Reducing global population has been a consistent goal of the ruling class for centuries. While many support the abstract idea of population control, no one wants to volunteer to be the ones who are culled. The business of population control has hence been a very messy subject. When the COVID vaccine program began, I—and likely many others—suspected the COVID vaccines would have an “unexpected” side effect of reducing fertility. Early in their development, Mike Yeadon (and others) at great personal risk publicly warned regulators of a clear fertility danger inherent to the vaccine (found in section IX of their petition).
Subsequent regulatory document leaks from the European FDA revealed Pfizer exempted themselves from testing the key areas of concern (infertility, autoimmunity and cancer) in animals. This highly unusual move further suggested serious problems existed in these three areas (as you can’t find something if you don’t test for it). Despite repeated denials, signs of each of these key complications from the vaccine have now emerged. While I do not have every piece of the puzzle—there are likely many “population control initiatives” I’ve never heard of—I know enough to paint a clear picture of this dirty business. The first half of this two-part article will lay out the historical precedent of using any means necessary to reduce the population, while the second part will examine how this is attempted with vaccinations.
In 1798, Rev. Thomas R Malthus published the influential work An Essay on the Principle of Population, which argued that human populations tend to increase at a geometrical (exponential) rate, but the means of subsistence (food) grows at only an arithmetic (linear) rate. “The power of population is indefinitely greater than the power of the earth to produce subsistence for man,” according to Malthus, who therefore believed the standard of living of the masses could not be improved without the checks of war, famine, or disease. In their absence, population would increase by a geometric rate and lead to a catastrophic “Malthusian” food supply collapse. While there are numerous errors in his theory, Malthus was appointed to multiple important positions, and his ideas appear to have gradually become a prevailing conviction among members of the ruling classes in the 19th century. These ideas also influenced other key figures, such as Charles Darwin as he created his theory of evolution and natural selection.
Numerous groups were founded over the decades, which emphasized birth control and increasing mortality of the poor. These groups included Dr. George Drysdale’s Elements of Social Science in 1854, the Malthusian League in 1877, and Margret Sanger’s National Birth Control League in 1915, which became the Planned Parenthood Federation of America in 1942. Initially these groups were domestic, but gradually they became global where they tied international aid and development to population control measures. The Malthusian and Darwinian ideals gradually gave birth to Social Darwinism and Eugenics, which were widely adopted by the ruling elite. Social Darwinism argued that class divisions were the will of nature and that this form of natural selection, rather than being evil, was necessary. The most extreme version of this ideology, eugenics, appears to have arisen from two key factors:
- The tribal nature of human beings and the tendency to view all other tribes as inferior (the ruling class felt this way towards the poor).
- The advances of society were making it possible for many of the weaker members of society, who previously would have died off, to survive long enough to reproduce and, over time, significantly weaken the gene pool.
Eugenics in turn advocated preventing those who were less “fit” from breeding. This has been responsible for horror upon horror since its inception, and it provided the theoretical foundation for why, among other things, the Nazis forcibly sterilized the mentally ill. In many cases, programs with more immediate results were also implemented. While most are aware of the millions executed by Hitler, other dictators such as Pol-Pot, Joseph Stalin, and Mao Zedong arguably did even worse. A lead researcher in this field coined the term “democide” and estimates these governments executed approximately 150 million people in the previous century. When the Nazis eventually were tried at Nuremberg for their crimes against humanity, few know that that many cited the fact similar actions were first conducted by the “Great United States” in their defense.
While books could be written on the horrors of eugenics, the key point to remember is that the discipline never disappeared and has enjoyed sustained support from the upper class. Did you know that the creators of the dangerous AstraZeneca COVID vaccine—which has been promoted as the vaccine of choice for the third world—have extensive ties to major eugenics organizations? I wish I was making this up. For those interested in medicine’s monopolization of the pregnancy process and the tragic harm it creates, The Business of Being Born (online) and Robert S. Mendelsohn’s writings on the subject are two of the best items I’ve found on the subject.
National Security Study Memorandum 200 is the most well-known authentic government document advancing a systematic population control agenda. Written in 1974 by Kissinger during Nixon’s presidency (and unclassified decades later), it identified third world population growth as a critical national security issue for the United States and outlined a variety of steps to combat it. Population control has also been discussed within the public media. The 9/4/94 Associated Press article “Compromise near on Population Control Plan” stated: “On the eve of the opening of the United Nations Population Conference in Cairo, a US official said that a compromise on the sensitive issues of abortion and birth control was “very close.”…During three preparatory conferences, delegates from 170 countries agreed on more than 90% of the plan for controlling population.”
