilderberg Group and the Trilateral Commission in their turn are interwoven with a dense global network of financial institutions such as the World Bank, IMF, World Trade Organisation and the Bank for International Settlements; military and political institutions such as NATO, the European Union and the United Nations; think tanks such as the Atlantic Council, RAND Corporation, the Brookings Institute, the Project for a New American Century and the Fabian Society; secret societies and conference groups such as Le Cercle, the Club of Rome and Bohemian Grove; tax-exempt foundations such as the Rockefeller, Ford and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundations; and a whole range of people in government, media, multinational corporations and other positions of power in society.

Richard Solomon writes:

“China’s governing political party is called the Communist Party of China (CPC). However, I don’t think one needs to be a professor of economics to realize that China doesn’t practice Marxist communism. So why does China retain the communist label? Respect. Respect for whom? Respect for the brave men and women who delivered China from Jewish-Anglo-European-Japanese exploitation and the Century of Humiliation. Respecting the sacrifices made by elders and ancestors runs deep in Chinese culture. Whether China keeps the communist label in perpetuity, or retires it after a respectful timeframe for something that more accurately reflects its real-world model is an internal Chinese matter … I view capitalism as China’s dominant economic production mechanism. I view socialism as China’s dominant economic control mechanism. Like a motor with a control switch. Put simply, the state dominates the corporation and bank.”

“Components of traditional public-welfare socialism also exist within China, e.g., socialized medicine, free college, nationalized banks. The big difference between “Wall Street capitalism” and “socialism with Chinese characteristics” is that the latter has the capacity for intelligent adaptation and positive evolution, while the former is impervious to reform and can only grow more predatory, corrupt, and violent.

In the US, the corporation and bank dominate the state, or to take it one step further, the state is the corporation and bank – and the Zionist Lobby. This makes for an “interesting times” economic hybrid. A fusion of neoliberal capitalism, corporate socialism, techno-police statism, and Jewish* supremacism. I call it ‘ZioCorp.’ (*No offense to non-involved Jews. For the record, I identify as a Jewish Hebrew Israelite who follows the Tao.)”

“While perhaps not an exact benchmark, 1965 heralded the end of the middle class miracle, although it took around five years to notice. 1965 represented full force entry into Vietnam, which ballooned debt and kicked off early 1970s inflation. Replacement of White Anglo Saxon gatekeepers in media, business, think tanks, universities, and finance by Jews took off in or around 1965, paving the way for the current US Judeo-Zionist oligarchy. The “Holocaust Industry” narrative also helped.⁷² 1965 marked the non-European mass-migration Hart-Cellar Act, which like the post-US Civil War “Northern Industrialist-Great Britain/Rothschild” engineered Irish, Southern and Eastern European mass-migrations, raised rents and lowered wages for legacy Americans, who in the latter 19th / early 20th century were majority Anglo-Saxon.”

“September 11, 2001, marked the official end of the American republic or what remained of it. Granted, America was always an oligarchic republic with some democratic checks and balances, and the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 stripped America of its economic sovereignty, but now it was truly over. Following the Mossad/US Deep State-orchestrated 9/11 attacks,⁷³ the police state, endless war, corruption, torture and psyops ramped up with no internal safeguards left to resist the onslaught. The “Greater Israel Project” became a key component of US foreign policy, as Jewish Zionists held the dominant faction within US oligarchy.”

“To reiterate, I’m not anti-Jew… “Post-Talmudic cellular memory” Jews have an important role in the future human ecosystem. As do all groups. I’m not going to review “Big Jew” financial predation. Rather, I want to focus on China’s 19th and 20th century encounters with global Jewish finance and its mercenaries as well as the impact of international Jewry’s “thesis-antithesis-synthesis” on the collective Chinese psyche.”⁷⁴

The Power of the Press

In March, 1915 the oligarch (cult) interests, the steel, shipbuilding, and powder interests, and their subsidiary organizations, got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and a sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily press of the United States. These men worked the problem out by selecting 179 newspapers, and then began, by an elimination process, to retain only those necessary for the purpose of controlling the general policy of the daily press in the country. They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers. [protocol 12 above]

The 25 papers were agreed upon; emissaries were sent to purchase the policy, national and international, of these papers; an agreement was reached; the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies, and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interests of the purchasers (the cult). This policy included the suppression of everything that opposed the wishes of the purchasers.^{75 76} This also supported another major project of the cult …, to marginalize Christianity and other cultural values while hiding behind the façade of “civil liberties” [now DEI].

