Quote from Professor Martin Pall, Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences at Washington State University, a specialist in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, multiple chemical sensitivity, and the effects of low-intensity microwave frequency electromagnetic fields on the human body.
“Putting (out) tens of millions of 5G antennas, without a single biological test of safety, has to be about the stupidest idea anyone has had in the history of the world.”
There is nothing demonstrably safe about many 5G, AI and EMF capabilities. Indeed, advances in related fields directly support cult activities across the spectrum [as outlined in just about all site chapters]. This includes both direct physical damage to humanity and our environment, as well as the imposition of enormous costs in both lives and finances from its use. In fact, there is no area usually deemed important in sustaining a reasonable quality of life that cannot be targeted [and is].
Research from ten new studies [B3] contradicts the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection guidelines,1 demonstrating various harmful biological effects of radiofrequency radiation (RFR) on humans and the environment, including its potential cancer risk. During the development of the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection’s (ICNIRP’s) 2020 radiofrequency EMF guidelines some gaps in the available data were identified. An evaluation of these research areas identified the following data gaps:2
- Issues concerning relations between radiofrequency EMF exposure and heat-induced pain;
- Relation between whole-body exposure and core temperature rise from 100 kHz to 300 GHz, as a function of exposure duration and combined EMF exposures;
- Adverse effect thresholds and thermal dosimetry for a range of ocular structures;
- Pain thresholds for contact currents under a range of exposure scenarios, including associated dosimetry; and
- A range of additional dosimetry studies to both support future research, and also to improve the application of radiofrequency EMF exposure restrictions in future guidelines.
In fact there are hundreds of scientific studies and research papers showing the biological effects of electromagnetic and microwave radiation on our health and the environment.
Refer Electromagnetic Sense Ireland [C2] for research links, including the Environmental Health Trust [B2] – that provides a further comprehensive list of up to date studies and research.
Health Risks associated with 5G exposure [B1]
Research Studies to Know
- A review published in ‘Experimental Oncology’ found “alarming epidemiological and experimental data on possible carcinogenic effects of long term exposure to low intensity microwave (MW) radiation.” Even a year of operation of a powerful base transmitting station for mobile communication reportedly resulted in a dramatic increase of cancer incidence among the population living nearby (Yakymenko 2011).
- European Parliament requested a research report “Health Impact of 5G” which was released in July 2021 and concluded that commonly used RFR frequencies (450 to 6000 MHz) are probably carcinogenic for humans and clearly affect male fertility with possible adverse effects on the development of embryos, fetuses and newborns.
- A large-scale animal study published in ‘Environmental Research’ found rats exposed to cell tower emission RF levels had elevated cancers, the very same cancers also found in the US National Toxicology Program animal study of cell phone RF. Falcioni 2018
- A study published in ‘Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine’ found changes in blood considered biomarkers predictive of cancer in people living closer to cell antenna arrays (Zothansiama 2017).
- A study published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health found higher exposure to cell arrays linked to higher mortality from all cancer and specifically lung and breast cancer (Rodrigues 2021).
- A 10 year study published in ‘Science of the Total Environment’ on cell phone antennas by the local Municipal Health Department and several universities in Brazil found a clearly elevated relative risk of cancer mortality at residential distances of 500 meters or less from cell phone towers (Dode 2011).
- A study commissioned by the Government of Styria, Austria found a significant cancer incidence in the area around the transmitter as well as significant exposure-effect relationships between radiofrequency radiation exposure and the incidence of breast cancers and brain tumors (Oberfeld 2008).
Deadly Rainbow [C2]
The document discusses the potential dangers of 5G technology and its implications for life on Earth, referencing Arthur Firstenberg’s work. The article questions whether 5G technology could lead to the extinction of all life on Earth. It references Arthur Firstenberg’s book, “Invisible Rainbow: History of Electricity,” which explores the role of electricity in life. Firstenberg argues that understanding electricity is crucial for comprehending life and its healing properties, as well as the threats posed by its misuse.