Mechanisms of Population Control
As best as I can tell, population control measures typically follow one of three approaches:
1. Create social changes that discourage having children.
2. Introduce an environmental factor that decreases male testosterone and sperm viability.
3. Directly sterilize (or give birth control to) women of childbearing age.
it is almost universally agreed within the scientific literature that there has been a massive, sustained decline in male testosterone levels over the decades (a male’s testosterone levels goes hand in hand with his health and fertility). This decline directly affects male (and to a lesser extent female) health, and numerous integrative physicians have found rectifying it creates profound benefits in a large percentage of their patients.
A common means of controlling animal populations is to universally introduce an agent which decreases male fertility (as these tend to be easier to distribute on a large-scale basis than agents which target female reproduction). In addition, a common method of controlling animal behavior is to neuter males, as this reduces their aggression and “disobedience to authority.” Many of the factors causing this decline appear to have been deliberately placed in the environment. The most influential are xenoestrogens, artificial chemicals that mimic the characteristics of estrogen and feminize organisms. For those interested, the eight-hour audiobook, Estrogeneration: How Estrogenics Are Making You Fat, Sick, and Infertile provides an excellent summary of the topic.
Some of the most common xenoestrogens in addition to atrazine (and some other herbicides) include, Soy (excluding the rare exception where it is fermented like in Miso or Natto), Bisphenol A and S found in many plastics, Phalates (also found in many plastics, Parabens (these are uses for fragrances in many cosmetic products) and DDT and PCBs – highly dangerous mutagenic chemicals. Despite their known toxicity (Monsanto, the initial PCB producer, saw within three years 23 of their 24 researchers develop disfigured faces) it took decades, and in some cases almost a century of activism, to remove them from the market. While it is appreciated that increasing estrogen levels will directly feminize males, it is less appreciated that there are estrogen receptors in the brain that reduce testosterone levels when stimulated. Clomifene, a drug designed for inducing ovulation blocks this anti-testosterone receptor. Direct testosterone administration can be used for male health, however, many physicians also find significant benefit from using clomifene, as it alone can raise testosterone, and in many cases treat male infertility. This (and many pieces of evidence) suggest xenoestrogens play a key role in the male decline of testosterone.
One of the largest influences on testicular function is microwave radiation (emitted by cell phones and Wi-Fi enabled devices). Brain matter, the heart, and the testicles are the most susceptible tissues in the body to this microwave radiation (for those curious, there is actually a lot of research proving this). Microwave field strength (per the inverse square law) exponentially decreases from its source, and a frequently successful approach for treating male infertility is to avoid carrying a phone in the pocket or using a laptop near the lap. While I am not familiar with the effects of this radiation on the ovaries, it has been shown that microwave field strength increases within the uterus rather than decreases as would be expected (the uterus is a fascinating organ) and that some degree of correlation between birth defects and prenatal EMF exposure exists.
Many other factors also influence testosterone levels and fertility. Two of the more interesting examples are metformin and the widely used sugar replacement stevia. To tie this all together, Niels E. Skakkebæk, MD PhD, an expert in testicular cancer, has shown through Denmark’s national cancer registry (maintained since 1943) that the rate of testicular cancer more than tripled from 1943 to 1993 and continues to grow since that time. At the same time, he also found sperm density fell from 113 million per milliliter in 1940 to 66 million per milliliter in 1990 and that the volume of sperm has dropped an average of 19%.
While the Nazis, who forcefully sterilized or executed millions they deemed unfit to breed, are history’s most notorious offenders, many sterilization campaigns have been forcibly conducted by governments around the world against poor women of color. One of the best-known examples occurred in the United States from the 1960s to the 1970s. There, the Indian Health Services, through force and deceit, sterilized between 25% to 40% of the female native American population via tubal ligations and hysterectomies, resulting in a halving of their birth rate. Other examples include:
- 40,000 women that were sterilized in Colombia between 1963-65 by Rockefeller-funded programs.
- A million women were sterilized in Brazil between 1965-1971.
- A U.S.-imposed population control program administered by the Peace Corps in Bolivia sterilized Quechua Indian women without their knowledge or consent.
From a population management perspective, a long-lasting injectable birth control option is the only feasible option. One of the best candidates for that approach is the injectable Depo-Provera, one of the more harmful birth control options that has seriously affected the health of many women I know. Depo-Provera, as you would guess, is regularly used by international organizations in third-world countries. Going as far back as almost 50 years ago, in 1979, USAID through the International Planned Parenthood Federation supplied Depo-Provera to 378, 000 women in Mexico, Sri Lanka. and Bangladesh in experimental research projects. Widespread administration of Depo-Provera by these organizations continues to this day (with the additional involvement of more modern organizations such as the Gates Foundation who continue the tradition relentlessly distributing it to vulnerable women). A push was made to distribute Depo-Provera far and wide, as you might expect, this was often done in an unethical manner where the recipients often had little knowledge of what was being done to them.