More recently, the formal creation by the UK BBC of the ‘Trusted News Initiative‘ (TNI) involving most of the largest media organisations in the world has also played its part. The TNI formed in 2019 to protect audiences and users from disinformation, particularly around moments of jeopardy, such as elections.⁷⁷ This was in response to the exponential growth in social media platforms critical of government narratives, such as covid, and/or cult activities for gain, such as the genocide in Gaza. [and elections!]

This is why we now have governments around the world in the process of implementing misinformation legislation to criminalise free speech, including by journalists, activists and the public, for example Dr. Reiner Fuellmich ⁷⁸ and Professor Annelise Orleck.⁷⁹ Alternatively, anti-terror legislation is used to suppress and arrest people involved in even peaceful protests, for example four people aged between 58 and 78 were arrested at peaceful pro-Palestine protests in Edinburgh in July 2025.⁸⁰ Lawfare in action.

The same methodology is always used by the cult to achieve its goals. They use their vast wealth to buy influence, control or ownership of important businesses, organisations or institutions, both privately and publicly (government) owned, or fund and/or sponsor the decision makers within them. If this does not work, they use “other means” such as blackmail, slander or lawfare, etc. They then use a “top down” approach to implement their goals at the expense of others.⁸¹

Given one definition of war is ‘a struggle or competition between opposing forces or for a particular end‘,⁸² we are all in an undeclared war with the cult and its agents and adherents. They mean to profit by implementing strategies and policies without any concern that these may be causing the rest of of us harm. In fact this is preferred –refer depopulation research[B2] – and we are at significant risk of injury, illness, poverty, misery and early death. For example, another issue that’s proved a deal-breaker for America Firsters is the freedom to protest Israel, which Trump first infringed through the universities and [he] is now threatening to withhold natural disaster relief to any states or cities that boycott Israeli companies—what is fundamentally a First Amendment right. If there is a single moral to the story of AIPAC’s influence, it is that Jewish (Zionist) and Israeli lobbies are unnatural disasters on American civil liberty.⁸³