Health Impacts of Electromagnetic Fields [B1]
The ‘Children’s’ Health Defense‘ asserts that over the past several decades, numerous [literally thousands] scientific publications (referenced) have demonstrated the harmful effects of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) exposure from wireless sources – such as smartphones, Wi-Fi routers, cell towers, smart meters and other Internet of Things (IoT) devices – at levels well below maximum federal exposure limits. Despite this body of evidence, federal exposure guidelines have remained unchanged since first implemented in 1996 and an unprecedented proliferation of wireless sources has been imposed upon an uninformed public.
Ten New Studies Detail Health Risks of 5G [B3]
Studies also reveal 5G’s potential to induce neurological damage and psychiatric problems, highlighting its effects on brain development, including the increased risk of conditions like dementia. 5G induces cell death in the amygdala, a region of the brain involved in emotion regulation, memory, and decision-making.
In September 2019, the Minister for Communications, Hon. Paul Fletcher MP asked the Committee to complete and inquiry into the “deployment, adoption and application of 5G in Australia.” In response, Paul Barratt, on behalf of ‘ElectricSense‘, submitted a document, available as a download from aph.org, stating, in part:
“5G is dangerous and will harm every living being. Thousands of studies link low-level wireless radio frequency radiation exposures to a long list of adverse biological effects, including:
- DNA single and double strand breaks
- oxidative damage
- disruption of cell metabolism
- increased blood brain barrier permeability
- melatonin reduction
- disruption to brain glucose metabolism
- generation of stress proteins
Cellphone Radiation Research Was Halted After Worrisome Findings, Experts Question Why [B2]
Decades of animal research point to serious health risks from cellphone radiation exposure, but examining a possible link stops now. The National Toxicology Program (NTP), tasked with studying potential toxins, recently announced it would no longer investigate evidence that cellphone radiation can harm animals or people. The NTP published results in 2018 from two-year toxicology studies showing “clear evidence” of associations between 2G/3G cellphone radiation and tumors in male rats. Follow-up research in 2019 revealed DNA damage in the brains, livers, and blood cells of exposed rats and mice.
Case Reports: The microwave syndrome after installation of 5G [B2
These case reports discuss individuals who developed microwave syndrome symptoms after the installation of a 5G base station in close proximity. Symptoms included neurological issues, tinnitus, fatigue, insomnia, emotional distress, skin disorders, and blood pressure variability. Significant increases in RF radiation levels were recorded after the installation of the 5G base station. The cases emphasize the inadequacy of current safety guidelines regarding RF radiation exposure.
Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure on cancer in animal studies [B1]
The findings of this systematic review indicate that there is evidence that RF EMF exposure increases the incidence of cancer in experimental animals with the CoE being strongest for malignant heart schwannomas and gliomas.
Direct Smartphone Exposure Triggers Rapid Red Blood Cell Aggregation [B2]
Ultrasound imaging reveals potential cardiovascular risks from prolonged smartphone contact with the body. All potential biological harms from smartphones and their emitted EMFs should have been thoroughly studied decades ago—before mass deployment.
5G – Advanced Technology for Our Wellbeing or Grid Dystopia? [C2]
5G has been sold as being central to a world-wide technological development (or dystopia depending on your viewpoint) called the IOT (Internet of Things). This involves smart cities and buildings, transport infrastructures, etc., and facilitates surveillance and data collection on a vast scale. However, with the deployment of 5G, every person and every living thing is subjected to a massive increase in radiation exposure from millions of new network antennas and billions of mobile phone and electronic devices that make up the smart grid and the IOT.
5G has been rolled out extremely fast without any pre-testing for long-term health effects. (They were even rolling out 5G during the ‘lockdown’ of the fake pandemic five years ago.) Thus, It is a live experiment and we are the test subjects. Despite numerous studies that radiation from existing wireless technology causes adverse health effects, very few national governments banned the rollouts, which require the installation of millions of extra antennae, to be placed closer to homes, schools, hospitals etc.
5G Danger: 13 Reasons 5G Wireless Technology Will be a Catastrophe for Humanity [C3]
Radiofrequency radiation (RF or RFR) and electromagnetic fields (EMF) are being increasingly recognized as new types of pollution – environmental pollution. The document outlines 13 reasons exposing the 5G danger, which could turn into an unmitigated health and privacy catastrophe if enough people don’t rise up to stop it.
