Freedom comes from respect for Human Rights, including your rights to Privacy and Freedom of Expression. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) was adopted without dissent by the UN General Assembly on December 10, 1948. The catalogue of rights set out in it is scarcely less than the sum of most of the important traditional political and civil rights of national constitutions and legal systems, including equality before the law; protection against arbitrary arrest; the right to a fair trial; freedom from ex post facto criminal laws; the right to own property; freedom of thought, conscience, and religion; freedom of opinion and expression; and freedom of peaceful assembly and association. Also enumerated are such economic, social, and cultural rights as the right to work, the right to form and join trade unions, the right to rest and leisure, the right toa standard of living adequate for health and well-being, and the right to education.1
The Government Culture of Death [B2]
What is a right? A right is an indefeasible claim against the whole world that originates in our humanity. Thus the right to live, to worship or not to worship, to think as you wish, to say what you think, to publish what you say, to associate or not to associate, to acquire property voluntarily, to defend your life and property, to travel and to be left alone are rights that are inherent in our nature. Rights are above the law. Like the color of our eyes, they are immune from the lawmaking power. To better understand the debate over the content and legitimate scope of human rights and the priorities claimed among them, it is useful to note the dominant schools of thought and action that have informed the human rights tradition since the beginning of modern times. Particularly helpful in this regard is the notion of three “generations” of human rights advanced by the French jurist Karel Vasak. Inspired by the three themes of the French Revolution, they are:
- the first generation, composed of civil and political rights (liberté) – addressing slavery, torture, expression, privacy, religion, property ownership and such.
- the second generation of economic, social, and cultural rights (égalité) – the right to work, a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of self and family; and education.
- the third generation of solidarity or group rights (fraternité) – including the global redistribution of power, wealth, and other important values or capabilities, the right to political, economic, social, and cultural self-determination and the right to economic and social development.
The three generations are understood to be cumulative, overlapping, and, it is important to emphasize, interdependent and interpenetrating. Importantly, rights expressed in all three generations are today under serious threat from elite groups [the cult]. Civil rights such as freedom of expression and privacy and economic rights such as an adequate standard of living [or life itself] are under serious threat. Claimed group rights, including the right to peace and the right to a clean and healthy environment, also suggest the corruption, impotence and/or inefficiency of the state in certain critical respects.
So who or what is diluting our human rights and freedoms?
Don Bell Reports: Proofs of a Conspiracy to Build a Total, Managed Global Society (1972) [C3]
“It is our intention to prove, out of their own mouths, that there is a conspiracy to build a new social, political and economic world order, and that the purpose of that conspiracy is to concentrate the wealth, the natural resources, the production, distribution, and sale of the world’s goods, in the hands of a favored oligarchy of international financiers and industrialists. We further intend to prove that there is an overall plan for the accomplishment of this purpose, a plan which is already being carried out, and a plan which calls for the building of a new social order on a global scale.”—Don Bell Reports, 8 September 1972
Bell also discussed the potential political and economic ramifications of a managed global society. He raised concerns about the erosion of national identities and the implications for democratic governance. Bell said that a global authority would prioritise efficiency and control over individual rights and freedoms.
US America loves its myth of being committed to justice for all, but in fact it is a society ruled and funded by a wealthy elite. This is not a government of, by and for the people! It is a ruthless oligarchy sanctioned by a majority of the people believing their vote counts. Money has always mattered, severely rigging the game in many ways toward an upper class (obscenely bribing candidates, corporate personhood power, gerrymandering, proprietary election software, hacking capacity to effect results, Jim Crow laws, voter suppression, etc.). The oligarchy approves “acceptable” candidates, while contrived rhetoric, propaganda, and our education system keep us faithful to our political system comprised of one party with two right wings, the winner ruling by tyranny of its majority. But the bottom line is that (s)elected representatives obey their large donors who thrive on war-making against vulnerable others.