1. https://socialjusticeaustralia.com.au/judaism-vs-zionism-a-global-conflict/ [B2] ↩︎
2. https://www.unz.com/ishamir/gaza-revelation/ [C3] ↩︎
3. https://www.academia.edu/42658269/Between_Ethics_and_Jewish_Law_Torat_Ha_Melekh_and_the_Moral_Problems_of_Contemporary_Halakhic_Discourse ↩︎
4. https://lonewolves.info/?p=5837 ↩︎
5. https://youtu.be/lB81oO3EYUs?si=9LvBPbd0QM3J_y2t – Professor Sachs from 0:30 secs ↩︎
6. https://www.unz.com/imercer/israelis-not-sweating-sde-teiman-rape-prosecutors-only-concern-leaked-rape-tape-undermines-israels-international-legal-impunity/ ↩︎
7. Commander Carr has had a distinguished naval career. During World War One he served as Navigating Officer of H.M. Submarines. In World War Two he was Naval Control Officer for the St. Lawrence; then Staff Officer Operations at Shelbourne, N.S.; then Senior Naval Officer at Goose Bay, Labrador. As an author he has previously published seven books. Some were specially bound for inclusion in The Royal Library; The Library of The Imperial War Museum; and the Sir Millington Drake Library (bequeathed to Eton College), and the Braille Library for the Blind. Several of his books were published in European languages. He toured Canada for the Canadian Clubs in 1930-31. He warned people of the existence of an International Conspiracy. He foretold that the conspirators would, unless checked, drag the World into another Global War. In the years between 1931 and 1939 he addressed Social and Service Clubs all over Ontario. [C6] ↩︎
8. https://plusdemocracy.blogspot.com/2012/02/1773-mayer-rothschilds-25-point-plan.html [F6] ↩︎
9. https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-the-protocols-of-the-elders-of-zion/ ↩︎
10. https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-the-protocols-of-the-elders-of-zion/ ↩︎
11. “He then outlined a 25 point plan on how to accomplish it.” in ‘The Federal Reserve: History of Lies, Thievery, and Deceit‘ by Dr. Ken Matto, Former Congressional Candidate, 6th District NJ, and “Before Rockefeller, There Was Rothschild“, By Deanna Spingola, 3/27/2008] ↩︎
12. “The B’nai B’rith is a secretive, but extremely powerful and influential order of Freemasonry. It is, for example, the parent organization of the Anti-Defamation League of the B’nai B’rith (ADL), which has a great deal of influence with legislators and law enforcement agencies across America. It is also the parent of Hillel, an organization for Jewish students found on virtually every college campus in the United States. The New York Times can be called a B’nai B’rith newspaper due to its ownership by the Sulzberger family, one of the leading families of B’nai B’rith Lodge No. 1 in New York City.”
    From Solving 9-11: The Deception That Changed The World, by Christopher Bollyn [B3] ↩︎
13. http://24protocols.com/post/the-protocols/ – by Victor E. Marsden (1922) [F3] ↩︎
14. http://24protocols.com/post/the-protocols/ – by Victor E. Marsden (1922) [F3] ↩︎
15. “The Dark Forces in Control of the Anglo-American-Zionist Empire Are the Source of the World Crisis“. Richard C. Cook [B3] ↩︎
16. Footnote 44 in “Secrets of the Federal Reserve” by Eustace Mullins [C3] ↩︎
17. ‘The Web of Debt’ by E.H. Brown, pg 125. Second edition [C3] ↩︎
18. http://unz.com/article/unsettled-history-the-useful-abuse-of-the-holocaust/ ↩︎
19. Quoted in: Ingrid Weckert, Feuerzeichen: Die “Reichskristallnacht” (Tübingen: Grabert, 1981), p. 212. See also: Th. Herzl, The Jewish State (New York: Herzl Press, 1970), pp. 33, 35, 36, and, Edwin Black, The Transfer Agreement (New York: Macmillan, 1984), p. 73 ↩︎
20. Th. Herzl, “Der Kongress,” Welt, June 4, 1897. Reprinted in: Theodor Herzls zionistische Schriften (Leon Kellner, ed.), erster Teil, Berlin: Jüdischer Verlag, 1920, p. 190 (and p. 139) ↩︎
21. https://knowwhois.com/post/who-is-chaim-weizmann [C2] ↩︎
22. https://modernhistoryproject.org/mhp?Article=ControZion&C=24.0 [F6] ↩︎
23. Standrowicz, History of the Jews in Russia [F3] ↩︎
24. https://jewishstudies.ceu.edu/sites/jewishstudies.ceu.edu/files/attachment/basicpage/45/01krajewski.pdf ↩︎
25. https://themillenniumreport.com/2018/07/the-nyc-and-london-banker-who-financed-the-bolshevik-revolution/ ↩︎
26. https://www.maier-files.com/the-hidden-ties-that-bound-wall-street-to-the-bolshevik-revolution/ ↩︎
27. From The Controversy of Zion, by Douglas Reed (Omni Christian Book Club); One of the best writings for students on the origins and evolution of Modern Zionism.  From Bible writings to the present including Adam Weishaupt and the Illuminati to Alger Hiss and Harry Dexter White. Controversy of Zion sat collecting dust for over 20 years before it was finally published in 1978 by dolphin Press in Natal, South Africa. When you read his books you’ll understand why… remembering who controls the press, radio, t.v., movies and publishing houses.]  ↩︎