When desperate situations arise, these too are frequently taken advantage of by international organizations to implement population control campaigns. Receiving Depo-Provera or a sterilization procedure is often made a requirement for receiving international aid. In Bangladesh, an area where individuals frequently starved to death, this was the condition for receiving food. In Thai refugee camps for Cambodians fleeing the collapse of the Khmer Rouge, refugees were often required to receive Depo-Provera to access necessities for survival, while male refugees were paid to recruit as many refugees as possible for injection. Each of these narratives is important to consider as we look at the immoral way the COVID-19 vaccines have been distributed and mandated. These ideas are recurring themes throughout history, and they have all repeatedly shown themselves during the current vaccination campaign. Additionally, if you wish to know more on the subject for forced sterilization campaigns by the WHO, I would highly recommend reading Chapter 10 of The Real Anthony Fauci.
The Complete History of Depopulation Vaccines
In recent times, the targeted demographic appears to have been expanded to include most of the Western population. Because of this, groups that were not typically targeted for population reduction in the past now are. We are all the prey now.
Given that vaccines are unconditionally trusted by most people and are very easy to administer, if a vaccination could produce sterilization or at least reduce fertility from a single injection, it would provide a technological solution to a dilemma the ruling class has faced for over a century. The only possible superior alternative I can think of would be a highly contagious respiratory virus (or “self-spreading vaccine”) that impaired future fertility without otherwise causing too much damage (and to some extent has been observed in men after COVID-19). Due to the long history of population control measures and the ruling class’s increasing need to develop an effective tool for it, I suspected the COVID vaccines would eventually be found to reduce fertility. After all, this was a once in a lifetime opportunity I could not see the eugenicists would let themselves miss.
Once the vaccine emerged on the market, it was discovered that one of the most common effects was severe disturbances and alterations to women’s menstrual cycles. When biodistribution studies of the lipid nanoparticle (containing the vaccine mRNA) became available for review they showed they concentrated in the ovaries. This is very unusual and raises the possibility that the lipid nanoparticle may have been designed for this purpose. Since the ovaries regulate the menstrual cycle, this suggested that menstrual changes were a result of the vaccine creating some type of disturbance in the ovaries. This also made me worry that some type of permanent change was being created in the eggs with an ensuing effect that would take decades to show up (many potential health issues come to mind).
My initial hypothesis during the COVID rollout was that the mRNA vaccines would be pushed through and everything else would be thrown under the bus (which is largely what happened) due to the trillions of dollars to be made from opening up the mRNA market. Since the mRNA products were too unsafe to give to humans outside of the unprecedented “emergency” situation created through unnecessary lockdowns, commercial interests dictated that this window would be used to the maximum extent possible.
I also had two alternative hypothesizes. The first was that mRNA vaccines were going to be used as some type of Malthusian tool to reduce the population. The second was that the Chinese military had designed the Sars-CoV-2 so that the most likely vaccine candidate, a vector that mass produced spike proteins, would be the actual weapon and would end up being deployed in enemy territory and allow the country to self-destruct from within. It should be noted that while China also developed these vaccines, they were never deployed and traditional vaccination platforms were used for its citizenry instead.
At this time, I feel each hypothesis is still quite likely to be true, and the purpose of this article series is to introduce the evidence for the Malthusian interpretation Dr. Yeadon hints at in his commentary. Lastly, while I believe it is likely the virus was deliberately engineered to create significant autoimmunity (a key characteristic of both COVID-19 infections and vaccine injuries), it is much harder to know if it was specifically engineered to reduce the fertility of those infected or was an early prototype for a virus that will be able to do this.
We will now review each of the vaccinations I have identified that appear to have contributed to reduced fertility. Each has most of the following characteristics:
- A tendency to produce autoimmunity to a protein necessary for pregnancy
- An unusual dosing schedule
- Distributed to all women of childbearing age
- Coercive and forceful measures are implemented that ensure a high rate of vaccination uptake.
Sound familiar?
This report will review the following vaccinations:
- Whole Cell Pertussis Vaccines
- hCG Vaccines
- The HPV Vaccine
- The Anthrax Vaccine
- The Porcine zona pellucida contraceptive vaccine
RFK Jr. always focuses on the 1988 law that led to the establishment of the National Vaccine Injury Program because it was the turning point in America’s vaccination program that began our current era of chronic illness. The three most dangerous vaccinations developed in this new era had two characteristics in common: a frequent association with the development of severe autoimmune conditions and negative effects on fertility.
The first one, anthrax, was covered in a previous article. Prior to COVID-19, the second vaccine, Gardasil, was the one I considered to be the most dangerous on the market and had injured or disabled multiple people I directly knew. The third is of course the COVID-19 vaccines. After discussing these vaccines, I will also briefly review the Porcine Zona Pellucida vaccine.