The Secret Military History of the Internet [B2]
“The internet, from its inception, was created to be a tool of mass surveillance. It was developed first as a counterinsurgency tool for the Vietnam War and the rest of the Global South, but like many devices of foreign policy naturally it made its way back to U.S. soil. Yasha Levine, in his book “Surveillance Valley: The Secret Military History of the Internet“, chronicles the linear history of the internet’s birth at the Pentagon to its now ubiquitous use in all aspects of modern life. Its evolution spawned the massive private surveillance industry that lies behind tech giants like Google, Facebook and Amazon, which not only mine our private information for profit but share it with the government.”
Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars [F6]
“In conclusion, the objective of economic research, as conducted by the magnates of capital (banking) and the industries of commodities (goods) and services, is the establishment of an economy which is totally predictable and manipulatable. In order to achieve a totally predictable economy, the low-class elements of society must be brought under total control, i.e., must be housebroken, trained, and assigned a yoke and long-term social duties from a very early age, before they have an opportunity to question the propriety of the matter.“
[This article is either an example of character assassination at its “finest” (and true), or an example of the level of detail (the mountain of lies on a nugget of truth) gone into in order to fraudulently influence an audience (and false). It is an interesting read either way [maybe I need to get out more] and I believe it provides an important example of the importance of the admiralty scale and need for documentary and data evidence in making a judgement of reliability and accuracy]
This brings us to the state’s role in maintaining the current economic system. The state and its supportive ideology are crucial for maintaining capitalism’s economic base, with the state intervening through financial support and strategic market expansion. At the same time, ideological narratives shape public perception and legitimise actions by re-framing individual freedoms and exploiting crises – like COVID and Ukraine – to manage dissent and uphold elite power.
However, censoring views or locking people up for expressing even totally disagreeable opinions takes away human rights.
This report details the months long campaign by the Biden White House to coerce large companies, namely Meta (parent company of Facebook), Alphabet (parent company of YouTube), and Amazon, to censor books, videos, posts, and other content online. By the end of 2021, Facebook, YouTube, and Amazon changed their content moderation policies in ways that were directly responsive to criticism from the Biden Administration. We have moved beyond the days when the exceptions to free speech were limited to incitement, sedition, pornography, and blasphemy.2
Where Is the Bio-Fascist State Headed? [B2]
In [current and] proposed laws we see the features I’ve sketched in previous posts on the Biosecurity Surveillance Regime unfolding around us: the welding of public health, digital technologies, and the police powers of the state into an invasive model of surveillance and control.
Also refer How Carnegie’s Blood Money Bought British Law: The Online Safety Act Exposed [F2]
“Carnegie UK Trust did not just influence the Online Safety Act 2023. They wrote it. This is not interpretation. This is their own admission.” This well written and referenced article exposes Regulatory capture: “what happens when regulatory agencies or Parliament start doing what powerful private interests want, instead of acting for the public.”
Ideological reconfiguration aligns with technological transformation. We all love technology and the possibilities for making our lives better. But there should always be a conversation about trade-offs, and that conversation never seems to happen. This isn’t just about privacy or data security. It’s about the systematic severance of human consciousness from its biological foundation – and the global hi-tech infrastructure being constructed to ensure that that separation becomes permanent.
It’s Getting Harder And Harder To Preserve Our Mental Sovereignty [B2]
Our rulers see AI as an opportunity to recapture the degree of social control that was shaken by the arrival of widespread internet access — a loss of information hegemony we’ve seen oligarchs and empire managers openly complaining about with regard to how social media has spread public dissent on issues like Israel and Palestine. Journalist Whitney Webb has flagged the fact that Google plutocrat Eric Schmidt co-authored a book with war criminal Henry Kissinger which envisions a future where the public becomes increasingly dependent on artificial intelligence to do our thinking and creative expression for us, allowing our consciousness to become further and further intertwined with these oligarch-owned technologies.
“The Kissinger/Eric Schmidt book on AI basically states that the real promise of AI, from their perspective, is as a tool of perception manipulation — that eventually people will not be able to interpret or perceive reality without the help of an AI via cognitive diminishment and learned helplessness,” Webb warns.
Once we’ve outsourced our cognitive sovereignty to AI, our minds have been captured by the owners of the machines.