28. From The Controversy of Zion, by Douglas Reed (Omni Christian Book Club); One of the best writings for students on the origins and evolution of Modern Zionism.  From Bible writings to the present including Adam Weishaupt and the Illuminati to Alger Hiss and Harry Dexter White. Controversy of Zion sat collecting dust for over 20 years before it was finally published in 1978 by dolphin Press in Natal, South Africa. When you read his books you’ll understand why… remembering who controls the press, radio, t.v., movies and publishing houses.]  ↩︎
29. “The Dark Forces in Control of the Anglo-American-Zionist Empire Are the Source of the World Crisis“. Richard C. Cook [B3] ↩︎
30. The Controversy of Zion, Douglas Reed • 1978 ↩︎
31. Profiting from Genocide [C2] ↩︎
32. The Controversy of Zion, Douglas Reed • 1978 ↩︎
33. https://codoh.com/library/document/jewish-involvement-bolshevik-revolution/#_edn8 ↩︎
34. Encyclopedia Judaica, Jerusalem, Israel: Keter Publishing House Ltd., 1971, Vol. 5, pp. 792-793 ↩︎
35. Trotsky, Leon, Stalin: An Appraisal of the Man and His Influence, translated by Charles Malamuth, London: MacGibbon & Kee, 1968 ↩︎
36. Rapoport, Louis, Stalin’s War Against the Jews: The Doctors’ Plot and the Soviet Solution, New York: The Free Press, 1990, pp. 30-31 ↩︎
37. Rappoport, Angelo S., The Pioneers of the Russian Revolution, London: Stanley, Paul and Co., 1918, p.250 ↩︎
38. Ben-Shlomo, B. Z., “Reporting on Lenin’s Jewish Roots,” Jewish Chronicle, July 26, 1991, p.2 ↩︎
39. The American Hebrew, Sept. 10, 1920, pp. 434, 507 ↩︎
40. Elmhurst, Ernest F., The World Hoax, 1938, p.41 ↩︎
41. “THE REVOLUTION EXTENDS” – a forty-page chapter in Doug Reed’s book, The Controversy of Zion ↩︎
42. https://deanhenderson.substack.com/p/the-council-on-foreign-relations-dcb ↩︎
43. THE NAMELESS WAR, By CAPTAIN A.H.M. RAMSAY [F6]
    Arrested under Regulation 18b on the 23rd May, 1940, he was detained, without charge or trial, in a cell in Brixton Prison until the 26th September, 1944. [F3] ↩︎
44. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archibald_Maule_Ramsay [B3] ↩︎
45. https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-charles-a-lindbergh-and-the-america-first-movement/ [B3] ↩︎
46. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America_First_Committee [F3] ↩︎
47. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0njOPNr8K0 [A1] ↩︎
48. 1983 publication of Zionism in the Age of the Dictators by Lenni Brenner ↩︎
49. Memo of June 21, 1933, in: L. Dawidowicz, A Holocaust Reader (New York: Behrman, 1976), pp. 150–155, and (in part) in: Francis R. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the Palestine Question (Austin: Univ. of Texas, 1985), p. 42.; On Zionism in Germany before Hitler’s assumption of power, see: Donald L. Niewyk, The Jews in Weimar Germany (Baton Rouge: 1980), pp. 94–95, 126–131, 140–143.; F. Nicosia, Third Reich (Austin: 1985), pp. 1–15 ↩︎
50. Jüdische Rundschau (Berlin), June 13, 1933. Quoted in: Heinz Höhne, The Order of the Death’s Head (New York: Ballantine, pb., 1971, 1984), pp. 376–377 ↩︎
51. On the Agreement in general, see: Werner Feilchenfeld, et al., Haavara-Transfer nach Palästina (Tübingen: Mohr/Siebeck, 1972).; David Yisraeli, “The Third Reich and the Transfer Agreement,” Journal of Contemporary History (London), No. 2, 1971, pp. 129–148.; “Haavara,” Encyclopaedia Judaica (1971), vol. 7, pp. 1012–1013.; F. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the Palestine Question (Austin: 1985), pp. 44–49.; Raul Hilberg, The Destruction of the European Jews (New York: Holmes and Meier, 1985), pp. 140–141.; The Transfer Agreement, by Edwin Black, is detailed and useful. However, it contains numerous inaccuracies and wildly erroneous conclusions. See, for example, the review by Richard S. Levy in Commentary, Sept. 1984, pp. 68–71 ↩︎
52. https://codoh.com/library/document/zionism-and-the-third-reich/#ref7 ↩︎
53. “Berlin,” Encyclopaedia Judaica (New York and Jerusalem: 1971), Vol. 5, p. 648. For a look at one aspect of this “vigorous life,” see: J.-C. Horak, “Zionist Film Propaganda in Nazi Germany,” Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1984, pp. 49–58 ↩︎
54. Israel Shahak, “Yitzhak Shamir, Then and Now,” Middle East Policy (Washington, DC), Vol. 1, No. 1, (Whole No. 39), 1992, pp. 27–38.; Yehoshafat Harkabi, Israel’s Fateful Hour (New York: Harper and Row, 1988), pp. 213–214. Quoted in: Andrew J. Hurley, Israel and the New World Order (Santa Barbara, Calif.: 1991), pp. 93, 208–209.; Avishai Margalit, “The Violent Life of Yitzhak Shamir,” New York Review of Books, May 14, 1992, pp. 18–24.; Lenni Brenner, Zionism in the Age of the Dictators (1983), pp. 266–269.; L. Brenner, Jews in America Today (1986), pp. 175–177.; L. Brenner, “Yitzhak Shamir: On Hitler’s Side,” Arab Perspectives (League of Arab States), March 1984, pp. 11–13 ↩︎