Everyone who hears the truth about 5G shuns it and for good reason [F3]
Overview: The document discusses concerns about 5G technology, its potential health risks, and public resistance against its rollout.
5G Technology Concerns
- 5G is portrayed as a military weapon communications technology, not just an upgrade from 4G.
- Increased exposure to higher frequencies and signal aggregation may pose health risks.
- The European Union and other institutions are facing public backlash against 5G deployment.
Public Resistance
- Many individuals and leaders are becoming educated about the risks of 5G and are opposing its rollout.
- Claire Edwards highlights the need for public awareness to combat the acceptance of 5G.
- The document suggests that even proponents of 5G are not fully supportive of its implementation.
Health Implications
- A French court recognized electro-hypersensitivity (EHS) as an occupational disease linked to radiation exposure.
- The document implies that current safety standards may not adequately protect public health.
Call to Action
- The document urges readers to support independent journalism to counteract mainstream media narratives.
- It emphasizes the need for public involvement to halt the 5G satellite plan and protect health.
EMF and EMP for Compliance and War
For governments it is not difficult to pulse the cell phone signals in the brain frequencies and in this way manipulate the thoughts of their own or foreign citizens.3 The difference between pulsed microwaves and extra long electromagnetic waves is that pulsed microwaves can be targeted on one person (or the whole nation if cell phone signals are pulsed in brain frequencies) while extra long electromagnetic waves, transmitted in brain frequencies, with their length up to 300 hundred thousands kilometers will reach brains in large areas. For sure so far the legislations around the world (except the Chile and Brazil) do not prohibit such actions to the governments or anybody else on human brains (for example Elon Musk is building system of 20.000 satellites around the planet and working on neuralink research at the same time).
Also refer Agentic Artificial Intelligence to Control Human Agentic “Robots”. [F3]
In a psychological context, the meaning of the word agentic is different. Here, it refers to the famous psychologist, Stanley Milgram, and his Agentic State Theory, which describes how people sometimes obediently transfer responsibility for their actions to an authority figure, essentially surrendering their personal agency and becoming an agent for an authority figure.
A peer-reviewed study “Clinical Manifestations of Iatrogenic Magnetism in Subjects After Receiving COVID-19 Injectables: Case Report Series” [C3] has confirmed that surging reports of “iatrogenic magnetism” are caused by “massive metallic objects” that are forming inside the bodies of people who received Covid mRNA “vaccines.
This may explain 5G Technology and induction of coronavirus in skin cells [F3] – that indicates coronaviruses can be triggered by 5G. [scary: 5G -> pandemics]
Case Study on Smearing: Dr Rashid A. Buttar [B2]
Rubik/Brown concluded that there is a substantial overlap in pathobiology between Covid and WCR exposure. “We propose a link between adverse bioeffects of WCR exposure from wireless devices and Covid-19,” the study authors wrote.
“Evidence presented here supports a premise that WCR and, in particular, 5G, which involves densification of 4G, may have exacerbated the Covid-19 pandemic by weakening host immunity and increasing SARS-CoV-2 virulence.
“WCR exposure is a widespread, yet often neglected, environmental stressor that can produce a wide range of adverse bioeffects. For decades, independent research scientists worldwide have emphasised the health risks and cumulative damage caused by WCR. The evidence presented here is consistent with a large body of established research. Healthcare workers and policymakers should consider WCR a potentially toxic environmental stressor. Methods for reducing WCR exposure should be provided to all patients and the general population.”
Considering a report published in Oncology Letters in October 2020 we wonder if Rubik/Brown’s advice will be heeded. The Oncology Letter’s report declared that the evaluation, requested and endorsed by more than 390 scientists and medical doctors, of RF radiation health risks from 5G technology was ignored in a report by a government expert group in Switzerland and a publication from The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (“ICNIRP”).
Sabrina Wallace, the Global Information Grid, and Electromagnetic Warfare [F3]
Wallace and I (Prof. David Hughes) appear to have certain things in common:
- the belief that a nefarious agenda is being followed to hook human bodies up to an external control network;
- willingness to examine primary source material that otherwise hides in plain sight because people have been primed to look in the wrong places. Wallace seems particularly strong on IEEE documentation;
- a sense of historical consciousness; and
- condemnation of the professions that, through their cowardice and complicity, have helped to facilitate the building of a biodigital slavery system.