Hi-Tech Holocaust: How Microsoft Aids The Gaza Genocide [C3]
MintPress has detailed the deep collaboration between the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) and Amazon, Google, TikTok, Apple, Palantir, and Oracle, but Microsoft’s relationship with the government and armed forces of Israel is potentially the closest, leading then-CEO Steve Ballmer to state that “Microsoft is as much an Israeli company as an American company.”
Microsoft Azure’s cloud-based storage platform allowed Israel to overcome targeting bottlenecks, using all manner of data to research and identify individuals for assassination, which led to the killing of tens of thousands of people during the first weeks of its post-October 7 onslaught. Of course, the vast majority of the deaths have been civilians – around 70% were women and children. But Israeli officials can also go back after the fact and scour their digital dragnet to justify any killing, finding connections or any other incriminating evidence. A senior Israeli military officer described the cloud technology as “a weapon in every sense of the word.”
The Private Companies Quietly Building a Police State [B3]
From Palantir’s data fusion to Clearview’s face scraping and Flock’s license-plate dragnets, a handful of private vendors now underpin everyday policing—and ICE’s deportation machine. Sold as “public safety,” these tools supercharge surveillance, stitch together vast personal data, and evade democratic oversight. This post provides an overview of some of the most impactful and concerning police surveillance technology currently deployed, including the most dangerous companies building these tools for law enforcement. Many of these systems are already in place, but as they continue to grow in scale, it is imperative that the public is informed to pressure the government to prioritize and demand our rights and safety over corporate interests to surveil and punish.
The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) and advanced automation technologies—such as robotics, driverless vehicles, 3D printing, drone technology and even ‘farmerless farms’—reshapes the traditional mass labour force that underpins capitalist economic activity: it is being profoundly transformed and significantly reduced. Looking ahead, as economic activity is restructured through these technologies, the entire social infrastructure built to reproduce labour—mass education, welfare, healthcare—will be rendered increasingly unnecessary because fewer workers are needed to sustain production and services. This transformation alters labour’s classical role as a seller of labour power to capital, fundamentally changing the dynamics of the labour-capital relationship.
The UK government is designing / installing a Digital Identity Panopticon [B2]
The UK government’s official position is to use AI as the “eyes of the state” and to set its gaze firmly “on you at all times.” This is the openly stated purpose of the official UK digital identity Panopticon. As things stand, the biometric data – facial recognition images – of 45 million British passport holders and, overlapping that number, 55 million drivers, are set to form the biometric authentication tokens that will single out our individual digital identities within the envisaged digital identity data lakes. AI can then use our identity token to isolate our individual behavioural patterns, detect anomalies, and predict whatever the state deems to be a risk associated with our behaviour. The real-time speed of AI pattern recognition enables the constant monitoring of our activity. The state can then deploy AI to execute predetermined conditional smart contracts to instantly restrict or withhold our access to goods and services – or worse.
What does this attack on our human rights and freedoms mean for the 99%?
The question is: if labour is defined in terms of its relation to capital and is the condition for the existence of the working class, why bother with maintaining or reproducing labour? In this context of social erosion, neoliberalism has already weakened trade unions, suppressed wages and increased inequality. And now the message is: get used to being poor or on the scrapheap, and dissent will not be tolerated. How will they do this?
How the West Was Won: Counterinsurgency, PSYOPS and the Military Origins of the Internet [C2]
Despite the government, apparently, abandoning their gambit for total information awareness over ordinary Americans, the core of the [DARPA] project survived. I draw your attention to Palantir, the spooky data analytics firm founded by Facebook’s board member, Peter Thiel. Portrayed as science fiction in the film Minority Report, Palantir’s predictive policing analytics have been deployed extensively against insurgents in Iraq and by police departments in the US. The CIA would join the FBI, DoD and NSA in becoming a Palantir customer in 2005, later acquiring an equity stake in the firm through their venture capital arm, In-Q-Tel. At the time of his first meetings with Facebook, Theil had been working on resurrecting several controversial DARPA programs.