55. Zionist Terrorism, What Is Left for Hamas? [F2] ↩︎
56. https://www.globalresearch.ca/bibi-created-palestinian-state/5901145 ↩︎
57. https://www.unz.com/article/the-holocaust-of-six-million-jews-in-world-war-i/#footnote_19 ↩︎
58. From Major Jordan’s Diaries (1952) … on May 10, 1942, Major Jordan reported to “UNITED NATIONS DEPOT NO. 8, LEND-LEASE DIVISION, NEWARK AIRPORT, NEWARK, NEW JERSEY, INTERNATIONAL SECTION, AIR SERVICE COMMAND, AIR CORPS, U.S. ARMY.” How could that be? U.S. history and government documents assert that the U.S. didn’t join the United Nations until three and a half years later! October 24th, 1945. And then again. . . read the shocking revelations from Major Jordan’s Diaries about the billions of dollars, airplanes, tanks, munitions, foodstuffs, whole factories, blueprints and material for building the Atomic Bomb, personal luxuries for … Communist rulers, as well as the paper and plates enabling them to print U.S. Federal Reserve Notes — all this sent to the U.S.S.R. from UN Depot No 8, Newark ↩︎
59. http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/israel/protocols.htm ↩︎
60. https://askbib.com/social-issues/neo-colonialism-vs-imperialism [F2] ↩︎
61. https://thisvsthat.io/settler-colonialism-vs-zionism [F2] ↩︎
62. https://www.voltairenet.org/article222826.html ↩︎
63. https://www.unz.com/article/bootstraps-or-bailouts-the-hidden-truth-of-israels-military-power/ [C3] ↩︎
64. https://forward.com/news/187793/lee-harvey-oswalds-killer-jack-ruby-came-from-stro/ [C2] ↩︎
65. Jack Ruby: Israel’s Smoking Gun [B3] ↩︎
66. Seth Kantor, The Ruby Cover-Up, Zebra Books , 1980, p. 49. ↩︎
67. https://www.tehrantimes.com/news/454926/Israel-is-behind-serial-assassinations-of-Kennedy-brothers-Laurent [C3] ↩︎
68. https://www.sott.net/article/394967-Victor-Ostrovsky-on-Mossads-manipulation-of-the-world ↩︎
69. Usury: The Crime of the Ages. “Bankers’ Greed”, Richard C. Cook, Global Research, May 22, 2024 [B3] ↩︎
70. https://www.forbes.com/sites/chasewithorn/2016/12/08/trump-and-his-commerce-secretary-wilbur-ross-a-look-at-25-years-of-connections/ ↩︎
71. https://anr.news/state-of-affairs/wilbur-ross-the-king-of-bankruptcy-worked-as-bankruptcy-advisor-for-rothschild-investments-for-25-years/ ↩︎
72. “… the holocaust thesis is unique in the modern world. It is the secular equivalent of challenging Church doctrine in Renaissance Italy or deriding Islam in the early Caliphates (and perhaps some places today), lacking only physical immolation or drawing and quartering as its ultimate penalties. This has nothing to do with the validity of the holocaust narrative itself. Jews control in the West generally and in America in particular, the lion’s share (and more) of the media and the entertainment media. They rank high in finance and in donations to political causes. In 2020, for example, the ten largest donors to the Democrats and the eight largest donors to the Republicans were Jewish billionaires. They are prominent in politics, academe, and courts in this country, and significant throughout the West. Media, money, and the force of law are a formidable combination, and Jewish groups (plus those supporting them) have used it to enact laws and to “persuade” politicians to favor their cause – or else… But the actual, unedited historical record indicates they did not, and that there is “…no evidence whatever at the camps in Axis occupied Europe of a deliberate policy to exterminate the Jews” unz.com/article/unsettled-history-the-useful-abuse-of-the-holocaust/ ↩︎
73. https://www.unz.com/article/israel-did-9-11/ ↩︎
74. https://www.unz.com/article/chinas-techno-economic-balance-learning-from-americas-mistakes/ ↩︎
75. Congressman Callaway’s statement in The Congressional Record, February 9,1917, Vol. 54, pp. 2947-48 ↩︎
76. http://washingtonsblog.com/2012/01/1917-j-p-morgan-bought-us-corporate-media-to-be-1s-lying-sacks-of-spin.html [F6] ↩︎
77. https://www.bbc.co.uk/beyondfakenews/trustinnews [F3] ↩︎
78. https://worldcouncilforhealth.substack.com/p/scandal-in-germany-update-on-the [B3] ↩︎
79. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/03/us/dartmouth-professor-police-protests.html [F3] ↩︎
80. https://www.wmur.com/article/dartmouth-professor-arrest-protest-5224/60674677 [B2] ↩︎
81. https://www.youtube.com/live/N3j50GbcT2k?si=6Wrhea1XblbpsHys ↩︎
82. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/war [A1] ↩︎
83. https://www.unz.com/article/bootstraps-or-bailouts-the-hidden-truth-of-israels-military-power/ [C3] ↩︎