As Wallace observes, we are fundamentally dealing with eugenics: “The people who run these systems run them for forms of human husbandry and complete control.” The human herd is to be cultivated through changes to its biology. Consent is not required given that the whole point is the creation of a biodigital slavery system.
Also refer David A. Hughes, Digital Technologies as Weapons [C3]
The aim of the Omniwar is to subjugate the world’s population under a technocratic control system. This cannot be done through conventional weaponry, or by killing as many people as possible. Rather, digital technologies become the primary weapons platform. Facial recognition software and AI-guided weaponry, developed by companies such as Anduril Industries, OpenAI, and Palantir, have been tested in Ukraine and Gaza. Ukraine is being refashioned as a “digital state” via WEF “GovTech” solutions, and similar measures are being introduced transnationally. DOGE, Stargate, and AI.gov show that the technocratic takeover of the United States is advancing rapidly.
“Smart” technologies increasingly enable the ubiquitous, real-time surveillance and monitoring of everyone and everything. “Smart” phones, designed to be addictive, are the gateway drugs that have rendered almost everyone dependent on technologies that serve as weapons of cognitive warfare.
Algorithms foster echo chambers, eroding democratic discourse. Loneliness proliferates, with chatbots harvesting intimate data via affection systems. AI psychosis validates delusions, encouraging harmful actions. Deepfakes (e.g., DALL’s real-time manipulation) assault perceptions of reality. Screen exposure correlates with ADHD, anxiety, and brain alterations comparable to substance abuse. Musk’s Baby Grok acclimates children to AI dependency. Dopamine feedback loops mimic gambling, locking users into data extraction. NATO’s 2020 doctrine enables perception modification at scale, outsourcing thought to AI and diminishing critical thinking.
New Data Connects Smartphone Ownership at Age 12 to Obesity and Mental Health Concerns [B2]
A study published in Pediatrics investigated how early smartphone access influences depression, obesity, and sleep disruption in adolescents. The researchers set out to understand whether owning a smartphone at a younger age places a child on a different health trajectory than peers who don’t have these devices. They analyzed data from 10,588 children in early adolescence, an age defined by rapid emotional growth and heightened sensitivity to social feedback. The findings showed higher
odds of depression, obesity, and insufficient sleep among those who owned a smartphone at age 12 compared to those who did not. Another recent study, “Blocking mobile internet on smartphones improves sustained attention, mental health, and subjective well-being“, supports these findings.4
Lastly, an all-digital financial system, be it through CBDC or stable coins, threatens to make the ability to transact dependent on “good behaviour.” AI threatens the livelihoods of large swathes of the population, and UBI likely awaits those who willingly make the transition to the new slavery system. The scaffolding of a global biodigital gulag must be stopped before it is too late.
These events practice a new way of warfare, including EMP attacks, that could blackout North America and NATO Europe, and win World War III at the speed of light. Any nuclear weapon detonated in outer space, 30 kilometers or higher, will generate a high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) damaging all kinds of electronics, blacking-out electric grids and collapsing other life-sustaining critical infrastructures. No blast, thermal, fallout or effects other than HEMP are experienced in the atmosphere and on the ground. [Countries heavily reliant on 5G and related electronical infrastructure are especially vulnerable to HEMP attacks]
An EMP Attack on the U.S. Power Grids and Critical National Infrastructure [B2]
In a few billionths of a second, the initial EMP E1 waves induce massive voltages and currents intopowerlines throughout the … power grids. Any unshielded modern electronic device plugged into the grid instantly has its circuits fried; this includes all the computers and devices that control the operation of most U.S. critical national infrastructure – including the Emergency Power Systems and active Emergency Core Cooling Systems of at least 26 commercial nuclear reactors. Huge surges of electricity created by the E1 waves wreck the control panels of High-Voltage Substations and destroy the computers at power plants and power distribution centers. The combined effects of this catastrophic damage cause all … power grids to suddenly collapse. [life would end within a year for most people affected]
The 5G you can never leave Link