Also refer UK Govt Signs Billion Dollar AI Military Deal with Palantir [B2]
The Great Dispossession Part 3 [B3]
Under the regulatory regime in place, financial collapse today means that money will be drained from the economy and be concentrated along with all wealth in a few hands. A modern-day economy cannot function without money and without companies that serve as distributors of food, goods, and services. Webb notes that it is a perfect opportunity for central banks to introduce Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) with which they have been experimenting. The provision of CBDC to the population would provide a money supply and income to a population in chaos and restore order to a grateful population. But it would also give total control to rulers.
Webb quotes Augustin Carstens, general manager of the Bank for International Settlements who says that the key difference between present day currency and Central Bank Digital Currency is that with CBDC the central bank will know how each person uses their allotment of digital currency which gives the central bank absolute control over you via the capability to regulate your purchases, to turn off disapproved purchases, to discipline dissenters. You will be supplied with the means of life as long as you have a good social credit score, which means that you are a non-dissenter of official narratives. In other words, a slave.
The Modern Slave [B2]
Most people hear ‘modern slavery’ and picture trafficking victims or sweatshop workers—suffering that’s clearly visible, obviously wrong, and comfortably distant from their daily lives. What if the most effective slavery in history isn’t hidden—but public, celebrated, and defended by the very people it enslaves? This isn’t about personal hardship or material deprivation. Many people living under this system … enjoy comforts that would have amazed historical royalty.
The sophistication of modern control lies precisely in maintaining compliance through comfort rather than suffering. A golden cage is still a cage, and a comfortable slave is still a slave. Historical slaves at least knew they were enslaved. The violence was visible, the coercion obvious, the enemy identifiable. Today’s slaves are convinced they’re consumers.
The Technological Leash Tightens: The convergence is accelerating through coordinated infrastructure:
- Biological Integration: Neural interfaces turn your cells into network nodes
- Identity Capture: Biometric databases make anonymous existence impossible
- Data Processing: Massive server farms process every biometric signature in real-time
- Interface Elimination: ‘Contextually aware’ devices remove conscious choice friction
- Cognitive Control: AI systems shape how you think about questions themselves
- Economic Dependency: Digital income tied to compliance monitoring
The genius is making compliance feel voluntary while making resistance practically impossible.
Everything is Watching: A Field Guide to Everyday Surveillance Tech [B2]
Why Do People Keep Saying Yes to Surveillance? Most … monitoring comes paired with features people do actually want. They buy smart doorbells for delivery alerts, accept TV recommendations and use streaming services for their favourite shows, use voice commands to stay organised, and connect to their cars for live traffic updates and remote start capabilities. These are each small conveniences that are traded for a high premium: their privacy. The result is a persistent, ever-growing trail of where you live, when you leave, where you go, what you watch, who is at your door or in your car, and how you make decisions. That trail generates billions of dollars for data brokers, ad networks, and pricing engines – and most people don’t even know it’s happening.
You’re never legally mandated to participate. You’re just architecturally excluded from normal life if you don’t. The control isn’t in making you comply — it’s in making non-compliance functionally impossible while maintaining the fiction of choice. Test what happens when you question fundamental premises.
- Ask why we needed lockdowns when Sweden didn’t.
- Ask why college costs rose 1000% without quality improvement.
- Ask why we can’t audit the Federal Reserve.
- Ask why Israel gets unconditional support.
- Ask why certain vaccines can’t be questioned.
- Ask why some groups’ disparities matter and others don’t.
- Ask why your currency lost 96% of its value.
- Ask why cancer rates keep rising despite ‘progress’.
Don’t argue answers — just note what happens when you ask.
You’re not engaged with evidence. You’re categorised: ‘conspiracy theorist’, ‘science denier’, ‘extremist’, ‘racist’, ‘anti-semite’, ‘dangerous’, ‘fringe’, ‘discredited’, ‘debunked’. The response isn’t argument but diagnosis. You don’t have wrong opinions — you have a mental defect. You don’t need debate — you need treatment, deplatforming, deprogramming. The questions themselves become evidence of corruption: only a bad person would ask that. Only someone captured by ‘disinformation’ would think that. Only an extremist would notice that pattern. The circularity is perfect: questioning the system proves you’re the kind of person whose questions shouldn’t be taken seriously. This is the hallmark of ideological control: when asking questions becomes proof of pathology. When noticing patterns becomes dangerous. When requesting evidence becomes antisocial. When doubt itself is transformed from a virtue into a vice.
And for an example of what happens to those that do resist, refer Professor Norman Fenton: To free society from Cultural Marxism, destroy the DEI narrative [C3]
- Backlash: Labels and Professional Toll
- Morally Wrong Vaccine Mandates
- Silenced by Far-Left Academia
- DEI is Class Control in Disguise
- MHRA is An Enabler, Not A Regulator
- BBC: Climate Lies for the Greater Good
- AI is a Censorship Tool
[AI will also lead to energy / water shortages. Nearly 2 million liters of water are needed to produce a ton of lithium]3 4
Inverting Justice: Lawfare Across the Globe [C3]
Individuals representing a variety of professions challenging the corrupted globalist systems being established worldwide have been targeted for unjustified, excessive and cruel punishment. They play an important role as grim warning to anyone contemplating stepping out of line. An increasing number of whistleblowers and human rights advocates around the world are learning first-hand the repercussions of speaking out to defend humanity. We feature several of the most renowned cases in this article, to raise awareness of the crimes taking place. This will ultimately have an impact on us all as our previously functional systems are swallowed by totalitarian rule. Also refer The Vindication and Brutal Punishment of Dr. Reiner Fuellmich [C3].
Covid, for example, is just one compliance tool.
How the West Was Won: Counterinsurgency, PSYOPS and the Military Origins of the Internet [C2]
The covid pandemic was greatly assisted by the flawed doomsday modelling of epidemiologists; it happened across the corporate media, and it happened on social media platforms like Facebook. It wasn’t so much a pandemic, but the social contagion experiment playing out in real time. But there was more than just social media manipulating our emotional states; fear, shame, and scapegoating was rife throughout as the British government deployed behavioural economics to, essentially, nudge the public towards compliance. Launched under David Cameron’s Government, the Behavioural Insights Team (BIT) – affectionately known as the Nudge Unit – are a team of crack psychologists and career civil servants tasked with positively influencing appropriate behaviour with tiny changes. But according to whose measure of appropriate behaviour, exactly?
A clue lies in the fact that BIT was directed by Sir Mark Sedwill during the first lockdown. He’s one of Britain’s most senior national security advisors with links to M15 and MI6… an intelligence operative ruling by psychological manipulation. We are led to believe that in a democracy, government is an agency of the people and parliament is given force of law by the will of the people. Over time, however, the intelligence state (has) lost touch with reality, as the focus of its (earlier) “counterinsurgency” programs (has) shifted from foreign to domestic populations, from national security risks to ordinary citizens. Particularly in the wake of 9/11, when the NSA and its British counterpart, GCHQ, began mapping out the Internet. Before anti-vaxxers and conspiracy theorists, you had civil rights and anti-war activists. The ideology guiding dissent may have changed, but the military tactics used to counter it remain the same.
Scientists Sound Alarm Over ‘Magnetic Nanoparticles’ in Covid ‘Vaccines’ [B2]
The experts are raising alarms about a possibility that Covid mRNA “vaccines” may enable brain-targeted “mind-control” interfaces. This review argues that magnetic elements found in the “vaccines” could be part of a biotechnological delivery method called “magnetofection,” a concept linked to DARPA’s research into mind-control interfaces.
Warning: The mRNA “Vaccines” Are Destroying Minds [B2]
These experimental [Covid vaccine] injections are blinding human intelligence, stripping people of their ability to think critically, resist manipulation, and even say no. The physical toll—myocarditis, strokes, sudden deaths in athletes—is horrifying, but the true nightmare runs deeper. Billions of injected individuals are losing their cognitive faculties.
Canada Advances Plan to ‘Vaccinate” Public with Bill Gates-Funded Covid mRNA Aerosols [F2]
The Canadian government is ramping up testing for a disturbing new Covid mRNA “AeroVax.” The new AeroVax seeks to overcome “vaccine hesitancy” by using aerosols to “vaccinate” the general public. Unlike traditional “vaccines” that are deployed using injections, the new AeroVax is an atomized spray that is inhaled. The new “vaccines” are sprayed in aerosol form and breathed in by recipients. The AeroVax was developed by researchers at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation–funded McMaster University in Canada. According to researchers, the Canadian government’s Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) has now invested $8 million in taxpayer funding into the AeroVax project as scientists prepare for the next round of clinical tests. … If the AeroVax were deployed atmospherically, it could “vaccinate” entire towns and cities at once, bypassing individual consent. Populations could be “vaccinated” without their knowledge under such a scheme. These concerns have been previously raised by multiple experts amid the ongoing push to develop inhaled “vaccines.” [who needs mandates? or bodily integrity?]
Evidence for aerosol transmission of viruses is well-established [?] and is also available for SARS-CoV-2. While aerosols have not been definitively proved to carry SARS-CoV-2 in the outside air, neither has this been ruled out. One study, across four laboratories, demonstrated that intact whole virus capable of causing infection in cells remained at similar levels for the duration of a 16-hour experiment in aerosols in the air. A different type of coronavirus, causing infection in pigs at a farm, was shown to spread through the air over 10 miles away and still be capable of causing infection.5 [and the difference is?]
Medical whistleblower, author, and former medical coder Zowe Smith describes for AM Wake Up how the COVID-19 registry—used to keep track of those who [supposedly] contracted COVID [whatever that is] as well as the contacts of those who contracted COVID—has been privatized. Specifically, privatized by Datavant, which is a health information “AI ecosystem” company working with BGI in China. BGI, Smith notes, is what became of the Human Genome Project in China. Smith notes this private database housed by Datavant (assembled from the COVID registry data) is shared with 500 other private companies.
Fact-Checking the Jeffrey Epstein Case and Many Other Conspiracy Theories [B2]
… “an example of global censorship on an issue of major significance. There is much more information on the actual event available in the linked references. The importance of Freedom of Speech is demonstrated by the millions killed and injured, trillions of dollars spent, countries destroyed and our global ‘Right to Privacy’ forsaken (invasive searches at airports, domestic electronic surveillance, etc.) in the ‘Global War on Terror” directly as a result of 9/11.”
The end game, drain the brain
An Introduction to Fifth Generation Warfare [C3]
We at Radio Research have evolved the definition, stating that ‘Fifth Generation Warfare’ is defined by data-driven, non-kinetic military action designed to take advantage of existing cognitive biases and create new cognitive biases. Or as Abbott and Rees/Herring describe, “the deliberate manipulation of an observer’s context in order to achieve a desired outcome.” Fifth-generation warfare technologies have advanced to the point that when applied correctly, their very use has been concealed. As we will describe further below in the Attribution Problem, in many cases simply understanding who is behind a 5GW attack is impossible.
This means that a Fifth Generation Warfare conflict can be fought and won without a single bullet being fired, or even most of the population knowing that a war is taking place. [as in the war on humanity that is taking place today]
Among the technologies and techniques often associated with 5GW are the following:
- Misinformation (Data Driven) – deepfakes
- Cyberattacks – honeypots
- Social media manipulation (Data Driven)
- Decentralized and highly non attributable psychological warfare (memes, fake news)
- Mass surveillance [link to paid site]
High tech is watching you [B2]
The continuing advances of the digital revolution can be dazzling. But Shoshana Zuboff , professor emerita at Harvard Business School, warns that their lights, bells, and whistles have made us blind and deaf to the ways high-tech giants exploit our personal data for their own ends. In her new book, “The Age of Surveillance Capitalism,” Zuboff offers a disturbing picture of how Silicon Valley and other corporations are mining users’ information to predict and shape their behavior. The Gazette recently interviewed Zuboff about her belief that surveillance capitalism, a term she coined in 2014, is undermining personal autonomy and eroding democracy.
Nearly One Million UK Toddlers Hooked on Social Media [B3]
… the alarming trend is particularly worrying because it exposes that the platforms are working exactly as they are designed – they want to divert as much attention to their apps, and keep newcomers online regardless of age. So, rather than individual parents suddenly becoming reckless, the numbers indicate that the engagement-optimised platforms are actually trying to encourage this kind of usage. Over 800,000 pre-schoolers are on social media. 90% of kids own a phone by age 11. These numbers are no longer outliers based on irresponsible parenting – they are generational trends transcending all classes, upbringings and social circumstances.
[The cult benefits both ways, as always. They own the profitable content providers, and then use public concern to bring in new legislation that targets users, further reducing human rights such as Privacy and Freedom of Expression. For example, as of 10 December 2025, Australia will have banned under-16s from accessing social media platforms. Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, X/Twitter, YouTube, Reddit, Discord, and Threads must block new sign-ups, remove any existing under-16 accounts, and require real age verification. Fines could stack up to $50 million for any platforms found to be non-compliant with the new rules. The end of Privacy, but for a “good cause”.]
We need to realise that there is a global conspiracy to collect, centralise and control our personal data. Not at the national level but at the supranational level. Once they have control over our data and all our activities are conducted or recorded online, they have control over every aspect of our lives, first regionally and then progressing to globally. First at the European Union level, and then progressing to the United Nations level. The involvement of private corporations and non-governmental organisations is part of the plan. It is the UN-WEF public-private partnership model for global governance under a One World Government.
This conspiracy is supported around the world by governments enacting legislation to protect children, etc., based on targeted research and desirable solutions. This forces people to provide personal information in order to retain their internet access, and installs a global compliance system using internet providers as regulators.
Neoliberalism’s Playbook: Control, Crisis and Compliance. Endgame Logic of Late Capitalism [C3]
To push back against any dissent, ordinary people are being told that they must sacrifice personal liberty in order to protect public health, societal security or the climate. Unlike in the old normal of consumer-oriented neoliberalism, an ideological shift is occurring whereby personal freedoms are increasingly depicted as being dangerous because they run counter to the collective good. [Don’t be a ‘granny killer’] [For a good review of this, see This is the moment the internet changed forever.
For just two examples of where the loss of liberty and freedom of speech may lead, out of many thousands that are known, refer Tunisian Man Pardoned After Death Sentence for Criticizing President Online and Mexico Bill Proposes Prison for AI Memes Mocking Public Figures [Both F3]
This is just part of it. Consider research into mind control.
On 4 June 2025, Oracle Films released its documentary ‘The Agenda: Their Vision – Your Future’ which examines the digital prison which awaits us if we do not push back right now. … the centerpiece to the control of us – the control over our activities, both online and offline, our money, our food, our health, etc – is man-made climate change and with it, the race to Net Zero. And as Jabbi rightly pointed out, they use inverted language. The scare-mongering rhetoric surrounding “global warming” is a psychological ruse in an attempt to get the public to comply with the United Nations “sustainability” goals. To demonstrate that the narrative that human activities are causing a climate crisis is a ruse, we turn to a recent interview with Dr. Judith Curry.
On 20 August 2025, Freedom Research published an interview Hannes Sarv conducted with Dr. Curry. While warfare has a long history of psychological operations and propaganda, conflict going online has accelerated psychological warfare, reducing the feedback loops to milliseconds. Facebook product teams have a word for this: “Dopamine Loops”. [Beware. Be aware] Attempt to understand any pre-existing cultural biases you may have. 5GW attacks decision-making ability using biases as cognitive tools of influence. What memes do you like or political groups you do prefer, what are your fetishes and dislikes? What skeletons do you have in ‘the closet’? How do you use social media? How’s your relationship going with a loved one? All of this data is being harvested from your internet history and the spatial web and will be used against you in a world of Fifth Gen targeted warfare. (Most of this data is commercially available on the grey market).
Save Human Beings From the Abuse of Neurotechnologies [C3]
In November 2000, the Russian State Duma Committee for Security recommended to the Russian State Duma to enact the law prohibiting the use of electromagnetic weapons on Russian territory. It argued:
“The achievements of contemporary science and technology made possible the development of informational and psychophysiological technologies which allow for the creation of means and methods of secret, remote influence on the psyche and physiology of a person or of a group of people. There exists a wide spectrum of means enabling guaranteed change of the way of thinking of a human being, programming of his behavior, interfering with the adequacy of his reactions or artificially bringing about symptoms of dependency… Phone lines, heating and sewer pipes, TVs, fire signalization can be used as transmitting antennas.”
MAHA, Wearables and the War for Embodied Consciousness [B2]
The promise of “health optimization” masks something far more profound: the transformation of human beings from conscious biological entities into managed
streams. When your wearable becomes the mediator between you and your own physical experience, you’ve lost something fundamental about what it means to inhabit a human body.
The right to privacy—once a cornerstone of American liberty—is crumbling under the weight of algorithmic authoritarianism. What began as voluntary health tracking has morphed into a full-scale assault on bodily autonomy, with government and corporate overlords poised to seize control of our most intimate biological data.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Trump’s Secretary of Health and Human Services, is championing a future where every American wears biometric surveillance devices—marketed as “wellness tools.” But in reality these wearable will function as digital shackles. The fluctuation of individual health data on a momentary basis will be used to exploit human insecurities, fears, and worries. Compliance with medications, dosages, vaccine passports will be calculated to the smallest detail and be tied to your participation in society, insurance pricing, and whether or not you receive medical care in the end. Worse, this is the final frontier in a decades-long campaign to eradicate personal freedom and normalize a surveillance-industrial complex that profits from our obedience and exploits every aspect of our bodily functions.
For years, Aman Jabbi, a Silicon Valley technology veteran, has been warning about the creation of a “digital prison” through the integration of advanced surveillance technologies – including facial recognition, artificial intelligence and a network of surveillance devices – which will enable continuous monitoring and individual identification. He argues that the widespread use of facial recognition, combined with artificial intelligence and a network of surveillance devices – potentially numbering in the tens of billions – is enabling a system of continuous monitoring and individual identification. He links this development to broader concepts such as the social credit system, digital real estate, the metaverse and the World Economic Forum’s “Fourth Industrial Revolution,” suggesting these technologies are part of a coordinated effort to establish a fully integrated command and control system. Jabbi said:
“Air monitoring is really about limiting mobility and no car ownership. Surveillance control via LED grid is why the smart lighting is there. Water management is about water rationing. Noise pollution is about speech surveillance. Traffic monitoring is about limiting mobility. And then, of course, energy conservation is all about rationing heat, electricity and gasoline,”
About geofencing: “think of it as an invisible fence around you where you cannot go beyond a certain point; and that’ll be related to your face recognition, digital identity and access control. Our world has been turned into a digital panopticon. That means you can be monitored, analysed, managed and monetised.”
Everything is Watching: A Field Guide to Everyday Surveillance Tech [B2]
Why Do People Keep Saying Yes to Surveillance? Most of this monitoring comes paired with features people do actually want. They buy smart doorbells for delivery alerts, accept TV recommendations and use streaming services for their favourite shows, use voice commands to stay organised, and connect to their cars for live traffic updates and remote start capabilities. These are each small conveniences that are traded for a high premium: their privacy. The result is a persistent, ever-growing trail of where you live, when you leave, where you go, what you watch, who is at your door or in your car, and how you make decisions. That trail generates billions of dollars for data brokers, ad networks, and pricing engines – and most people don’t even know it’s happening.
Privately link and say hello NSA
- https://www.britannica.com/topic/human-rights/The-UN-Commission-on-Human-Rights-1946-2006-and-the-UN-Human-Rights-Council. ↩︎
- https://citizenwatchreport.com/irish-comedy-writer-graham-linehan-arrested-at-heathrow-airport-by-five-armed-police-officers-for-three-offensive-x-posts/ ↩︎
- Data centers are consuming the grid, Residential electricity costs are near a record high, and decaying infrastructure threatens blackouts. ↩︎
- https://lonewolves.info/?p=292 ↩︎
- Too Many Dead – An Inquiry into Australia’s Excess Mortality – Copyright © Australian Medical Professionals Society ↩︎